Date: 25.12.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 499
Lex.resourcesed.info #Web mining

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Web mining

Web mining

Nov/Tue/2017 | Uncategorized








What is Web mining? - Definition from WhatIs com - SearchCRM

Web mining

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Web Mining: анализ использования веб-ресурсов, обработка веб

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, order essay -
Web Mining: анализ использования веб-ресурсов, обработка веб

asp net 2 0 resume Location: New York City. Available for direct contacts from businesses for short-time web development projects. Web Mining. Not interested in permanent positions. Beggars Opera. Please no calls from web mining recruiters. To obtain a project manager / architect / senior developer position in a web development project (ASP.NET, C#, VB.NET, SQL Server). Interested only in consulting positions in Applicant’s Undergoing Interview Essay, New York City. More than 11 years of experience in full cycle of software development. Dozens of successfully designed solutions and web mining databases. Top Microsoft certifications in .NET software development (MCSD, MCAD, MCPD), SQL Server (MCDBA) and beggars opera engineering (MCSE); Master of Science.

Best expertise in ASP.NET/ASP.NET 2.0, C#/VB.NET, .NET Framework, SQL Server (T-SQL, Stored Proc, DTS), UML, usability . Web Mining. Skilled in XML/XSLT, XML Web Services, HTML/DHTML, CSS, JavaScript, OOP, SourceSafe, Java, MTS/COM+, C++, ADO.NET, OLTP, OLAP, data warehousing, MySQL, FoxPro (VFP), Crystal Reports, SQL Reporting Services and more. Pranas.NET is an IT consulting company. Developed an e-commerce web site condo-sales.com , where users can search and buy historical condominium sales information as ASP.NET ( C#, VB.NET ) web application with SQL Server 2000 back-end. Helped in formulating the business case for the site, individually designed the logical and Essay about Evolution Gangster and America physical structure of the web mining application Created sophisticated SQL Server database to responsively handle complex queries (T-SQL, DTS, triggers, stored procedures, functions, optimization) and .NET data access components Implemented business logic as .NET Framework assemblies (C#, VB.NET) Envisioned and built front-end for the site written in ASP.NET, MS Visual Studio .NET, C#, VB.NET, XML, VBScript, HTML, DHTML, JavaScript, Dreamweaver Performed Search Engine Optimization (SEO) of the web site to Applicant’s after Undergoing Employment Interview, increase traffic A number of private labels web sites (like Condos.WiredNewYork.com) were developed where a different branding allows the sites to sell the data under their name. All sites are single code-base with dynamically applied style.

Performed Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for web mining mrofficespace.com, yrpubs.com and disorder cooperator.com. Redesigned the home pages for mrofficespace.com and yrpubs.com. Yale Robbins, Inc publishes real estate magazines, designs and hosts real estate web sites and supplies the client web sites with data. Converted legacy Residential Buildings FoxPro application into web mining, intranet ASP.NET Web Application written in C# and VB.NET with SQL Server 2000 on the backend. Performed business and Self-Perception Essay system analysis, designed application and database structure, converted existing data into SQL Server using Data Transformation Services (DTS) and VBScript Created Web Forms using ASP.NET, MS Visual Studio .NET, C#, VB.NET, XML, VBScript, HTML, DHTML, CSS, JavaScript. Used Crystal Reports to create reports based on SQL Server database. Supervised the development of cooperator.com - a web site for Cooperator magazine. The website provides access to real estate articles and web mining directory of companies. Was individually responsible for creating the web sites back-end as MySQL database and data transformation services to load the articles and directory data from in-house databases Created data-driven pages in ASP, VBScript, ADO, InterDev 6.0, HTML/DHTML, JavaScript. Butler Intl Technology Solutions specializes in providing IT-based business solutions and technical services.

Butler Intl project for MCI-WorldCom International Network Operating Center. Built a data warehouse ( SQL Server 2000), and a single point of management (Web Portal on MS SharePoint Portal Server ) to a set of external systems to insure high network uptime. Performed business and system analysis, designed in beggars opera, UML the structure of three-tier solution, defined the hierarchy of classes to incorporate the business logic and implemented key components using COM+ architecture as ActiveX DLLs in MS Visual Basic 6.0 Designed and took a leading role in web mining, implementing the personality presentation layer in MS SharePoint Portal Server. Administered IIS 5 Server, performed coding of in ASP, ASP.NET, VBScript, VB.NET, C#, JavaScript, HTML, DHTML, XML documents transferred to HTML using XSL Designed the web mining database in MS SQL Server 2000, created specifications of Interview Essay SQL Server stored procedures and web mining implemented most of them. Performed database administration In collaboration with WorldCom developers created components to communicate with various WorldCom systems: Java adapter to of attachment, exchange data with Oracle database Java/VB adapter to exchange XML documents with another ticketing system Adapters to several SQL Server databases Was responsible for web mining writing a number of sophisticated Data Transformation Services (DTS) in capitalism, T-SQL and VBScript in SQL Server. Web Mining. Butler Intl project for CitiBank. Define Social. Designed OLAP solution to perform multidimensional analysis of web mining financial data using Cognos PowerPlay with existing Sybase database at the backend. Butler Intl project for MCI-WorldCom. Essay Gangster And America. Took the leading role converting legacy outage warnings and status report applications to ASP - SQL Server architecture. As a senior developer: Performed the web mining existing system analysis and new architecture design (UML).

Coordinated and supervised the efforts of several other programmers. Individually designed MS SQL Server 2000 database, coded stored procedures (T-SQL). Undergoing Employment Interview. Coded ASP in web mining, MS Visual InterDev 6.0 using VBScript, JavaScript, HTML/DHTML/CSS, XML and ADO. Created components in MS Visual Basic 6.0, used CDO and Outlook 2000 for cause messaging. Deployed the solution, participated in web mining, testing and documenting.

Programmed client-side (HTML, JavaScript) for mrofficespace.com . Designed and built a number of data-driven applications to support publishing business using ASP, HTML, MySQL, JavaScript, Visual Basic, Visual FoxPro, MySQL and Seagate Crystal Reports. The applications in particular: Allow large number of concurrent users to manipulate MySQL database that serves as a back-end for mrofficespace.com (OLTP MS Visual FoxPro application through ODBC drivers). Automatically create various HTML pages, cache them in a database for use on multiple disorder cause the web site, making it highly responsive. Contain OLAP applications with complete reporting tools (Seagate Crystal Reports) Send customized e-mails using Outlook CDO and web mining send faxes using Symantec WinFax Pro API. Beggars Opera. Individually created database application using Visual FoxPro and VBA to handle customer information, bookkeeping, generating reports and statistical information, Word and Excel data-driven (VBA) automatic document generation.

The software is used in web mining, 5 company offices in Russia and Great Britain. In December 1999 2000 individually performed analysis, architecture definition, database design, coding, testing and deploying of ASP, MS Visual Basic 6.0, MS SQL Server 7.0 2-tier windows application to manage customers, flights, resorts and reservations data. The Microsoft Certified Professional Developer: Web Developer (MCPD: Web Developer) certification demonstrates that you have the comprehensive skills that are required to build interactive, data-driven Web applications that use ASP.NET 2.0 for both intranet and beggars opera Internet uses. The MCSD for web mining Microsoft .NET credential is the top-level certification for beggars opera advanced developers who design and web mining develop leading-edge enterprise solutions, using Microsoft development tools and technologies as well as the Microsoft .NET Framework. Undergoing Essay. The MCAD for Microsoft .NET credential provides industry recognition for professional developers who build powerful applications using Microsoft Visual Studio® .NET and Web services.

Completed more than 3,000 hours of advanced mathematics and programming. Mastered OOP, C++, Basic, FoxPro, Pascal.

Order Essay Services & Assignment Papers Online -
What is Web mining? - Definition from WhatIs com - SearchCRM

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, order custom written essays online -
What is Web Mining? - Definition from Techopedia

How to Write a Bibliography – Examples in MLA Style. Please note, all entries should be typed double-spaced. In order to keep this Web page short,single rather than double space is used here. See Bibliography Sample Page for web mining, a properly double-spaced Bibliography or Works Cited sample page. Examples cited on this page are based on the authoritative publication from MLA. If the example you want is not included here, please consult the MLA Handbook, or ask the writer to define, look it up for you. Format for entries: A single space is used after any punctuation mark. When dividing a long word or URL onto two lines, put hyphen, slash, or period at the end of the line.

Do not add a hyphen to a URL that was not originally there. Never begin a new line with a punctuation mark. Double-space all lines in a bibliography entry. Do not indent the first line of a bibliography entry, indent second and subsequent lines 5 spaces, or 1/2? (1.25 cm) from the left margin. Please see Chapter 11.

Guidelines on How to Write a Bibliography for details. When writing a bibliography, remember that the purpose is to communicate to web mining, the reader, in summarise of attachment a standardized manner, the sources that you have used in sufficient detail to be identified. If you are unable to find all the web mining necessary information, just cite what you can find. Click here to see a selection of Common Abbreviations used in documentation. And America! For a complete list of Common Scholarly Abbreviations used in web mining parentheses, tables, and documentation, please go to importance intelligence, Section 7.4 of the 6th edition of the MLA Handbook. Bell, Stewart.

The Martyr’s Oath: The Apprenticeship of a Homegrown Terrorist . Mississauga, ON: Wiley, 2005. Biale, David, ed. Web Mining! Cultures of the summarise theories Jews: A New History . New York: Schocken, 2002. Bowker, Michael. Fatal Deception: The Untold Story of Asbestos: Why It Is Still Legal. and Still Killing Us . N.p.: Rodale, 2003. N.p. = No place of publication indicated. Capodiferro, Alessandra, ed.

Wonders of the World: Masterpieces of Architecture from. 4000 BC to the Present . Vercelli: White Star, 2004. Cross, Charles R. Room Full of Mirrors: A Biography of web mining Jimi Hendrix . New York: Maltin, Leonard, ed. Movie Video Guide 2002 Edition . New York: New American, 2001. Meidenbauer, Jorg, ed. Discoveries and Inventions: From Prehistoric to Modern Times . Lisse: Rebo, 2004.

Puzo, Mario. The Family: A Novel . Completed by Carol Gino. New York: Harper, 2001. Rowling, J.K. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets . New York: Scholastic, 1999.

—. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban . Beggars Opera! Thorndike, ME: Thorndike, 2000. Suskind, Ron. The Price of Loyalty: George W. Web Mining! Bush, the Applicant’s after Interview Essay White House, and the Education of. Paul O’Neill . Web Mining! New York: Simon, 2004. If your citation is from one volume of a multivolume work and each volume has its own title, you need cite only the actual volume you have used without reference to other volumes in the work. Example: The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud comes in 5 volumes, written by Peter Gay. (Title of Vol. Multiple Personality Disorder! 1: Education of the Senses ) Gay, Peter.

Education of the Senses . New York: Norton, 1999. (Title of Vol. 2: The Tender Passion) Gay, Peter. The Tender Passion . New York: Oxford UP, 1986. (Title of Vol. 3: The Cultivation of Hatred ) Gay, Peter. The Cultivation of web mining Hatred . London: Harper, 1994. (Title of Vol.

4: The Naked Heart ) Gay, Peter. The Naked Heart . New York: Norton, 1995. (Title of Vol. 5: Pleasure Wars ) Gay, Peter. Pleasure Wars . New York: Norton, 1998. 2. Multiple Disorder Cause! Book with two authors or editors: Bohlman, Herbert M., and Mary Jane Dundas. The Legal, Ethical and web mining International. Environment of Business . 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: West, 2002.

Bolman, Lee G., and Terrence E. Deal. Leading with Soul: An Uncommon Journey. of Spirit . Rev. ed. Multiple Disorder Cause! San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001. Calvesi, Maurizio, and Lorenzo Canova, eds. Rejoice! 700 Years of web mining Art for the Papal. Jubilee . New York: Rizzoli, 1999. Cohen, Andrew, and J.L. Importance! Granatstein, eds. Trudeau’s Shadow: The Life and Legacy.

of Pierre Elliott Trudeau . Toronto: Random, 1998. Heath, Joseph, and Andrew Potter. The Rebel Sell: Why the web mining Culture Can’t Be Jammed . 2nd ed. Toronto: Harper, 2005. Llewellyn, Marc, and Lee Mylne.

Frommer’s Australia 2005 . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2005. Summers, Anthony, and Robbyn Swan. Sinatra: The Life . New York: Knopf, 2005. Book prepared for publication by two editors: Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Essay about Gangster and America Hamlet, Prince of web mining Denmark . Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Washington.

3. Book with three authors or editors: Clancy, Tom, Carl Stiner, and Tony Koltz. Shadow Warriors: Inside the disorder cause Special. Forces . Web Mining! New York: Putnam, 2002. Hewitt, Les, Andrew Hewitt, and Luc d’Abadie. The Power of Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview Focus for College. Students . Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications, 2005. Larsson, Mans O., Alexander Z. Speier, and Jennifer R. Weiss, eds. Let’s Go:

Germany 1998 . Web Mining! New York: St. Martin’s, 1998. Palmer, R.R., Joel Colton, and Lloyd Kramer. A History of the Modern World: To 1815 . 9th ed. New York: Knopf, 2002. Suzuki, David, Amanda McConnell, and Maria DeCambra. The Sacred Balance: A Visual Celebration of Our Place in multiple personality disorder cause Nature . Vancouver: Greystone, 2002. 4. Book with more than three authors or editors: You have a choice of listing all of the authors or editors in the order as they appear on the title page of the web mining book, or use “et al.” from the Latin et alii, or et aliae , meaning “and others” after the first author or editor named.

Nelson, Miriam E., Kristin R. Baker, Ronenn Roubenoff, and summarise theories Lawrence Lindner. Strong Women and web mining Men Beat Arthritis . New York: Perigee, 2003. Nelson, Miriam E., et al. Strong Women and Men Beat Arthritis . New York: Hogan, David J., et al., eds. The Holocaust Chronicle: A History in Words and Pictures . Lincolnwood, IL: International, 2000. Pound, Richard W., Richard Dionne, Jay Myers, and James Musson, eds. Canadian. Facts and Dates . About! 3rd ed.

Markham, ON: Fitzhenry, 2005. Pound, Richard W., et al., eds. Canadian Facts and Dates . 3rd ed. Markham, ON: Rogerson, Holly Deemer, et al. Words for Students of English: A Vocabulary. Series for web mining, ESL . Vol. 6. Advanced Level ESL.

Pittsburgh, PA: U of Pittsburgh P, 1989. 5. Book with compilers, or compilers and editors: McClay, John B., and Wendy L. Matthews, comps. and eds. Corpus Juris Humorous: A Compilation of Outrageous, Unusual, Infamous and Witty Judicial Opinions.

from 1256 A.D. to the Present . New York: Barnes, 1994. O’Reilly, James, Larry Habegger, and beggars opera Sean O’Reilly, comps. and eds. Danger: True Stories of Trouble and Survival . San Francisco: Travellers’ Tales, 1999. Teresa, Mother. The Joy in Loving: A Guide to Daily Living with Mother Teresa . Comp.

Jaya Chaliha and web mining Edward Le Joly. New York: Viking, 1997. Note abbreviation: comp. Beggars Opera! = compiler or compiled by. 6. Book with no author or editor stated: Maclean’s Canada’s Century: An Illustrated History of the People and Events. That Shaped Our Identity . Toronto: Key, 1999. Microsoft PowerPoint Version 2002 Step by web mining, Step . Redmond, WA: Perspection, 2001. The Movie Book . London: Phaidon, 1999.

With Scott to the Pole: The Terra Nova Expedition 1910-1913 . Photographs of. Herbert Ponting. New York: BCL, 2004. 7. Book with one author, translated by another: Muller, Melissa. Essay About Of The Gangster And America! Anne Frank: The Biography . Trans.

Rita and Robert Kimber. New York: Metropolitan, 1998. 8. Work in an anthology, a collection by web mining, several authors, with one or more editors and/or compilers: Fox, Charles James. “Liberty Is Order, Liberty Is Strength.” What Is a Man? 3,000 Years of of attachment Wisdom on the Art of web mining Manly Virtue. Ed. Waller R. Newell.

New York: Harper, 2001. 306-7. Wilcox, Robert K. “Flying Blind.” Danger: True Stories of define social capitalism Trouble and Survival . Comp. and ed. James O’Reilly, Larry Habegger, and Sean O’Reilly. San Francisco: Travellers’ Tales, 1999. 211-22. 9. Article in an encyclopedia with no author stated: “Nazi Party.” New Encyclopaedia Britannica . 1997 ed. “Tajikistan.” World Book Encyclopedia of People and Places . 2000 ed. 10.

Article in an encyclopedia with an author: If the encyclopedia is web mining, well known and importance of emotional intelligence articles are arranged alphabetically, it is not necessary to indicate the volume and page numbers. If the encyclopedia is not well known, you must give full publication information including author, title of article, title of encyclopedia, name of web mining editor or edition, number of volumes in the set, place of multiple personality publication, publisher and year of publication. Kibby, Michael W. “Dyslexia.” World Book Encyclopedia . 2000 ed. Midge, T. “Powwows.” Encyclopedia of North American Indians . Ed. Web Mining! D.L. Birchfield.

11 vols. New York: Cavendish, 1997. 11. Article in a magazine, journal, periodical, newsletter, or newspaper with no author stated: “100 Years of Dust and Glory.” Popular Mechanics Sept. 2001: 70-75.

“Celestica to Repair Palm Handhelds.” Globe and personality disorder cause Mail [Toronto] 29 Oct. 2002: B6. “E-Money Slips Quietly into Oblivion.” Nikkei Weekly [Tokyo] 22 Jan. 2001: 4. “McDonald’s Declines to Fund Obesity Education on Danger of Eating Its Food.” National Post [Toronto] 18 Apr. 2006: FP18. “Pot Use Doubled in web mining Decade, Study Says: 14% Smoked Up in the Past Year.” Toronto Star. 25 Nov. 2004: A18. “Secondhand Smoke Reduces Kids’ IQs.” Buffalo News 23 Jan. 2005: I6.

12. Article in a magazine, journal, periodical, newsletter, or newspaper with one or more authors: Use “+” for pages that are not consecutive. Example: When numbering pages, use “38-45” if page numbers are consecutive. Use “A1+” if article begins on page A1, contains more than one page, but paging is not consecutive. For page numbers consisting of cause more than 3 digits, use short version if it is clear to the reader, e.g. 220-268 may be written as 220-68, but 349-560 must be written in full. Note also that there is no period after the month. Web Mining! The period in “Mar.” is for the abbreviation of March. If there are 4 or less letters in theories the month, e.g. May, June, and July, the months are not abbreviated.

If the publication date is July 18, 2005, citation will be 18 July 2005. Where a journal or magazine is a weekly publication, “date, month, year” are required. Where a journal or magazine is a monthly publication, only “month, year” are needed. Where a newspaper title does not indicate the location of publication, add the city of publication between square brackets, e.g. Daily Telegraph [London]. Square brackets are used to web mining, enclose a word (or words) not found in the original but has been added by you. An article in a scholarly journal is Essay, treated somewhat differently: Nielsen, Laura Beth. “Subtle, Pervasive, Harmful: Racist and Sexist Remarks in. Public as Hate Speech.” Journal of Social Issues 58.2 (2002): 265. The above citation shows: Author’s name, Article title, Name of web mining scholarly journal (underlined), Volume number, Issue number, Year of publication (in parentheses), and Page number.

If the article is accessed online, add Access date and URL at Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Essay, the end, see 23. Internet citations, or citing electronic sources (e). Bogomolny, Laura. “Boss Your Career.” Canadian Business 13-16 Mar. 2006: 47-49. Cave, Andrew. Web Mining! “Microsoft and Sun Settle Java Battle.” Daily Telegraph [London] Cohen, Stephen S., and J. Bradford DeLong. “Shaken and Stirred.” Atlantic Monthly. Jan.-Feb. 2005: 112+. Coleman, Isobel. “Women, Islam, and the New Iraq.” Foreign Affairs Jan.-Feb.

2006: 24+. Daly, Rita. “Bird Flu Targeting the Young.” Toronto Star 11 Mar. 2006: A1+. Dareini, Ali Akbar. “Iranian President Defends Country’s Nuclear Ambitions.” Buffalo News. Hewitt, Ben. “Quick Fixes for Everyday Disasters.” Popular Mechanics Nov. 2004: 83-88. Johnson, Linda A. “Fight Flu with Good, Old Advice from Mom.” Buffalo News.

10 Oct. 2004: A1-2. Mather, Victoria. Define Social! “In Tiger Country.” Photos by James Merrell. Town Country Travel. Fall 2004: 102-111. Mohanty, Subhanjoy, and Ray Jayawardhana. “The Mystery of Brown Dwarf Origins.” Scientific American Jan. 2006: 38-45. Petroski, Henry. “Framing Hypothesis: A Cautionary Tale.” American Scientist Jan.-Feb. Plungis, Jeff, Ed Garsten, and Mark Truby. “Caremakers’ Challenge: Green, Mean. Machines.” Detroit News and Free Press Metro ed.

12 Jan. 2003: 1A+. Sachs, Jeffrey D. “A Practical Plan to End Extreme Poverty.” Buffalo News 23 Jan. 2005: I2. Saletan, William. “Junk-Food Jihad.” National Post [Toronto] 18 Apr. 2006: A18. Thomas, Cathy Booth, and Tim Padgett. “Life Among the Ruins.” Time 19 Sept. 2005: 28+. Wolanski, Eric, Robert Richmond, Laurence McCook, and Hugh Sweatman. “Mud, Marine Snow and web mining Coral Reefs.” American Scientist Jan.-Feb.

2003: 44-51. Wolanski, Eric, et al. “Mud, Marine Snow and Coral Reefs.” American Scientist. Jan.-Feb. Multiple Cause! 2003: 44-51. 13. Article from SIRS (Social Issues Resources Series): Suggested citation example from web mining, SIRS:

Bluestone, Barry, and multiple personality disorder cause Irving Bluestone. “Workers (and Managers) of the World Unite.” Technology Review Nov.-Dec. 1992: 30-40. Web Mining! Reprinted in WORK . (Boca Raton, FL: Social Issues Resource Series, 1992), Article No. 20. Bluestone, Barry, and beggars opera Irving Bluestone. “Workers (and Managers) of the web mining World Unite.” Technology Review Nov.-Dec. 1992: 30-40. Work . Ed.

Eleanor Goldstein. Vol. 5. Boca Raton: SIRS, 1992. Art. 20. Put in summarise square brackets [ ] important information you have added that is not found in the source cited. Build-a-Bear. Advertisement.

7 Feb. 2005 http://www.buildabear.com/shop/default.aspx. GEICO. Advertisement. Newsweek 16 Jan. Web Mining! 2006: 92. IBM. Advertisement. Globe and Mail [Toronto] . 29 Oct. 2002: B7. Toyota. Advertisement.

Atlantic Monthly . Jan.-Feb. 2005: 27-30. 15. Booklet, pamphlet, or brochure with no author stated: Diabetes Care: Blood Glucose Monitoring . Burnaby, BC: LifeScan Canada, 1997. 16. Booklet, pamphlet, or brochure with an Applicant’s Self-Perception after Interview Essay, author: Zimmer, Henry B. Web Mining! Canplan: Your Canadian Financial Planning Software . Calgary, AB: May use short forms: Rev. (Review), Ed. (Edition, Editor, or Edited), Comp. (Compiled, Compiler). Creager, Angela N.H. “Crystallizing a Life in Science.” Rev. of Rosalind Franklin: The. Dark Lady of DNA , by Brenda Maddox.

American Scientist Jan.-Feb. Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Employment! 2003: 64-66. Dillon, Brenda. “Hana’s Suitcase.” Rev. of Hana’s Suitcase , by Karen Levine. Professionally Speaking June 2003: 36. Foley, Margaret. “Measured Deception.” Rev. of The Measure of All Things: The. Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World, by Ken Alder.

Discover Nov. 2002: 77. Groskop, Viv. “Chinese Torture – at Five.” Rev. of web mining The Binding Chair, by Kathryn. Harrison. International Express 6 June 2000, Canadian ed.: 37. Hoffman, Michael J. “Huck’s Ironic Circle.” Rev. of The Adventures of Huckleberry. Finn , by Mark Twain.

Modern Critical Interpretations of summarise theories of attachment Mark Twain’s. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, ed. Harold Bloom. Web Mining! New York: Chelsea, Iragui, Vicente.

Rev. of of emotional Injured Brains of Medical Minds: Views from Within , comp. and ed. Narinder Kapur. Web Mining! New England Journal of Medicine 26 Feb. 1998: Neier, Aryeh. “Hero.” Rev. of Defending Human Rights in Russia: Sergei Kovalyov,

Dissident and Human Rights Commissioner, 1969-2003 , by Emma Gilligan. New York Review of Books 13 Jan. 2005: 30-33. Onstad, Katrina. “A Life of Pain and Paint.” Rev. of beggars opera Frida , dir. Web Mining! Julie Taymor. National.

Post [Toronto] 1 Nov. 2002: PM1+. Redekop, Magdalene. “The Importance of Being Mennonite.” Rev. of A Complicated. Kindness, by Miriam Toews. Literary Review of beggars opera Canada Oct. 2004: 19-20. Simic, Charles. “The Image Hunter.” Rev. of Joseph Cornell: Master of Dreams , by.

Diane Waldman. New York Review 24 Oct. Web Mining! 2002: 14+. 18. CD-ROM, DVD: See also 35. Tape Recording: Cassette, Movie/Film on social capitalism VHS or DVD (Digital Videodisc), Videocassette, Filmstrip. A Place in the Sun . Dir. George Stevens. 1951. DVD. Paramount, 2001 . Encarta 2004 Reference Library . CD-ROM.

Microsoft, 2003 . Encarta 2004 Reference Library Win32 . Educ. ed. Web Mining! DVD. Microsoft, 2003. LeBlanc, Susan, and Cameron MacKeen. “Racism and the Landfill.” Chronicle-Herald. 7 Mar. 1992: B1.

CD-ROM. Importance Of Emotional! SIRS 1993 Ethnic Groups. Vol. 4. Art. 42. Links 2003: Championship Courses . CD-ROM. Microsoft Game Studios, 2002. YellowPages.city: Toronto-Central West Edition , 1998. CD-ROM. Montreal:

19. Computer service – e.g. BRS, DIALOG, MEAD, etc.: Landler, Mark. “Can U.S. Companies Even Get a Bonjour?” New York Times , Late Ed. – Final Ed., 1. 2 Oct. Web Mining! 1995. DIALOG File 472, item 03072065.

When citing a definition from a dictionary, add the abbreviation Def. after the word. If the word has several different definitions, state the of emotional intelligence number and/or letter as indicated in the dictionary. “Mug.” Def. 2. The New Lexicon Webster’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of the. English Language . Canadian ed. 1988. Short forms may be used, e.g. dir. (directed by), narr. (narrated by), perf. (performers), prod. (produced by), writ. (written by). A minimal entry should include title, director, distributor, and year of release. May add other information as deemed pertinent between the title and the distributor. If citing a particular person involved in the film or movie, begin with name of that person. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory . Dir.

Tim Burton. Based on book by Roald Dahl. Perf. Johnny Depp. Web Mining! Warner, 2005. Depp, Johnny, perf. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory . Dir. Multiple Personality Cause! Tim Burton. Based on book. by Roald Dahl. Warner, 2005.

Burton, Tim, dir. Web Mining! Charlie and of attachment the Chocolate Factory . Based on book by Roald Dahl. Perf. Johnny Depp. Warner, 2005. Monster-in-Law . Dir. Robert Luketic. Writ. Anya Kochoff. Prod. Web Mining! Paula Weinstein,

Chris Bender, and J.C. Spink. Perf. Jennifer Lopez and Jane Fonda. New Line, 2005. Nanny McPhee . Dir. Kirk Jones. Based on Nurse Matilda Books Writ. Christianna. Brand. Prod.

Lindsay Doran, Tim Bevan, and Eric Fellner. Perf. Emma Thompson, Colin Firth, and Angela Lansbury. Define Social! Universal, 2005. One Hour Photo . Writ. and dir. Mark Romanek. Prod. Christine Vachon, Pam Koffler, and Stan Wlodkowski.

Perf. Robin Williams. Fox Searchlight, 2002. Titanic . Dir., writ., prod., ed. James Cameron. Prod. Jon Landau. Twentieth. Century Fox and Paramount, 1997. The Tuxedo . Dir. Web Mining! Kevin Donovan. Prod.

John H. Williams, and Adam Schroeder. Perf. Jackie Chan and personality disorder Jennifer Love Hewitt. DreamWorks, 2002. Cite government document in the following order if no author is stated: 1) Government, 2) Agency, 3) Title of publication , underlined, 4) Place of web mining publication, 5) Publisher, 6) Date. Canada. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Gathering Strength:

Canada’s Aboriginal Action Plan . Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and. Government Services Canada, 2000. United States. Importance Of Emotional! National Council on Disability. Carrying on the Good Fight – Summary Paper from Think Tank 2000 – Advancing the Civil and web mining Human. Rights of People with Disabilities from Diverse Cultures . Washington: Note: GPO = Government Printing Office in Washington, DC which publishes most of the U.S. Define Capitalism! federal government documents. In citing a Congressional Record, abbreviate and underline the term, skip all the details and web mining indicate only the date and page numbers. Example – for the following record: United States.

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 . PL 104-193. Congressional Record. Washington: GPO, July 31, 1996. Cong. Capitalism! Rec . 31 July 1996: 104-193. For examples on how to cite more complicated government documents, please see Section 5.6.21 in MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed. 23. Internet citations, or citing electronic sources:

Basic components of an Internet citation: 2) “Title of Article, Web page or site” in quotation marks. 3) Title of Magazine, Journal, Newspaper, Newsletter, Book, Encyclopedia, or Project , underlined. 5) Indicate type of material, e.g. Web Mining! advertisement, cartoon, clipart, electronic card, interview, map, online posting, photograph, working paper, etc. if not obvious. 6) Date of article, of Web page or site creation, revision, posting, last update, or date last modified. 7) Group, association, name of forum, sponsor responsible for Web page or Web site. 8) Access date (the date you accessed the Web page or site). 9) Complete Uniform Resource Locator (URL) or network address in angle brackets. Note: An exception is made in referencing a personal e-mail message where an individual’s e-mail address is omitted for privacy reasons. Skip any information that you cannot find anywhere on the Web page or in the Web site, and carry on, e.g. if your Internet reference has no author stated, leave out the author and begin your citation with the title. Always put your access date just before the URL which is placed between angle brackets or “less than” and summarise theories “greater than” signs at web mining, the end of the citation.

Generally, a minimum of three items are required for an Internet citation: Title, Access Date, and after Undergoing Employment URL. If the web mining URL is too long for a line, divide the address where it creates the least ambiguity and confusion, e.g. Beggars Opera! do not divide a domain name and end with a period such as geocities . Web Mining! Do not divide a term in the URL that is made up of combined words e.g. SchoolHouseRock . Never add a hyphen at the end of the line to multiple, indicate syllabical word division unless the hyphen is actually found in the original URL. Copy capital letters exactly as they appear, do not change them to web mining, lower case letters as they may be case sensitive and be treated differently by some browsers. Remember that the purpose of indicating the URL is for readers to be able to access the Web page. Accuracy and clarity are essential. a. Internet citation for an advertisement: IBM. Advertisement. 23 Mar. 2003 http://www.bharatiyahockey.org/2000Olympics/

TheraTears. Advertisement. Multiple! 2003. 8 May 2004 http://www.theratears.com/dryeye.htm. b. Internet citation for an article from an online database (e.g. SIRS, eLibrary), study guide, magazine, journal, periodical, newsletter, newspaper, online library subscription database service, or an article in PDF with one or more authors stated: Bezlova, Antoaneta. “China to Formalize One-Child Policy.” Asia Times Online . 24 May 2001. 10 Oct.

2005 http://www.atimes.com/china/CE24Ad02.html. Clifford, Erin. “Review of Neuropsychology.” SparkNotes . 10 Oct. 2005. Machado, Victoria, and George Kourakos. IT Offshore Outsourcing Practices in Canada . Web Mining! Ottawa: Public Policy Forum, 2004. 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.ppforum.com/ow/it_outsourcing.pdf. Marshall, Leon. “Mandela in Retirement: Peacemaker without Rest.” 9 Feb.

2001. National Geographic 10 Oct. 2005 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/ Thomason, Larisa. “HTML Tip: Why Valid Code Matters.” Webmaster Tips. Newsletter . Dec. 2003. NetMechanic. 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.netmechanic.com/ If using an multiple disorder cause, online library subscription database service, add the name of the service, the name of the library or library system, plus the location of the library where the database is accessed, e.g.: Gearan, Anne. “Justice Dept: Gun Rights Protected.” Washington Post . Web Mining! 8 May 2002.

SIRS. Importance Of Emotional Intelligence! Iona Catholic Secondary School, Mississauga, ON. Web Mining! 23 Apr. 2004. Note: 8 May 2002 = date of publication, 23 Apr. 2004 = date of access. Capitalism! Indicate page numbers after publication date if available, e.g.

8 May 2002: 12-14. Leave out page numbers if not indicated in source. Pahl, Greg. “Heat Your Home with Biodiesel”. Mother Earth News . Web Mining! 12 Jan. 2003. eLibrary Canada. Twin Lakes Secondary School, Orillia, ON.

10 Apr. 2006. Note: If citing the above source but information is define, obtained from accessing eLibrary at home, leave out the location of the school. Pahl, Greg. “Heat Your Home with Biodiesel”. Mother Earth News . 12 Jan. 2003. eLibrary Canada. 10 Apr.

2006. http://www.proquestk12.com. c. Internet citation for an article from an online encyclopedia: Duiker, William J. “Ho Chi Minh.” Encarta Online Encyclopedia . Web Mining! 2005. Microsoft. 10 Oct. 2005.

“Ho Chi Minh.” Encyclop?dia Britannica . 2005. Encyclop?dia Britannica Premium Service. 9 Oct. 2005 http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9040629. “Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC).” Britannica Concise Encyclopedia . 2005. Encyclop?dia Britannica. 8 Oct. 2005 http://concise.britannica.com/ebc/article?eu=402567.

d. Internet citation for an article from an online magazine, journal, periodical, newsletter, or newspaper with no author stated: “Childcare Industry ‘Should Welcome Men’.” BBC News Online: Education .7 June 2003. 10 Oct. Theories Of Attachment! 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/education/2971310.stm. “Taiwan: A Dragon Economy and web mining the Abacus.” BrookesNews.Com . Beggars Opera! 8 Dec. Web Mining! 2003. 10 Oct. Self-Perception After Employment! 2005 http://www.brookesnews.com/030812taiwan.html.

e. Internet citation for an article in a scholarly journal: Nielsen, Laura Beth. “Subtle, Pervasive, Harmful: Racist and Sexist Remarks in. Public as Hate Speech.” Journal of Social Issues 58.2 (2002), 265-280. 7 June 2003. f. Internet citation for a cartoon, chart, clipart, comics, interview, map, painting, photo, sculpture, sound clip, etc.: “Islamic State of web mining Afghanistan: Political Map.” Map. Atlapedia Online . 1993-2003. Latimer Clarke. 7 June 2003 http://www.atlapedia.com/online/maps/ Kersten, Rick, and Pete Kersten. “Congratulations!” Electronic card.

Blue Mountain Arts . 2000. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing! 7 June 2003 http://www.bluemountain.com/ Lee , Lawrence. Interview. JournalismJobs.com . Web Mining! Feb. 2003. 10 Oct. Multiple Cause! 2005.

Schulz, Charles. “Peanuts Collection – Snoopy Cuddling Woodstock.” Cartoon. Art.com . 25 Apr. 2004 http://www.art.com/asp/sp.asp?PD=10037710RFID=814547. “Woodhull, Victoria C.” American History 102 Photo Gallery. 1997.

State. Historical Society of Wisconsin. 10 Oct. 2005 http://us.history.wisc.edu/ g. Internet citation for an e-mail (email) from an individual, a listserve, an organization, or citation for web mining, an article forwarded from an online database by e-mail: Barr, Susan I. “The Creatine Quandry.” Bicycling Nov. 1998.

EBSCOhost Mailer. E-mail to E. Interior. 11 May 2003. Kenrick, John. “Re: Link to Musicals101.com.” E-mail to I. Lee. Intelligence! 10 May 2003. “NEW THIS WEEK for September 8, 2005.” E-mail to author. Web Mining! 8 Sept. 2005. PicoSearch. “Your PicoSearch Account is Reindexed.” E-mail to John Smith. h. Self-Perception Undergoing! Internet citation for an online government publication:

Canada. Office of the web mining Auditor General of about of the and America Canada and the Treasury Board. Secretariat. Web Mining! Modernizing Accountability Practices in the Public Sector . 6 Jan. 1998. 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/account/ United States. National Archives and define social Records Administration. The Bill of Rights . 29 Jan.

1998. 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall/ i. Internet citation for an online posting, forum, letter to the editor: Kao, Ivy. “Keep Spreading the Word.” Online posting. 4 June 2003. Reader Responses, Opinion Journal, Wall Street Journal Editorial Page . 10 Oct. 2005. Seaside Harry . “My Friend Drove My Car with the Parking Brake On!” Online. posting.

10 Oct. 2005. PriusOnline.com Forum Index – Prius – Technical . 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.priusonline.com/viewtopic.php?t=6298highlight=. j. Internet citation for an online project, an information database, a personal or professional Web site: The MAD Scientist Network . 1995-2001 or 30 Feb. 1906.

Washington U. School of Medicine. 10 Oct. 2005. Web Mining! http://www.madsci.org. O’Connor, J.J., and beggars opera E.F. Robertson. “John Wilkins.” Feb. 2002. U of St. Andrews, Scotland. 10 Oct.

2005 http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/ Officer, Lawrence H. Web Mining! “Exchange Rate between the personality United States Dollar and Forty. Other Countries, 1913 -1999.” Economic History Services, EH.Net, 2002. 13 Apr. 2006 http://www.eh.net/hmit/exchangerates/. Savill, R. Richard. “Jazz Age Biographies.” The Jazz Age Page . 23 Oct. 2000. 12 Apr. 2006 http://www.btinternet.com/ Sullivan, Danny. “Search Engine Math.” 26 Oct.

2001. Search Engine Watch . 10 Apr. 2006 http://www.searchenginewatch.com/facts/math.html. Wurmser, Meyrav, and Yotam Feldner. “Is Israel Negotiating with the Hamas?” Inquiry and Analysis No. 16.

23 Mar. 1999. Web Mining! The Middle East Media and. Research Institute. Importance Of Emotional! 10 Oct. 2005 http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi? k. Internet citation for a software download: It is web mining, not essential to include the file size. Do so if preferred by your instructor.

RAMeSize . Vers. 1.04. 15K. 24 Sept. 2000. Blue Dice Software. 12 Oct. 2004. l. Internet citation for Essay about Evolution of the Gangster, a speech taken from a published work with an editor:

Lincoln, Abraham. “The Gettysburg Address.” 19 Nov. 1863. The Collected Works of. Abraham Lincoln . Web Mining! Ed. Roy P. Basler. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 1955. Abraham Lincoln Online. About Evolution! 10 Oct.

2005 http://showcase.netins.net/ m. Internet citation for a work translated and edited by another: Augustine, Saint, Bishop of Hippo. Confessions Enchiridion . Web Mining! Trans. and summarise ed. Albert C. Outler. Web Mining! 1955. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist U. Digitized 1993. 10 Oct. 2005 http://www.ccel.org/a/augustine/confessions/ Blair, Tony.

Interview. Prime Minister’s Office. 31 May 2003. 13 Apr. 2006. Chirac, Jacques. Interview. Time 16 Feb. 2003. Personality Disorder! 10 Oct. 2005. Longin, Hellmut. Telephone interview. 3 May 2006. Neilsen, Jerry. E-mail interview. 28 Apr. 2006. Wyse, Randall. Personal interview. Web Mining! 24 July 2005.

State name of speaker, title of lecture in quotes, conference, convention or sponsoring organization if known, location, date. Bradley, Vicki. “Marriage.” Agnes Arnold Hall, U of social capitalism Houston. 15 Mar. 2003. Wilson-Smith, Anthony. “Hello, He Must Be Going.” Editorial. Maclean’s 26 Aug. 2002: 4. Lange, Rick. “U.N.

Has Become Ineffective and web mining Ought to Be Disbanded.” Letter. Beggars Opera! Buffalo. News 23 Jan. 2005: I5. Woods, Brede M. Letter. Newsweek 23 Sept. Web Mining! 2002: 16.

Kolbert, Elizabeth. Of Attachment! “Six Billion Short: How Will the Mayor Make Ends Meet?” Letter. New Yorker 13 Jan. 2003: 33-37. Geens, Jennifer. Reply to letter of web mining Bill Clark. Beggars Opera! Toronto Star 29 Sept. 2002: A1. A letter you received from John Smith:

Smith, John. Letter to the author. 15 June 2005. Twain, Mark. “Banned in Concord.” Letter to web mining, Charles L. Beggars Opera! Webster. 18 Mar. 1885. Letter 850318 of Mark Twain . Ed. Jim Zwick. 2005. 10 Oct. 2005.

Treat citation as if it is a book with no author stated. Indicate if the citation is for a chart or a map. 2004 Andex Chart . Chart. Windsor, ON: Andex, 2004. Canada . Map.

Ottawa: Canadian Geographic, 2003. “Dallas TX.” Map. 2005 Road Atlas: USA, Canada, Mexico . Greenville, SC: Michelin, 2005. Components: 1) Name of composer. 2) Title of ballet, music or opera, underlined, 3) Form, number and key not underlined. Beethoven, Ludwig van. Fur Elise. Strauss, Richard. Traumerei , op. 9, no. Web Mining! 4.

Components for a published score, similar to a book citation: 1) Name of composer. Essay About Evolution And America! 2) Underline title of ballet, music, opera, as well as no. and op., important words capitalized, prepositions and conjunctions in lower case. 3) Date composition written. 4) Place of publication: 5) Publisher, 6) Date of web mining publication. Chopin, Frederic. Mazurka Op. 7, No. 1 . New York: Fischer, 1918.

Ledbetter, Huddie, and beggars opera John Lomax. Web Mining! Goodnight, Irene . Evolution Gangster! 1936. New York: Spencer, 1950. Stier, Walter C. Sweet Bye and Bye . Web Mining! London: Paxton, 1953. Weber, Carl Maria von. Beggars Opera! Invitation to the Dance Op. 65 . 1819. Web Mining! London: Harris, 1933. 29. Painting, photograph, sculpture, architecture, or other art form.

Components for citing original artwork: 1) Name of artist. 2) Title of artwork, underlined. 3) Date artwork created. Beggars Opera! 4) Museum, gallery, or collection where artwork is housed; indicate name of owner if private collection, 5) City where museum, gallery, or collection is located. Ashoona, Kiawak. Web Mining! Smiling Family . Multiple Cause! 1966. Web Mining! McMichael Canadian Art Collection, Brancusi, Constantin. The Kiss . 1909.

Tomb of T. Rachevskaia, Montparnasse. The Great Sphinx . [c. 2500 BC]. Giza. Ingres, Jean-Auguste-Dominique. Odalisque . 1814. Louvre Museum, Paris. Raphael. The School of Athens . 1510-11. Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican Palace, Rude, Francois.

La Marseillaise . 1833-36. Define Capitalism! Arc de Triomphe, Paris. Components for web mining, artwork cited from a book: 1) Name of artist. 2) Underline title of artwork. 3) Date artwork created (if date is uncertain use [c. 1503] meaning [circa 1503] or around the define capitalism year 1503). 4) Museum, art gallery, or collection where artwork is house, 5) City where museum, gallery, or collection is located. 6) Title of book used. 7) Author or editor of book.

8) Place of publication: 9) Publisher, 10) Date of web mining publication. 11) Other relevant information, e.g. figure, page, plate, or slide number. Abell, Sam. Japan . 1984. National Geographic Photographs: The Milestones . By Leah Bendavid-Val, et al.

Washington, DC: National Geographic, 1999. Carr, Emily. A Haida Village . [c. 1929]. McMichael Canadian Art Collection, Kleinburg, ON. The McMichael Canadian Art Collection . By Jean Blodgett, et al. Toronto: McGraw, 1989. 134. Kasebier, Gertrude.

The Magic Crystal . [c. 1904]. Royal Photographic Society, Bath. A Basic History of Art . By H.W. Essay Evolution! Janson and Anthony F. Janson. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice, 1991. 412. Leonardo, da Vinci. Mona Lisa (La Gioconda) . [c.

1503-5]. Louvre Museum, Paris. Favorite Old Master Paintings from the Louvre Museum . New York: Abbeville, 1979. 31. Michelangelo. David . 1501-04. Accademia di Belle Arti, Florence. The Great.

Masters . By Giorgio Vasari. Trans. Gaston Du C. de Vere. New York: Park Lane, 1986. 226. Sullivan, Louis. Wainright Building . 1890-91. St. Louis, MO. A Basic History of Art . By H.W.

Janson and web mining Anthony F. Janson. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice, Tohaku, Deme. Ko-omote Female Mask . Edo period [1603-1867], Japan. Naprstek. Museum, Prague. The World of Masks . By Erich Herold, et al. Trans. Dusan. Zbavitel. London: Hamlyn, 1992.

207. Vanvitelli, Luigi, and Nicola Salvi. Chapel of St. John the Baptist . Of Emotional! 1742-51. Sao Roque, Lisbon. Web Mining! By Rolf Toman, ed. Baroque: Architecture, Sculpture, Painting . Cologne: Konemann, 1998. 118. Components for a personal photograph: 1) Subject (not underlined or put in quotes).

2) Name of person who took the of emotional photograph. 3) Date photograph taken. War in Iraq: Operation Iraq Freedom on CNN. Personal photograph by author. Great Wall of China, Beijing, China. Personal photograph by Cassy Wyse. 28 July 2005. Components: 1) Patent inventor(s) or owner(s). 2) Title of patent.

3) Issuing country and patent number. 4) Date patent was issued. Arbter, Klaus, and Guo-Qing Wei. “Verfahren zur Nachfuhrung eines Stereo-Laparoskope. in der minimal invasiven Chirurgie.” German Patent 3943917. July 1996. “Conversion of Calcium Compounds into Solid and Gaseous Compounds.” US Patent 5078813. Kamen, Dean L., et al. “Transportation Vehicles and web mining Methods.” US Patent 5971091. 31. Performance: (ballet, concert, musical, opera, play, theatrical performance)

Disney’s The Lion King . By Roger Allers and Irene Mecchi. Dir. Evolution Of The Gangster And America! Julie Taymor. Music and lyrics by Elton John and Tim Rice. Princess of Wales Theatre, Toronto. 9 June 2002. The Hobbit . By J.R.R.

Tolkien. Dir. Kim Selody. Perf. Herbie Barnes, Michael. Simpson, and Chris Heyerdahl. Living Arts Centre, Mississauga, ON. The Nutcracker . By Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky.

Chor. and Libretto by James. Kudelka. Cond. Ormsby Wilkins and Uri Mayer. National Ballet of. Canada. Hummingbird Centre, Toronto. 30 Dec. 1999. Phantom of the Opera . By Andrew Lloyd Webber.

Lyrics by Charles Hart. Dir. Harold Prince. Based on novel by Gaston Leroux. Web Mining! Pantages Theatre, Toronto. 20 Sept. 1998. The Shanghai Acrobats . By Incredible! Acrobats of China. Define Social! Living Arts Centre,

Mississauga, ON. 4 Mar. 2005. Components: 1) Title of episode, underlined; or in quotes if appropriate. 2) Title of program, underlined. 3) Title of series. Web Mining! 4) Name of network. 5) Radio station or TV channel call letters, 6) City of summarise local station or channel.

6) Broadcast date. The CFRB Morning Show . By Ted Woloshyn. CFRB Radio, Toronto. Web Mining! 12 Sept. 2003. Law and Order . Prod. Personality Cause! Wolf Film, Universal Television. NBC Television Network. WHEC, Rochester, NY. 16 Oct. 2002.

“New Threat from Osama?” By Jim Stewart. CBS News . WBEN, Buffalo. “New York Museum Celebrates Life of Einstein.” By Martha Graybow. Reuters, New York. WBFO, Buffalo. 13 Nov. 2002.

“The Nightmare Drug.” By Bob McKeown, Linden MacIntyre, and Hana Gartner. The Fifth Estate . CBC, Toronto. 16 Oct. Web Mining! 2002. “U.S.: Tape Sounds Like Bin Laden.” AP, Washington, DC.

On Your Side . WGRZ-TV, Buffalo. 13 Nov. Of Emotional! 2002. 33. Recording – Music CD, LP, magnetic tape: 1) Name of author, composer, singer, or editor. 2) Title of song (in quotation marks). 3) Title of recording (underlined). 4) Publication medium (LP, CD, magnetic tape, etc.). 5) Edition, release, or version.

6) Place of publication: Publisher, Date of publication. Web Mining! If citing from Internet, see Item 23. Backstreet Boys. Multiple Personality Disorder Cause! Larger than Life . Millennium. CD. Exclusive Management by. The Firm, Los Angeles, CA. Mastered by Tom Coyne, Sterling Sound, NYC. Burch, Marilyn Reesor.

Mosaic . CD. Writ., dir. and prod. Marilyn Reesor. Burch. Choirs dir. Don and Catherine Robertson. Barrie, ON: Power. Plant Recording Studio, n.d. Burch, Marilyn Reesor. Mosaic . CD.

Writ., dir. and prod. Marilyn Reesor. Burch. Choirs dir. Web Mining! Don and Catherine Robertson. Barrie, ON: Power. Plant Recording Studio, [c. 1997]. Note: “n.d.” means “no date” available. Beggars Opera! [c. 1997] means “circa 1997.”

McDonald, Michael. Web Mining! No Lookin’ Back . Define Social Capitalism! LP. Prod. Michael McDonald and. Ted Templeman. Engineered and mixed by R. ThinkPad ACP Patch for ThinkPad 600, 770, and 770E . Diskette. Vers. 1.0. Tape Recording: Cassette, DVD (Digital Videodisc), Filmstrip, Videocassette. Covey, Stephen R. Living the 7 Habits: Applications and web mining Insights . Cassette.

tape recording read by author. New York: Simon, Audio Div., 1995. Ginger . Solid Ground. Cassette tape recording from album Far Out . Vancouver: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban . Dir. Alfonso Cuar o n. Based on beggars opera novel.

by J.K. Web Mining! Rowling. Perf. Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson. DVD. Warner, 2004. Jane Austen’s Emma . Videocassette. Meridian Broadcasting. Beggars Opera! New York: New Video Group, 1996. Kicking Screaming . Dir.

Jesse Dylan. Writ. Leo Benvenuti and Steve Rudnick. Perf. Will Ferrell and Robert Duvall. DVD. Universal, 2005. The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants . Dir. Ken Kwapis. Based on web mining novel by. Ann Brashares.Perf.

Amber Tamblyn, America Ferrera, Blake Lively, and Alexis Bledel. DVD. Warner, Dungaree, 2005. Super Searching the Web . Videocassette. Lancaster, PA: Classroom Connect, The Wizard of Oz . Dir. Victor Fleming. Based on theories of attachment book by Lyman Frank Baum. Perf.

Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, Jack Haley, Billie Burke, Margaret Hamilton, Charley Grapewin, and web mining the Munchkins. MGM, 1939. VHS. Warner, 1999.

State author, title of unpublished dissertation or thesis in after Essay quotes, label Diss. or MA thesis, name of web mining university, and year. Elmendorf, James. “The Military and the Mall: Society and Culture in Long Beach, California.” BA. thesis. Hampshire College, 1995. Jackson, Marjorie. “The Oboe: A Study of Essay about Evolution Gangster Its Development and Use.” Diss.

Columbia U, 1962.

Buy an Essay Online for Cheap 24/7 -
Web mining — Википедия

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, order custom essay online -
What is Web mining? - Definition from WhatIs com - SearchCRM

Writing A Good Essay Online Tutor. Writing A Good Essay Online Tutor. Writing A Good Essay Online Tutor. Essay for web mining money first-stage service examination. First and foremost, it’s always better to opt for summarise of attachment services recommended by friends. If no such advice as to web mining where your peers buy essay isn’t given, look for feedbacks and reviews regarding writing websites available. Should you stumble on a random service, don’t rush placing an order right ahead. Before everything else, look for a Support hotline’s contacts and give us a call. At a proper website to pay for academic paper online attending managers answer pretty quickly and provide exhaustive information regarding how we works. Given you’re looking to buy an essay and these are your funds to capitalism be spent, you surely want to have some guarantees. That’s why the next thing to do is check out web mining, a page with guarantees and see whether they live up to your expectations in terms of billing security and content quality.

Second-stage examination to buy an Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Employment, essay online. To buy essays at any chosen service, you have to be sure the paper will be plagiarism-free and web mining, live up to your task instructions. After Essay. Therefore, take a look at the order page. Are the customization options meet your demands? Great, but don’t forget to web mining consult Support hotline with a view to: Who my writer will be? Will he or she be a degreed English expert in summarise theories of attachment, my field? What if a paper be coming late? How can I contact my writer?

Can you revise my paper and amend some parts? As a rule, if answers to these five questions are alright, buy an academic paper at craftanessay.com will deserve paying for. Just make sure that your academic paper will be authentic and delivered on web mining, time. Summarise Of Attachment. Always lay emphasis on the fact a paper has to be done from scratch without any re-writing or copy-pasting from web mining other orders. Genuine writing is key, and if a website can provide it, it’s one hundred percent worth using. Self-Perception After. Make the right choice! All rights reserved.

should be there! Terms conditions Privacy policy Referral program. Please read these Terms and Conditions (“Terms” and/or “Terms and Conditions”) carefully before using the craftanessay.com website (“Website”). Your access to web mining and use of of emotional intelligence, Website are conditioned on your full acceptance and compliance with these Terms and Conditions and this Website Privacy Policy, which are published at web mining, craftanessay.com and which are incorporated herein by reference (“Privacy Policy”). These Terms and Conditions and Employment, Privacy Policy are applied to all visitors, users and others who access or use this Website. By accessing or using this Website, you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

If you disagree with these Terms and Conditions and/or Privacy Policy or any part of them, you must not use this Website. Capitalized terms defined in these Terms and Conditions shall have no other meaning but set forward in this section. The following terminology is web mining, applied to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy and Refund and Revision Policy: “Client”, “You” and “Your” refers to you, the person accessing this Website and accepting these Terms and Conditions. “We”, “Us” and “Ourselves” refers to craftanessay.com website. Importance Of Emotional. Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same. By using our Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit to craftanessay.com is truthful and accurate; (b) you will maintain the web mining accuracy of such information; (c) you are 18 years of age or older and/or have full legal capacity to enter into legally binding relations; and Self-Perception Employment Interview, (d) your use of the Services does not violate any applicable law, regulation, and/or your college/university/school rules. Your profile may be deleted and Services provided to you may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are less than 18 years of age and/or do not have full legal capacity to web mining enter into legally binding relations. Subjected to full compliance with these Terms and Conditions, craftanessay.com shall provide academic writing services as described more fully on the Website (“Services”). Services may include, but not be limited to, providing our Clients with dissertations, research papers, book reports, term papers, and other types of assignments written by craftanessay.com team (“Paper”) which are intended for research/reference purposes and for your personal use only. Services may include editing, proofreading, paraphrasing, or formatting existing papers of importance of emotional intelligence, our Clients. Web Mining. Please note that rewriting an define social capitalism, existing paper that contains 40% or more plagiarized content may qualify as providing you with a custom Paper and shall be charged for accordingly.

Please note that Services may be provided only to the users who submit an web mining, appropriate order form at of emotional, the Website and web mining, craftanessay.com may charge fees for such Services. The Services are provided according to the provisions of these Terms and Conditions and theories, the specific commercial provisions and policies (including Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, etc.) as detailed on web mining, the Website, and these provisions and beggars opera, policies may be amended or changed from time to time. The format of the Papers we provide: 12 point Times New Roman; Bibliography on web mining, a separate page; Approximately 250 words per multiple page;

One inch margin top, bottom, left, right; Title and Reference pages are free of charge. In case Client needs a single-spaced Paper they are to web mining pay a double fee. The standard Paper formatting includes a Title page , main content of the Paper, and a Reference page. Note that you pay only for disorder cause the main content of the Paper, while a Title page and a Reference page are provided free of charge. craftanessay.com reserves the web mining right to use any relevant materials available, such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, online publications, etc., unless the summarise Client indicates some specific sources to be used. PLACING AN ORDER. When placing your order, you must provide accurate and web mining, complete information.

You are solely responsible for any possible consequences and misunderstandings, in case you provide us with inaccurate and/or incorrect and/or unfaithful information. Please be advised that you will be asked to beggars opera give final confirmation to the instructions you provide in order details. Your Paper instructions should be confirmed in your Order Tracking Area within 3 hours after placing your order (and within 1 hour for orders with urgency less than 24 hours). Orders without instructions will not be worked on and may be delayed and you accept sole responsibility for such delay. craftanessay.com guarantees that the web mining delivered Paper will meet only confirmed requirements. Multiple Cause. You must not change the web mining instructions once you have confirmed them.

Any alterations to confirmed instructions are considered as additional order, thereby requiring additional payment. All payments are due upon Essay and America receipt. Web Mining. If the payment is not received or payment method is declined, the summarise theories Client forfeits of web mining, Services. All fees are exclusive of all taxes and/or levies, and/or duties imposed by taxing authorities, and beggars opera, you shall be responsible for payment of web mining, all such taxes and/or levies, and/or duties. You agree to pay any such taxes that might be applicable to your use of the Services and payments made by you under these Terms.

If at any time you contact your bank or credit card company and decline or otherwise reject the charge of any payment, this act will be considered as a breach of your obligation hereunder and your use of the Services will be automatically terminated. Use of stolen credit card and/or any credit card fraud is considered to Applicant’s after Undergoing Interview Essay be a serious crime. craftanessay.com closely cooperates with our payment provider to prevent and fight online fraud. In case of any online fraud, appropriate state authorities will be contacted immediately. By doing a chargeback, you agree to give up all your rights to web mining the Paper automatically. About Gangster And America. At the web mining same time, you authorize craftanessay.com to publish the completed Paper and start the authorship procedure that will allow us to Applicant’s after Undergoing Essay determine if you have used any parts of the Paper. Web Mining. The procedure may include contacting your school officials and/or posting your full details along with the completed Paper online.

craftanessay.com reserves the right to change its prices at any time in its sole discretion and Essay about Evolution of the Gangster, such changes or modifications shall be posted online at the Website and become effective immediately without need for further notice to any Client and/or user. We care about our Clients and are always looking for ways to offer them the best value for money. One method we use is a discount system. craftanessay.com, at its sole discretion, shall have the right to provide our Clients with discount programs as described more fully and web mining, published on the Website. According to our loyalty program, you earn back 10% of your total bill in Points (1 currency unit (inter alia USD/ EUR/ GBP etc.) = 1 Point) after you make your first order. Your Points are accumulated on your Credit Balance. “Credit Balance” is an account for beggars opera Points of web mining, a Client which can be used for future purchases on the Website exclusively.

You can use your Points for your next purchases on Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview Essay, the Website exclusively. Your Points cannot be refunded. The discount may be obtained by the use of the promo code. Web Mining. The amount of theories, Points added to the Credit Balance is calculated on the basis of the order price excluding the web mining applied discount (if any). Later, 5% of summarise theories of attachment, every next order (not including credits) is web mining, added to your Credit Balance. craftanessay.com will issue a refund to you only according to these Terms. craftanessay.com offers a 14-day money back period for Papers less than 20 pages and beggars opera, a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages (”Refund Period”).

Refund Period begins on web mining, the date of social capitalism, Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the web mining Refund Period. Essay Evolution Of The. In case you are not satisfied with any of the Services, you can submit a refund request according to these Terms within the Refund Period. Once the web mining Refund Period elapses, craftanessay.com will not refund any amounts paid. If the order is not completed and/or the Paper is not downloaded or delivered in Essay Evolution of the and America, its complete form by or to you, the full refund is issued at web mining, any time. In the Essay about event of order cancellation, the funds will be debited back only to the account of the initial payment within 5-7 business days from the web mining time of cancellation request. In other case craftanessay.com assesses refund requests on summarise of attachment, a case-by-case basis as there are usually unique reasons as to why a refund request is made. Web Mining. Please note that if you request a refund, we may require documented proof that the quality of your order is define social, low (e.g., scan copy of your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.). Web Mining. Should you feel it necessary to make a refund request, we will immediately forward your order to our Quality Assurance Department. After comparing their findings with the reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period. In case craftanessay.com reimburses the money because of capitalism, mistakes or some irrelevance to web mining the initial instructions, our Quality Assurance Department, at its sole discretion, evaluates the quality of the Paper and refunds an amount comparable to the percentage of incorrect content in the Paper and Applicant’s after Employment, mistakes present in it.

craftanessay.com provides various methods of contact (i.e. email, telephone, message board, and live chat) to facilitate communication between you, us and the writer assigned to complete an order. Using any of web mining, these methods, our Customer Support Center is available to you at any time and will respond to define capitalism any refund request or other issue promptly. However, if such a request is not received using any of the web mining aforementioned methods within the Refund Period, craftanessay.com will not be obliged to honor or consider the above said request. Should the personality disorder cause Paper delivery be delayed due to unexpected circumstances, from the side of craftanessay.com, we may provide compensation for the breach of the order deadline in the form of a credit or a discount to be used towards your next order with us. Please be informed that delivery time deviation is not a subject to web mining refund. Any revision request or complaint in regards to importance a Paper that craftanessay.com has provided must be made within the revision period (“Revision Period”). craftanessay.com offers a 14-day Revision Period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages. Web Mining. Revision Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the Revision Period. After that point, no revision and/or complaint will be accepted. craftanessay.com recognizes that orders vary in size and Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Interview Essay, complexity; as a result, dissertation, thesis and/or other sufficiently large assignment may be granted 30-day Revision Period. Sufficiency in the size of the web mining Paper will be determined by craftanessay.com in Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview, its sole discretion.

In case a request for revision is web mining, not submitted within the Revision Period, craftanessay.com tacitly accepts that the Client is satisfied with the Paper and requires no further actions to be taken in regards to the Paper unless extra payment is provided or a new order is placed. Upon receiving your completed assignment you are entitled to beggars opera a free revision should the web mining Paper fail to meet your instructions or defined the requirements in any way. When this is the case, you are entitled to request as many revisions as may be required to make the Paper consistent and after Undergoing Interview, compliant with your instructions. During the Revision Period the request for revision may be made at any time. All revisions must be based on the original order instructions. If at the time of the revision request you provide new, additional, or differing instructions, this will be interpreted as an application for new Paper and thus, will require an additional payment. Furthermore, should you request a revision after the Revision Period, it will also be considered as a new order requiring an additional payment. We may require you to supply us with personal identifying information, and we may also legally consult other sources to obtain information about web mining you. By accepting these Terms and Conditions, you authorize us to make any inquiries we consider necessary to validate the personality disorder cause information that you provide us with. We may do this directly or by web mining verifying your information against third party databases; or through other sources.

Essentially, verification procedure involves, inter alia, confirming that the order is authentic and Applicant’s after Employment Interview Essay, that the web mining cardholder is aware of charges by placing a phone call to them, and in certain cases by requesting some additional documents to be submitted for verification to our Risk Department. In order to ensure timely delivery of your order, this procedure must be completed quickly and without delay. Therefore, it is vital to provide accurate and valid phone numbers. Failure to verify an order may result in order cancellation or the beggars opera order being placed on hold. You consent to web mining our processing your personal information for Essay Evolution of the and America the purposes of providing the Services, including for web mining verification purposes as set out Applicant’s Undergoing Essay, herein. You also consent to web mining the use of importance intelligence, such data for communicating with you, for statutory and accounting purposes. Web Mining. You acknowledge that you have read and intelligence, consented to web mining craftanessay.com's Privacy Policy. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. craftanessay.com will not be liable to you in relation to the contents of, the use of, or otherwise in connection with, this Website:

for failure to learn the material covered by the Paper; and. for your final grade; and. for the outcome or consequences of multiple personality cause, submission the web mining Paper to any academic institution; and. excludes all liability for damages arising out of or in connection with your use of summarise theories, this Website. The latter includes, without limitation, damage caused to your computer, computer software, systems and programs and the data thereon, or any other direct or indirect, consequential and incidental damages. The Paper provided to you by web mining craftanessay.com remains our property and is the subject to Essay of the copyright and web mining, other intellectual property rights under local and international laws conventions. The Paper is intended for your personal use only and it may not be used, copied, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for personality any other purposes without our prior written consent. You agree not to engage in the use, copying, or distribution of Papers other than expressly permitted herein.

We post Clients` testimonials on web mining, our Website which may contain personal information (first name or initials). Self-Perception Undergoing Interview. Hereby by accessing or using this Website, you provide us with your consent to post your first name/initials along with your testimonial on our Website. Web Mining. We ensure our posting these testimonials does not interfere with your confidentiality. Social Capitalism. If you wish to request the removal of your testimonial, you may contact us at [emailprotected] NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES.

craftanessay.com reserves the right to change these Terms and Conditions at web mining, any time and your continued use of the Website will signify your acceptance of any adjustment, improvements and/or alterations to these Terms and Conditions. You are, therefore, advised to re-read these Terms and define social, Conditions on web mining, a regular basis. This web site is owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd. HEXO+ Self-Flying Camera Drone, with a suggested retail price of $1,249.00 USD («Main prize»). FreePage (single use) SMS inform (single use) Plagiarism Report (single use) 50$ to your bonus balance which you can use in 365 days 100$ to your bonus balance which you can use in 365 days. 2. Promotional Period. The promotion begins on 7.18.2017, at 9:00 am and ends on Essay about and America, 7.28.2017 at 10:00 pm. This Privacy Policy (“Policy”) describes how information about You is web mining, collected, used and beggars opera, disclosed and provides other important privacy information, describes when and how we may change this Policy, and tells You how to contact us with any questions or comments. We collect information about You and web mining, computer(s) You use when You use our Services or otherwise interact with us. “Personal Information” means information that we directly associate with a specific person or entity (for example: name; addresses; telephone numbers; email address; payment information; device location etc.). “Client”, “User”, “You” and “Your” refers to you, the personality cause person accessing this Website and accepting these Privacy Policy.

Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same. HOW INFORMATION ABOUT YOU IS COLLECTED. We collect information about web mining You in three primary ways: Information You Provide. We collect information that You provide to beggars opera us when You apply for and use and/or purchase our Services or otherwise communicate with us. For example, some of the web mining ways You may provide information to us include: When You purchase our Services, the payment system will require your personal, contact, billing and credit information. When You establish or modify Your user account online, We may collect user identification information, passwords, and/or security question responses that You will use for summarise future sign-on. When You interact with our Customer Service representatives, enter information on web mining, our Website, submit survey responses, or pay for Services, we may also collect Personal Information and other information. Beggars Opera. We may monitor and record phone calls, e-mails, live chats, or other communications between You and our Customer Service representatives or other employees or representatives. Information We Collect Automatically.

We automatically collect a variety of web mining, information associated with Your use of our Services. Each time You visit the Website, Personal Information is automatically gathered. In general, this information does not identify You personally. Examples of automatically collected personal information include, but are not limited to: IP address, Collection Date, Publisher Name, Connection Speed, Day of Week Time of Day (hour), Language settings, Country, City (relating to IP address, if available). For example, some of the ways we may automatically collect information include: Cookies and similar technologies. A “cookie” is multiple personality cause, a small text file that a web site can place on Your computer's hard drive in order, for example, to collect information about Your activities on the Website. The cookie transmits this information back to the Website's computer, which, generally speaking, is the only computer that can read it. We need to use cookies on the Website to web mining enhance the user experience and avoid multiple logins or password authentication requests.

We may use, or we may engage third-parties to use on importance of emotional, our behalf, cookies or similar web tags (small data text files placed on web mining, your computer or device) or similar technologies to identify Your computer or device and record Your preferences and summarise theories, other data so that our Website can personalize Your visit(s), see which areas and features of our Website are popular, and web mining, improve our Website and Your experience. Depending upon Your computer, You may be able to set Your browser(s) to reject cookies or delete cookies, but that may result in the loss of some functionality on the Website. We may also use web beacons (small graphic images on define social, a web page or an HTML e-mail) to monitor interaction with our websites or e-mails. Web beacons are generally invisible because they are very small (only 1-by-1 pixel) and the same color as the background of the web page or e-mail message. Web Browsing Activity. When accessing our Website, We automatically collect certain information about Your computer and Your visit, such as your IP address, browser type, date and time, the web page You visited before visiting our Website, Your activities and purchases on our Website, and other analytical information associated with the Website. Information From Other Sources. We may also obtain information about You from web mining other sources. Theories Of Attachment. For example, We may receive credit information from third-party sources before initiating Your service. We may also purchase or obtain Personal Information (for example, e-mail lists, postal mail lists, demographic and marketing data) from web mining others.

HOW WE USE INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU. We use the information We collect for of emotional intelligence a variety of business purposes, such as: To provide and bill for web mining Services You purchase; To deliver and confirm Services You obtain from importance of emotional us; To verify Your identity and maintain a record of Your transactions and interactions with us;

To provide customer services to You; To create, modify, improve, enhance, remove or fix our Services and their performance; To identify and web mining, suggest products or services that might interest You; To make internal business decisions about Applicant’s Undergoing Employment Interview current and future Service offerings; To provide You customized user experiences, including personalized Services offerings; To protect our rights, interests, safety and property and that of our customers, service providers and other third parties; and. To comply with law or as required for legal purposes. We may use Personal Information for investigations or prevention of fraud or network abuse. We may use information we collect to contact You about web mining our and/or third-party products, services, and offers that We believe You may find of interest. We may contact You by telephone, postal mail, e-mail, or other methods.

You may see advertisements when You visit our Website. We may help advertisers better reach our customers by providing certain customer information, including geographic information, language preferences or demographic information obtained from beggars opera other companies. This information is used by advertisers to determine which ads may be more relevant to You. However, we do not share Personal Information outside of web mining, our corporate family for advertising purposes without Your consent. WHEN WE SHARE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. We do not sell, license, rent, or otherwise provide Your Personal Information to unaffiliated third-parties (parties outside our corporate family) without Your consent. Summarise. We may, however, disclose Your information to unaffiliated third-parties as follows: With Your Consent.

We may disclose Personal Information about You to third-parties with Your consent. We may obtain Your consent in writing; online, through “click-through” agreements; when You accept the terms of web mining, disclosures for social certain Services; orally, when You interact with our customer service representatives. We encourage You not to share Your password. If You provide Your user account password and/or security question responses to third parties they will have access to Your Personal Information when they access Your user account with Your account password. To Our Service Providers. We may disclose information to third-party vendors and partners who complete transactions or perform services on our behalf (for example, credit/debit card processing, billing, customer service, auditing, and marketing). In a Business Transfer. We may sell, disclose, or transfer information about You as part of a corporate business transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, joint venture, corporate reorganization, financing, or sale of company assets, or in the unlikely event of web mining, insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership, in which such information could be transferred to define social capitalism third-parties as a business asset in the transaction. For Legal Process Protection. We may disclose Personal Information, and other information about You, or Your communications, where we have a good faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of web mining, such information is reasonably necessary:

to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request; to enforce or apply agreements, or initiate, render, bill, and collect for multiple cause services and products (including to collection agencies in order to obtain payment for our products and services); to protect our rights or interests, or property or safety or that of others; in connection with claims, disputes, or litigation – in web mining, court or elsewhere; to facilitate or verify the of the Gangster and America appropriate calculation of taxes, fees, or other obligations; or. in an emergency situation.

We may provide information that does not identify You personally to third-parties for marketing, advertising or other purposes. HOW WE STORE AND PROTECT THE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. Protecting Your Information. We use a variety of physical, electronic, and web mining, procedural safeguards to protect Personal Information from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure while it is under our control. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the internet can be guaranteed to be completely secure. As a result, although we will utilize such measures, we do not guarantee You against the loss, misuse, or alteration of Personal Information under our control, and You provide Personal Information to importance of emotional us at web mining, Your own risk. You should always take care with how You handle and summarise theories of attachment, disclose your Personal Information and should avoid sending Personal Information through insecure e-mail, social networks or other internet channels. Retention and web mining, Disposal.

We retain information only for as long as we have a business or tax need or as applicable laws, regulations and/or government orders allow. When we dispose of Personal Information, we use reasonable procedures designed to erase or render it unreadable (for example, shredding documents and wiping electronic media). PRIVACY POLICY UPDATES. How We Communicate Changes to This Policy. We may update this Policy at any time to provide updates to or clarification of our practices. If we make changes we may provide You with additional notice (such as adding a statement to the homepage of our Website or sending You a notification). You should refer to this Policy often for the latest information and the effective date of any changes. This web site is owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd . A Partner is an individual who refers customers. A Referral is an individual who requests a service via the referral link given by a Partner. With the first order, a Referral acquires a 15% discount on summarise theories of attachment, the order, while a Partner receives $50 to the Referral Balance.

With further purchases, a Partner earns 5% of the web mining Referral’s total order price. All money earned with the social capitalism Referral Program is stored on your Referral Balance. A Partner can transfer the money to the Bonus Balance and use it to purchase a service. Web Mining. It is possible to transfer the Applicant’s after Employment Essay sum to the Partner’s PayPal account (no less than $20).

Buying essays online -
Web Mining: интеллектуальный анализ данных в сети Internet

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, order essay and get it on time -
Web Mining — анализ использования веб-ресурсов Построение

43 Resume Tips That Will Help You Get Hired. When you haven’t updated your resume in a while, it can be hard to know where to start. What experiences and accomplishments should you include for web mining the jobs you’ve got your eye on? What new resume rules and trends should you be following? And seriously, one page or two? Well, search no more: We’ve compiled all the define capitalism resume advice you need into one place. Web Mining? Read on Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Employment Essay for tips and tricks that’ll make sure you craft a winning resume—and help you land a job. Your resume should not have every work experience you’ve ever had listed on it. Think of your resume not as a comprehensive list of your career history, but as a marketing document selling you as the perfect person for web mining the job.

For each resume you send out, you’ll want to highlight only the accomplishments and summarise theories of attachment skills that are most relevant to the job at hand (even if that means you don’t include all of your experience). Web Mining? Job search expert Lily Zhang explains more about Essay Gangster what it means to web mining, tailor your resume here . Summarise Theories Of Attachment? 2. But Keep a Master List of All Jobs. Since you’ll want to web mining, be swapping different information in and out depending on the job you’re applying to, keep a resume master list on your computer where you keep any information you’ve ever included on a resume: old positions, bullet points tailored for different applications, special projects that only sometimes make sense to include. Then, when you’re crafting each resume, it’s just a matter of cutting and pasting relevant information together. Think of this as your brag file . 3. Put the Best Stuff “Above the Fold” In marketing speak, “above the fold” refers to what you see on the front half of a folded newspaper (or, in the digital age, before you scroll down on a website), but basically it’s your first impression of a document. Evolution Of The? In resume speak, it means you should make sure your best experiences and accomplishments are visible on the top third of your resume.

This top section is what the web mining hiring manager is going to Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview, see first—and what will serve as a hook for someone to web mining, keep on about Evolution Gangster and America reading. Web Mining? So focus on putting your best, most relevant experiences first—and then check out these five other marketing tricks to get your resume noticed . According to define social, Zhang , the only occasion when an objective section makes sense is when you’re making a huge career change and web mining need to explain from the summarise theories get-go why your experience doesn’t match up with the position you’re applying to. In every other case? Consider whether a summary statement would be right for you —or just nix it altogether to save space and focus on making the rest of your resume stellar. There are lots of different ways to organize the information on web mining your resume, but the personality good old reverse chronological (where your most recent experience is listed first) is still your best bet. Unless it’s absolutely necessary in your situation, skip the skills-based resume—hiring managers might wonder what you’re hiding. The two- (or more!) page resume is a hotly debated topic , but the bottom line is this—you want the information here to web mining, be concise, and making yourself keep it to one page is a good way to force yourself to do this. If you truly have enough relevant and important experience, training, and importance of emotional credentials to showcase on more than one page of your resume, then go for it. But if you can tell the same story in less space?

Do. If you’re struggling, check out these tips for web mining cutting your content down , or work with a designer to see how you can organize your resume to fit more in less space. Can’t figure out how to Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Interview, tell your whole story on one page, or want to be able to include some visual examples of your work? Instead of trying to have your resume cover everything, cover the most important details on that document, and then include a link to your personal website , where you can dive more into what makes you the ideal candidate. We’ll talk about getting creative in order to stand out in a minute. But the most basic principle of good resume formatting and design? Keep it simple. Use a basic but modern font, like Helvetica, Arial, or Century Gothic. Make your resume easy on hiring managers’ eyes by using a font size between 10 and 12 and leaving a healthy amount of white space on the page.

You can use a different font or typeface for your name, your resume headers, and the companies for which you’ve worked, but keep it simple and keep it consistent. Web Mining? Your main focus here should be on cause readability for the hiring manager. That being said, you should feel free to… Really want your resume stand out from the sea of Times New Roman? Yes, creative resumes—like infographics, videos, or presentations—or resumes with icons or graphics can set you apart, but you should use them thoughtfully. If you’re applying through an ATS, keep to the standard formatting without any bells and whistles so the web mining computer can read it effectively. If you’re applying to a more traditional company, don’t get too crazy, but feel free to add some tasteful design elements or a little color to make it pop. No matter what, don’t do it unless you’re willing to put in the time, creativity, and define social capitalism design work to make it awesome. 10.

Make Your Contact Info Prominent. You don’t need to web mining, include your address on your resume anymore (really!), but you do need to make sure to Interview Essay, include a phone number and web mining professional email address (not your work address!) as well as other places the hiring manager can find you on the web, like your LinkedIn profile and Twitter handle. (Implicit in social capitalism, this is that you keep these social media profiles suitable for web mining prospective employers.) You’ve heard before that hiring managers don’t spend a lot of time on each individual resume. So help them get as much information as possible, in as little time as possible. These 12 small formatting changes will make a huge difference. Know that design skills aren’t your strong suit but want your resume to of attachment, look stunning? There’s no shame in web mining, getting help, so consider working with a professional resume designer. This is arguably the most important document of your job search, so it’s worth getting it exactly right! 13. Keep it Recent, Keep it Relevant. As a rule, you should only show the most recent 10-15 years of your career history and personality disorder cause only include the experience relevant to the positions to which you are applying.

And remember to allocate real estate on your resume according to importance. If there’s a choice between including one more college internship or going into web mining, more detail about your current role, always choose the about Evolution of the Gangster and America latter (unless a previous job was more relevant to the one you’re applying to). Web Mining? 14. No Relevant Experience? No Worries! Don’t panic if you don’t have any experience that fits the bill. Instead, Zhang explains , focus your resume on your relevant and transferrable skills along with any related side or academic projects, and theories of attachment then make sure to pair it with a strong cover letter telling the web mining narrative of why you’re ideal for the job. About Evolution Of The And America? No matter how long you’ve been in a job, or how much you’ve accomplished there, you shouldn’t have more than five or six bullets in web mining, a given section. No matter how good your bullets are, the recruiter just isn’t going to get through them. Check out importance intelligence these tips for writing impressive bullet points . Web Mining? You may be tempted to summarise theories, throw in tons of industry jargon so you sound like you know what you’re talking about, but ultimately you want your resume to be understandable to web mining, the average person. Remember that the first person who sees your resume might be a recruiter, an assistant, or even a high-level executive—and you want to be sure that it is readable, relevant, and interesting to all of them.

Use as many facts, figures, and numbers as you can in your bullet points. How many people were impacted by your work? By what percentage did you exceed your goals? By quantifying your accomplishments, you really allow the hiring manager to importance intelligence, picture the level of work or responsibility you needed to achieve them. Even if you don’t actually work with numbers, here are some secrets to adding more to your resume . Web Mining? People hire performers, so you want to show that you didn’t just do stuff, but that you got stuff done! As you look at your bullet points, think about how you can take each statement one step further and beggars opera add in what the web mining benefit was to your boss or your company. By doing this, you clearly communicate not only what you’re capable of, but also the direct benefit the define capitalism employer will receive by hiring you. If you’re not sure how to explain your impact, check out these tips for turning your duties into accomplishments . Describing soft skills on a resume often starts to sound like a list of meaningless buzzwords, fast. But being a “strong leader” or an web mining, “effective communicator” are important characteristics you want to get across. Importance Of Emotional? Think about how you can demonstrate these attributes in web mining, your bullet points without actually saying them. Zhang demonstrates here how you can show five different qualities with the beggars opera same bullet point—try it yourself until you get the result you’re going for!

20. Web Mining? Don’t Neglect Non-Traditional Work. Applicant’s After Undergoing Interview? There’s no law that says you can only put full-time or paid work on your resume. So, if you’ve participated in a major volunteer role, worked part-time, were hired as a temporary or contract worker , freelanced, or blogged? Absolutely list these things as their own “jobs” within your career chronology.

If every bullet in your resume starts with “Responsible for,” readers will get bored very quickly. Use our handy list of better verbs to mix it up ! Use keywords in your resume: Scan the job description, see what words are used most often, and make sure you’ve included them in web mining, your bullet points. Summarise Theories Of Attachment? Not only is this a self-check that you’re targeting your resume to the job, it’ll make sure you get noticed in applicant tracking systems. Stuck on which words to include? Dump the web mining job description into a tool like TagCrowd , which will analyze and spit out the most used keywords.

What words shouldn’t you include? Detail-oriented, team player, and hard worker—among other vague terms that recruiters say are chronically overused . We bet there’s a better way to describe how awesome you are. 24. Experience First, Education Second. Unless you’re a recent graduate, put your education after your experience. Chances are, your last couple of jobs are more important and relevant to you getting the importance intelligence job than where you went to college. 25.

Also Keep it Reverse Chronological. Usually, you should lay down your educational background by listing the most recent or advanced degree first, working in reverse chronological order. But if older coursework is more specific to web mining, the job, list that first to grab the Self-Perception after Undergoing Interview Essay reviewer’s attention. Don’t list your graduation dates. The reviewer cares more about whether or not you have the degree than when you earned it. If you graduated from web mining college with high honors, absolutely make note of it. While you don’t need to of attachment, list your GPA, don’t be afraid to web mining, showcase that summa cum laude status or the fact that you were in the honors college at your university. 28. Include Continuing or Online Education. Don’t be afraid to include continuing education, professional development coursework, or online courses in about Evolution Gangster, your education section, especially if it feels a little light. Kelli Orrela explains , “Online courses are a more-than-accepted norm nowadays, and your participation in them can actually show your determination and web mining motivation to get the skills you need for your career.”

Be sure to add a section that lists out all the relevant skills you have for a position, including tech skills like HTML and Adobe Creative Suite and theories any industry-related certifications. Just make sure to skip including skills that everyone is expected to have, like using email or Microsoft Word. Doing so will actually make you seem less technologically savvy. Web Mining? If you have lots of skills related to a position—say, foreign language, software, and leadership skills—try breaking out one of those sections and Gangster and America listing it on its own. Web Mining? Below your “Skills” section, add another section titled “Language Skills” or “Software Skills,” and detail your experience there. Again—we’re going for skimmability here, folks! Feel free to beggars opera, include an “Interests” section on web mining your resume, but only add those that are relevant to the job. Are you a guitar player with your eye on a music company? Definitely include it.

But including your scrapbooking hobby for a tech job at a healthcare company? Don’t even think about it. 32. Beware of Interests That Could Be Controversial. Maybe you help raise money for your church on the reg. Or perhaps you have a penchant for canvassing during political campaigns. Yes, these experiences show a good amount of work ethic—but they could also be discriminated against by multiple personality cause someone who disagrees with the cause. Zhang explains here how to weigh the decision of whether to web mining, include them or not. Do include awards and accolades you’ve received, even if they’re company-specific awards. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing Employment Essay? Just state what you earned them for, e.g., “Earned Gold Award for having the web mining company’s top sales record four quarters in a row.” What about personal achievements—like running a marathon—that aren’t totally relevant but show you’re a driven, hard worker?

Zhang shares the proper ways to include them. Gaps and social Other Sticky Resume Situations. If you stayed at a (non-temporary) job for only a matter of web mining, months, consider eliminating it from beggars opera your resume. According to The New York Times ’ career coach , leaving a particularly short-lived job or two off your work history shouldn’t hurt, as long as you’re honest about web mining your experience if asked in of emotional, an interview. If you have gaps of a few months in web mining, your work history, don’t list the usual start and end dates for each position. Use years only (2010-2012), or just the of attachment number of web mining, years or months you worked at your earlier positions. Multiple Disorder? If you’ve job-hopped frequently, include a reason for leaving next to each position, with a succinct explanation like “company closed,” “layoff due to downsizing,” or “relocated to web mining, new city.” By addressing the theories gaps, you’ll proactively illustrate the reason for your sporadic job movement and make it less of an web mining, issue. Beggars Opera? Re-entering the workforce after a long hiatus? This is the perfect opportunity for web mining a summary statement at the top, outlining your best skills and accomplishments.

Then, get into your career chronology, without hesitating to about Evolution Gangster, include part-time or volunteer work. See more tips from web mining Jenny Foss for killing it on your comeback resume. Don’t try to creatively fill in gaps on importance of emotional intelligence your resume. For example, if you took time out web mining of the workforce to raise kids, don’t list your parenting experience on your resume, a la “adeptly managed the growing pile of laundry” (we’ve seen it). While parenting is as demanding and intense a job as any out there, most corporate decision makers aren’t going to take this section of your resume seriously. 39. Disorder? Ditch “References Available Upon Request” If a hiring manager is interested in you, he or she will ask you for references—and will assume that you have them. Web Mining? There’s no need to address the obvious (and doing so might even make you look a little presumptuous!). It should go without saying, but make sure your resume is free and clear of typos. Essay Evolution And America? And don’t rely on spell check and grammar check alone—ask family or friends to web mining, take a look at it for you (or get some tips from an editor on how to of the Gangster, perfect your own work ). If emailing your resume, make sure to always send a PDF rather than a .doc.

That way all of web mining, your careful formatting won’t accidentally get messed up when the hiring manager opens it on Applicant’s after Undergoing Essay his or her computer. To make sure it won’t look wonky when you send it off, Google’s head of HR Laszlo Bock suggests, “Look at it in both Google Docs and Word, and then attach it to an email and web mining open it as a preview.” Ready to beggars opera, save your resume and send it off? Save it as “Jane Smith Resume” instead of “Resume.” It’s one less step the hiring manager has to take. Carve out web mining some time every quarter or so to pull up your resume and make some updates.

Have you taken on new responsibilities? Learned new skills? Add them in. When your resume is updated on a regular basis, you’re ready to pounce when opportunity presents itself. And, even if you’re not job searching, there are plenty of good reasons to keep this document in tip-top shape. Photo courtesy of Hero Images / Getty Images . Erin Greenawald is a freelance writer, editor, and content strategist who is passionate about Essay Evolution of the elevating the web mining standard of writing on the web. Evolution Of The Gangster And America? Erin previously helped build The Muse’s beloved daily publication and led the company’s branded content team. If you’re an individual or company looking for help making your content better—or you just want to web mining, go out to tea—get in beggars opera, touch at eringreenawald.com. Hmmm, seems you#39;ve already signed up for this class.

While you#39;re here, you may as well check out all the amazing companies that are hiring like crazy right now.

Write My Research Paper -
Web Mining: интеллектуальный анализ данных в сети Internet

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, write my essay -
Web mining — Википедия

dessay height Drunk Driving is web mining a serious offense. Dui Assistant can help you find a true Driving While Intoxicated lawyer or DUI law Firm to protect your legal rights and defend you from cause a Drunk Driving related Charge. A Drunk Driving Conviction can lead to web mining, loss of employment, substantial civil penalties, fines, jail time, probation, forced rehabilitation, loss of your vehicle, loss if income, loss of social capitalism insurance and other serious consequences. Massachusetts DUI and Massachusetts OUI Violations – Here is the Law.

Massachusetts DUI Laws. It is web mining illegal to drive or operate a motor vehicle in Massachusetts, if you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. According to Massachusetts DUI law, a person is considered too impaired to operate a vehicle if his blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08% or greater. If a driver is under the age of 21, he or she is prohibited from driving if his or her BAC is higher than .02%. Any driver in Boston or throughout the state of Massachusetts found driving with a BAC at personality cause, or above the legal limit will be arrested and web mining, booked on DUI charges. At this time, it’s best to contact a seasoned Boston DUI lawyer who has the experience and skill to defend you in court. Social Capitalism! Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement authorities have no tolerance for people who drive under the influence, and web mining, always prosecute those people in court. There are defenses to a Massachusetts DUI and Massachusetts OUI Offense: For example, improper administration of roadside tests, mistakes in the arresting officer’s subjective conclusions regarding your coordination and stability, and the inaccuracy of breathalyzer machines. Field sobriety tests, for example, are not reliable indicators of intoxication. Especially when asked to perform them at night, on the shoulder of the road, in theories of attachment the cold, in the glaring squad car headlights.

We have had success in getting charges dismissed or reduced, or obtaining not guilty verdicts at trial, representing professionals, college students, underage drivers and every type of client. Massachusetts encourages first time offenders with no criminal record to plead out in a diversion program. The case is dismissed after mandatory alcohol education classes and one year of probation and, and you can get a hardship driver’s license within four days of the plea hearing. A second DUI is harsher, and web mining, often requires going to intelligence, trial. A second offense is punished by a minimum of two weeks in an alcohol facility and a 60-day suspended sentence, two-year license revocation with no hardship license for web mining six months. A third DUI is punished with no less than 150 days of mandatory jail time, eight year license revocation, with no hardship license considered for two years. Massachusetts OUI/DUI Law – First Offense Penalty.

•Jail: Not more than 2 1/2 years House of Correction. •License suspended for define social 1 year; work/education hardship considered in web mining 3 months; general hardship in 6 months. Alternative Disposition (1st Offense OUI) •Plead to Continuance without a Finding aka CWOF. It is similar to, but not technically a guilty plea. (More info on a CWOF.) •Pay a number of fines and court fees (over $2500 in total), as well as take a hit to your insurance. •Unsupervised probation for one year. •Mandatory participation in 16 week (1 hour) alcohol-drug education (DAE) program paid for by defendant. •License suspended for 45 to 90 days (not including any penalty for breath test refusal) •License suspension is 210 days for drivers under age 21. •You are eligible for importance intelligence a hardship license right away, in most cases. The Real Deal on First Offense OUI Penalties:

The minimum penalty (above) is web mining almost always available for a first offense DUI/OUI plea, if your lawyer has OUI defense experience and knows what to ask for, and as long as there is no accident, injury, or other extenuating circumstances. Of Emotional! In addition, a smart attorney will include all other charges in the plea deal, including civil speeding ticket/moving violations as part of the same penalty, saving you fines and insurance increases. Massachusetts OUI Law – Second Offense Penalty. •Jail: Not less than 60 days (30 day mandatory), not more then 2 1/2 years. •License suspended for 2 years, work/education hardship considered in 1 year; general hardship in 18 months. Web Mining! (Note: In almost every case, with a breath test refusal or failure you won’t be eligible for a hardship or full license restoration for at multiple cause, least 3 years total.) •As of January 1, 2006 – Interlock device installed in web mining your car at your own expense for 2 years, when you become eligible for hardship or license reinstatement.

Alternative Disposition (2nd Offense OUI) •2 years probation. •14 day confined (inpatient) alcohol treatment program paid for by the defendant. •License suspended for two years, work/education hardship considered in 1 year; general hardship in 18 months. •As of January 1, 2006 – Interlock device installed in your car at your own expense for 2 years as a condition of any license reinstatement (including hardship license). •If your prior offense is over 10 years ago, you may be eligible for a 24D disposition, which would only beggars opera be the web mining, penalties of a first offense. The Registry, however, would still treat you as a 2nd offender for license reinstatement. The Real Deal on 2nd Offense OUI Penalties: See my second offense OUI penalties page for detail on the implications of a 2nd offense drunk driving defense.

I can almost always negotiate for the Alternative Disposition above for any second offense OUI conviction, but it is still a tough punishment to accept for many people. Given that there isn’t that much risk of a worse outcome if you choose to fight the case in court, most people choose to take a chance at no penalty, even on a weak case. Remember, even if the Undergoing Employment Interview, prior is in another state, or decades old, you will be forced to get an web mining interlock device installed in your car as a condition of license reinstatement. The Registry is define capitalism harsh on this point, and there is nothing any lawyer can do about web mining it. If you are facing a 2nd offense DUI, this in social capitalism itself is a good reason to strongly consider fighting the case. Massachusetts OUI/DWI Law – Third Offense Penalty(3rd) Penalty. •Jail: Not less than 180 days (150 day mandatory), not more than 5 years State Prison (felony status) •May be served in a prison treatment program. •License suspended for 8 years, work/education hardship considered in 2 years; general hardship in web mining 4 years. •Commonwealth may seize, keep, and/or sell your vehicle. The Real Deal on 3rd Offense OUI Penalties:

For any third offense OUI conviction, you are facing a mandatory 5-6 months in jail if found guilty. For a 3rd offense charge, this is a good reason to multiple cause, fight the case and web mining, look for a chance to win and avoid jail time. It usually only makes sense to work out a deal if jail time is off the table, which only happens if the court can’t provide sufficient proof of the prior offenses (This can happen if prior DUI convictions are are old, or out of state.) More on third offense DUI charge strategies. MASSACHUSETTS OUI LAW FOURTH OFFENSE (4th) Penalties. •Jail: Not less than 2 years (1 year minimum mandatory), not more than 5 years in beggars opera State Prison (4th Offense OUI is a Felony Offense) •License suspended for 10 years, work/education hardship considered in 5 years; general hardship in 8 years. •Commonwealth may seize, keep, and/or sell your vehicle.

The Real Deal on 4th Offense OUI Penalties: Everything about a 3rd offense applies to a 4th, 5th or subsequent drunk driving charge. Even a small chance of winning the case is worth the risk, since it is web mining probably your only chance to avoid jail time. You need to define social capitalism, consider fighting your case at trial in almost all cases. MASSACHUSETTS OUI/DUI LAWS – FIFTH OFFENSE (5th) Penalty. •Jail: Not less than 2 1/2 years (24 mos. minimum mandatory), not more than 5 years (felony status) •License Revoked/Suspended for web mining life, no possibility of a hardship license. If convicted on a sixth or subsequent OUI offense, the Applicant’s Self-Perception Essay, punishment and mandatory jail time you are risking if found guilty will even longer. Call me for details.

OUI With Serious Bodily Injury – Penalties. If you are charged with an web mining OUI where someone is Gangster injured, you are almost certain to do jail time. The cases become extremely complicated and you need the advice of a DUI OUI lawyer. You can face penalties of 6 months to 2.5 years in jail or 6 months to 10 years in web mining State Prison depending on how your DUI or OUI violation is charged and prosecuted. Here is a copy of the Massachusetts DUI and of emotional, OUI Laws. Section 24. (1) (a) (1) Whoever, upon any way or in web mining any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle with a percentage, by weight, of alcohol in their blood of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the Essay of the and America, influence of intoxicating liquor, or of web mining marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in section one of chapter ninety-four C, or the vapors of glue shall be punished by a fine of Applicant’s after Undergoing not less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not more than two and one-half years, or both such fine and imprisonment.

There shall be an assessment of web mining $250 against a person who is convicted of, is placed on probation for, or is summarise theories granted a continuance without a finding for web mining or otherwise pleads guilty to or admits to a finding of sufficient facts of beggars opera operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances under this section; provided, however, that but $150 of the amount collected under this assessment shall be deposited monthly by the court with the state treasurer for who shall deposit it into the Head Injury Treatment Services Trust Fund, and the remaining amount of the assessment shall be credited to the General Fund. The assessment shall not be subject to reduction or waiver by the court for any reason. There shall be an assessment of $50 against a person who is convicted, placed on probation or granted a continuance without a finding or who otherwise pleads guilty to or admits to a finding of sufficient facts for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or under the web mining, influence of marihuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined by section 1 of chapter 94C, pursuant to social, this section or section 24D or 24E or subsection (a) or (b) of web mining section 24G or section 24L. The assessment shall not be subject to waiver by the court for any reason. If a person against whom a fine is multiple cause assessed is sentenced to a correctional facility and the assessment has not been paid, the court shall note the assessment on the mittimus. The monies collected pursuant to the fees established by this paragraph shall be transmitted monthly by the courts to web mining, the state treasurer who shall then deposit, invest and after Interview Essay, transfer the web mining, monies, from time to time, into the Victims of Drunk Driving Trust Fund established in section 66 of chapter 10. The monies shall then be administered, pursuant to said section 66 of said chapter 10, by the victim and witness assistance board for the purposes set forth in of attachment said section 66. Web Mining! Fees paid by personality disorder cause, an individual into the Victims of Drunk Driving Trust Fund pursuant to this section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other fee imposed by the court pursuant to this chapter or any other chapter. The administrative office of the trial court shall file a report detailing the amount of web mining funds imposed and beggars opera, collected pursuant to this section to web mining, the house and senate committees on ways and means and to the victim and witness assistance board not later than August 15 of each calendar year. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation preceding the date of the intelligence, commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, the web mining, defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than six hundred nor more than ten thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than sixty days nor more than two and one-half years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than thirty days, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for good conduct until such person has served thirty days of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on the recommendation of the warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the Essay about of the Gangster, administrator of web mining a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of of emotional a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the recovery of an web mining offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of such thirty day sentence to the extent such resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for multiple disorder cause the incarceration and rehabilitation of drinking drivers.

If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the web mining, commonwealth, or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense two times preceding the summarise theories of attachment, date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand nor more than fifteen thousand dollars and by imprisonment for not less than one hundred and eighty days nor more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not less than one thousand nor more than fifteen thousand dollars and by imprisonment in web mining the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the define social capitalism, sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than one hundred and fifty days, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for good conduct until he shall have served one hundred and web mining, fifty days of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on the recommendation of the warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the personality disorder, administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to web mining, an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in the custody of an officer of such institution for of the Gangster the following purposes only: to attend the web mining, funeral of a relative, to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the recovery of an offender who has completed an personality disorder alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the web mining, defendant may serve all or part of such one hundred and fifty days sentence to the extent such resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of beggars opera drinking drivers. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense three times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted the defendant shall be punished by a fine of web mining not less than one thousand five hundred nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars and by imprisonment for beggars opera not less than two years nor more than two and web mining, one-half years, or by a fine of not less than one thousand five hundred nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars and by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the after Employment Interview, sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than twelve months, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for web mining good conduct until such person has served twelve months of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of capitalism correction may, on the recommendation of the web mining, warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in Applicant’s after Essay the custody of an web mining officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Employment Essay a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the recovery of an offender who has completed an web mining alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of importance of emotional such twelve months sentence to the extent that resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of drinking drivers. If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense four or more times preceding the date of the commission of the offense for web mining which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than two thousand nor more than fifty thousand dollars and by beggars opera, imprisonment for not less than two and one-half years or by a fine of not less than two thousand nor more than fifty thousand dollars and by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years; provided, however, that the sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than twenty-four months, nor suspended, nor shall any such person be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence for good conduct until he shall have served twenty-four months of such sentence; provided, further, that the commissioner of web mining correction may, on the recommendation of the warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in beggars opera the custody of an officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of web mining a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at personality disorder, said institution; to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program; or for the purposes of an aftercare program designed to support the web mining, recovery of an offender who has completed an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program operated by the department of correction; and Essay of the Gangster and America, provided, further, that the defendant may serve all or part of web mining such twenty-four months sentence to the extent that resources are available in a correctional facility specifically designated by the department of correction for the incarceration and rehabilitation of about of the Gangster and America drinking drivers. A prosecution commenced under the provisions of this subparagraph shall not be placed on file or continued without a finding except for dispositions under section twenty-four D. No trial shall be commenced on a complaint alleging a violation of this subparagraph, nor shall any plea be accepted on such complaint, nor shall the prosecution on such complaint be transferred to another division of the district court or to a jury-of-six session, until the court receives a report from the commissioner of probation pertaining to the defendant’s record, if any, of prior convictions of such violations or of web mining assignment to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program because of a like offense; provided, however, that the importance, provisions of this paragraph shall not justify the postponement of any such trial or of the web mining, acceptance of any such plea for more than five working days after the date of the defendant’s arraignment. The commissioner of probation shall give priority to beggars opera, requests for such records. At any time before the commencement of web mining a trial or acceptance of a plea on a complaint alleging a violation of this subparagraph, the prosecutor may apply for the issuance of a new complaint pursuant to section thirty-five A of chapter two hundred and eighteen alleging a violation of this subparagraph and one or more prior like violations. Evolution Gangster! If such application is made, upon motion of the prosecutor, the court shall stay further proceedings on the original complaint pending the determination of the application for the new complaint.

If a new complaint is issued, the court shall dismiss the original complaint and web mining, order that further proceedings on the new complaint be postponed until the define, defendant has had sufficient time to prepare a defense. If a defendant waives right to a jury trial pursuant to section twenty-six A of web mining chapter two hundred and eighteen on a complaint under this subdivision he shall be deemed to summarise, have waived his right to a jury trial on all elements of said complaint. (2) Except as provided in web mining subparagraph (4) the provisions of section eighty-seven of chapter two hundred and Self-Perception after Undergoing Interview, seventy-six shall not apply to web mining, any person charged with a violation of subparagraph (1) and if said person has been convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the commission of the offense with which he is charged. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of importance intelligence section six A of chapter two hundred and seventy-nine, the court may order that a defendant convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) be imprisoned only on designated weekends, evenings or holidays; provided, however, that the provisions of web mining this subparagraph shall apply only to a defendant who has not been convicted previously of such violation or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program preceding the date of the personality disorder cause, commission of the offense for which he has been convicted. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (1) and (2), a judge, before imposing a sentence on a defendant who pleads guilty to or is found guilty of a violation of subparagraph (1) and web mining, who has not been convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like offense two or more times of the date of the of emotional intelligence, commission of the web mining, offense for beggars opera which he has been convicted, shall receive a report from the probation department of a copy of the defendant’s driving record, the criminal record of the defendant, if any, and such information as may be available as to the defendant’s use of alcohol and may, upon a written finding that appropriate and web mining, adequate treatment is available to the defendant and disorder cause, the defendant would benefit from such treatment and web mining, that the Essay about of the, safety of the public would not be endangered, with the defendant’s consent place a defendant on probation for two years; provided, however, that a condition for such probation shall be that the defendant be confined for no less than fourteen days in a residential alcohol treatment program and to participate in an out patient counseling program designed for such offenders as provided or sanctioned by web mining, the division of Applicant’s Self-Perception after alcoholism, pursuant to regulations to web mining, be promulgated by said division in consultation with the Essay Gangster and America, department of correction and with the approval of the web mining, secretary of health and human services or at any other facility so sanctioned or regulated as may be established by the commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof for the purpose of alcohol or drug treatment or rehabilitation, and comply with all conditions of said residential alcohol treatment program. Such condition of probation shall specify a date before which such residential alcohol treatment program shall be attended and completed.

Failure of the defendant to comply with said conditions and any other terms of probation as imposed under this section shall be reported forthwith to the court and about Evolution Gangster and America, proceedings under the web mining, provisions of section three of chapter two hundred and seventy-nine shall be commenced. In such proceedings, such defendant shall be taken before the court and if the court finds that he has failed to attend or complete the importance of emotional intelligence, residential alcohol treatment program before the date specified in the conditions of probation, the court shall forthwith specify a second date before which such defendant shall attend or complete such program, and unless such defendant shows extraordinary and compelling reasons for such failure, shall forthwith sentence him to web mining, imprisonment for not less than two days; provided, however, that such sentence shall not be reduced to less than two days, nor suspended, nor shall such person be eligible for furlough or receive any reduction from Evolution of the and America his sentence for good conduct until such person has served two days of such sentence; and provided, further, that the commissioner of correction may, on web mining the recommendation of the warden, superintendent, or other person in define capitalism charge of a correctional institution, or of the administrator of web mining a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this subdivision a temporary release in summarise theories the custody of an officer of web mining such institution for the following purposes only: to attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution; or to engage in employment pursuant to a work release program. If such defendant fails to attend or complete the residential alcohol treatment program before the second date specified by the court, further proceedings pursuant to said section three of said chapter two hundred and seventy-nine shall be commenced, and the court shall forthwith sentence the of emotional intelligence, defendant to web mining, imprisonment for not less than thirty days as provided in subparagraph (1) for multiple disorder cause such a defendant. The defendant shall pay for web mining the cost of the services provided by the residential alcohol treatment program; provided, however, that no person shall be excluded from said programs for inability to pay; and beggars opera, provided, further, that such person files with the court, an affidavit of indigency or inability to pay and web mining, that investigation by the probation officer confirms such indigency or establishes that payment of such fee would cause a grave and serious hardship to such individual or to the family of such individual, and that the court enters a written finding thereof. In lieu of waiver of the entire amount of define social said fee, the court may direct such individual to make partial or installment payments of the cost of said program. (b) A conviction of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) shall revoke the license or right to operate of the person so convicted unless such person has not been convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the date of the commission of the offense for web mining which he has been convicted, and beggars opera, said person qualifies for disposition under section twenty-four D and has consented to probation as provided for web mining in said section twenty-four D; provided, however, that no appeal, motion for new trial or exceptions shall operate to stay the revocation of the license or the of attachment, right to operate. Such revoked license shall immediately be surrendered to the prosecuting officer who shall forward the same to the registrar. The court shall report immediately any revocation, under this section, of a license or right to operate to the registrar and to the police department of the municipality in which the defendant is domiciled. Notwithstanding the provisions of section twenty-two, the web mining, revocation, reinstatement or issuance of a license or right to operate by importance of emotional, reason of a violation of paragraph (a) shall be controlled by web mining, the provisions of this section and sections twenty-four D and twenty-four E. (c) (1) Where the license or right to operate has been revoked under section twenty-four D or twenty-four E, or revoked under paragraph (b) and summarise theories of attachment, such person has not been convicted of a like offense or has not been assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction preceding the date of the commission of the web mining, offense for which he has been convicted, the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate to such person unless the prosecution of such person has been terminated in beggars opera favor of the web mining, defendant, until one year after the date of beggars opera conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the expiration of three months from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license for web mining employment or educational purposes, which license shall be effective for not more than an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the Essay about Evolution Gangster, present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control, and web mining, the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of six months from the date of beggars opera conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in web mining his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. (2) Where the theories of attachment, license or the right to web mining, operate of a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview, such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation preceding the date of the commission of the offense for which such person has been convicted, the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate of such person unless the prosecution of web mining such person has been terminated in capitalism favor of the defendant, until two years after the date of the conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the expiration of web mining 1 year from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for of emotional intelligence the purpose of web mining requesting the summarise theories, issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes, which license shall be effective for web mining not more than an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of summarise hardship and a showing by the person that the web mining, causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and multiple cause, that such person shall have successfully completed the web mining, residential treatment program in beggars opera subparagraph (4) of paragraph (a) of subdivision (1), or such treatment program mandated by section twenty-four D, and the registrar may, in web mining his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of 18 months from the date of importance intelligence conviction, apply for web mining and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of about of the requesting the issuance of a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and web mining, necessary. A mandatory restriction on a hardship license granted by the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an ignition interlock device installed on beggars opera each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the hardship license.

(3) Where the license or right to operate of any person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction two times preceding the date of the commission of the web mining, crime for beggars opera which he has been convicted or where the license or right to web mining, operate has been revoked pursuant to multiple disorder cause, section twenty-three due to a violation of said section due to a prior revocation under paragraph (b) or under section twenty-four D or twenty-four E, the registrar shall not restore the license or reinstate the right to operate to such person, unless the prosecution of such person has terminated in favor of the defendant, until eight years after the date of conviction; provided however, that such person may, after the expiration of two years from the date of the conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes, which license shall be effective for not more than an identical twelve hour period every day, on the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the web mining, present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and intelligence, the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of four years from the date of conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license on web mining a limited basis on beggars opera the grounds of hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in web mining his discretion, issue such a license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. A mandatory restriction on a hardship license granted by define social capitalism, the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an web mining ignition interlock device installed on each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the hardship license. (31/2) Where the license or the Evolution Gangster, right to operate of web mining a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation three times preceding the multiple, date of the commission of the web mining, offense for which such person has been convicted, the registrar shall not restore the beggars opera, license or reinstate the right to operate of such person unless the prosecution of such person has been terminated in favor of the defendant, until ten years after the date of the conviction; provided, however, that such person may, after the expiration of five years from the web mining, date of the conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of beggars opera requesting the issuance of a new license for employment or education purposes which license shall be effective for an identical twelve hour period every day on the grounds of web mining hardship and a showing by the person that the causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such license under such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary; and provided, further, that such person may, after the expiration of eight years from the date of beggars opera conviction, apply for and shall be granted a hearing before the registrar for the purpose of requesting the web mining, issuance of a new license on a limited basis on capitalism the grounds of hardship and web mining, a showing by the person that the social, causes of the present and past violations have been dealt with or brought under control and the registrar may, in his discretion, issue such a license under the terms and conditions as he deems appropriate and necessary. A mandatory restriction on a hardship license granted by web mining, the registrar under this subparagraph shall be that such person have an ignition interlock device installed on each vehicle owned, each vehicle leased and social, each vehicle operated by the licensee for the duration of the web mining, hardship license. (33/4) Where the license or the right to beggars opera, operate of web mining a person has been revoked under paragraph (b) and such person has been previously convicted of or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment or rehabilitation program by after Undergoing Interview, a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction because of a like violation four or more times preceding the date of the commission of the web mining, offense for beggars opera which such person has been convicted, such person’s license or right to operate a motor vehicle shall be revoked for web mining the life of such person, and such person shall not be granted a hearing before the social capitalism, registrar for web mining the purpose of requesting the issuance of a new license on a limited basis on the grounds of hardship; provided, however, that such license shall be restored or such right to operate shall be reinstated if the prosecution of such person has been terminated in favor of such person. An aggrieved party may appeal, in accordance with the provisions of chapter thirty A, from multiple personality any order of the web mining, registrar of motor vehicles under the provisions of this section. (4) In any prosecution commenced pursuant to this section, introduction into evidence of a prior conviction or a prior finding of sufficient facts by either certified attested copies of original court papers, or certified attested copies of the theories, defendant’s biographical and informational data from web mining records of the beggars opera, department of probation, any jail or house of corrections, the department of correction, or the registry, shall be prima facie evidence that the defendant before the court had been convicted previously or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program by a court of the commonwealth or any other jurisdiction. Such documentation shall be self-authenticating and admissible, after the web mining, commonwealth has established the defendant’s guilt on the primary offense, as evidence in any court of the summarise of attachment, commonwealth to prove the web mining, defendant’s commission of multiple disorder cause any prior convictions described therein.

The commonwealth shall not be required to introduce any additional corrobating evidence, nor live witness testimony to establish the validity of such prior convictions. (d) For the purposes of subdivision (1) of this section, a person shall be deemed to have been convicted if he pleaded guilty or nolo contendere or was found or adjudged guilty by web mining, a court of competent jurisdiction, whether or not he was placed on define probation without sentence or under a suspended sentence or the case was placed on web mining file, and a license may be revoked under paragraph (b) hereof notwithstanding the pendency of a prosecution upon appeal or otherwise after such a conviction. Where there has been more than one conviction in the same prosecution, the date of the first conviction shall be deemed to Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Employment Interview Essay, be the date of conviction under paragraph (c) hereof. (e) In any prosecution for a violation of paragraph (a), evidence of the percentage, by web mining, weight, of alcohol in the defendant’s blood at the time of the alleged offense, as shown by chemical test or analysis of his blood or as indicated by a chemical test or analysis of about and America his breath, shall be admissible and deemed relevant to the determination of the question of whether such defendant was at web mining, such time under the influence of intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that if such test or analysis was made by or at the direction of a police officer, it was made with the consent of the defendant, the intelligence, results thereof were made available to him upon his request and the defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity, at his request and at web mining, his expense, to have another such test or analysis made by a person or physician selected by him; and provided, further, that blood shall not be withdrawn from any party for the purpose of such test or analysis except by a physician, registered nurse or certified medical technician. Importance! Evidence that the defendant failed or refused to consent to such test or analysis shall not be admissible against him in a civil or criminal proceeding, but shall be admissible in any action by the registrar under paragraph (f) or in web mining any proceedings provided for in section twenty-four N. If such evidence is that such percentage was five one-hundredths or less, there shall be a permissible inference that such defendant was not under the Essay Evolution of the Gangster and America, influence of intoxicating liquor, and he shall be released from custody forthwith, but the web mining, officer who placed him under arrest shall not be liable for false arrest if such police officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle upon any such way or place while under the social capitalism, influence of web mining intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that in an instance where a defendant is under the age of twenty-one and such evidence is that the intelligence, percentage, by weight, of web mining alcohol in the defendant’s blood is two one-hundredths or greater, the officer who placed him under arrest shall, in accordance with subparagraph (2) of paragraph (f), suspend such defendant’s license or permit and take all other actions directed therein, if such evidence is that such percentage was more than five one-hundredths but less than eight one-hundredths there shall be no permissible inference. Summarise Of Attachment! A certificate, signed and sworn to, by a chemist of the web mining, department of the state police or by summarise, a chemist of a laboratory certified by the department of public health, which contains the web mining, results of an of attachment analysis made by such chemist of the percentage of alcohol in such blood shall be prima facie evidence of the percentage of web mining alcohol in social such blood. (f) (1) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to which the public has right to access, or upon any way or in any place to which the public has access as invitees or licensees, shall be deemed to have consented to web mining, submit to a chemical test or analysis of his breath or blood in the event that he is arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of beggars opera intoxicating liquor; provided, however, that no such person shall be deemed to have consented to web mining, a blood test unless such person has been brought for treatment to a medical facility licensed under the provisions of section 51 of chapter 111; and provided, further, that no person who is afflicted with hemophilia, diabetes or any other condition requiring the use of anticoagulants shall be deemed to have consented to a withdrawal of blood. Of Emotional! Such test shall be administered at web mining, the direction of a police officer, as defined in section 1 of chapter 90C, having reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested has been operating a motor vehicle upon such way or place while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. If the person arrested refuses to intelligence, submit to such test or analysis, after having been informed that his license or permit to operate motor vehicles or right to web mining, operate motor vehicles in summarise theories the commonwealth shall be suspended for a period of at least 180 days and up to a lifetime loss, for such refusal, no such test or analysis shall be made and he shall have his license or right to operate suspended in accordance with this paragraph for a period of 180 days; provided, however, that any person who is web mining under the age of 21 years or who has been previously convicted of a violation under this section, subsection (a) of section 24G, operating a motor vehicle with a percentage by weight of blood alcohol of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of subsection (b) of said section 24G, section 24L or subsection (a) of section 8 of Essay about of the and America chapter 90B, section 8A or 8B of said chapter 90B, or section 131/2 of chapter 265 or a like violation by a court of web mining any other jurisdiction shall have his license or right to operate suspended forthwith for a period of 3 years for such refusal; provided, further, that any person previously convicted of 2 such violations shall have his license or right to operate suspended forthwith for a period of after Interview 5 years for web mining such refusal; and provided, further, that a person previously convicted of 3 or more such violations shall have his license or right to operate suspended forthwith for life based upon such refusal. If a person refuses to define social capitalism, submit to any such test or analysis after having been convicted of a violation of web mining section 24L, the restistrar shall suspend his license or right to operate for 10 years.

If a person refuses to submit to any such test or analysis after having been convicted of a violation of subsection (a) of section 24G, operating a motor vehicle with a percentage by weight of blood alcohol of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of subsection (b) of said section 24G, or section 131/2 of chapter 265, the registrar shall revoke his license or right to operate for life. If a person refuses to take a test under this paragraph, the police officer shall: (i) immediately, on behalf of the Evolution and America, registrar, take custody of such person’s license or right to operate issued by the commonwealth; (ii) provide to each person who refuses such test, on behalf of the registrar, a written notification of suspension in web mining a format approved by the registrar; and. (iii) impound the vehicle being driven by the operator and importance, arrange for the vehicle to be impounded for a period of 12 hours after the operator’s refusal, with the costs for the towing, storage and web mining, maintenance of the vehicle to be borne by social capitalism, the operator. The police officer before whom such refusal was made shall, within 24 hours, prepare a report of such refusal. Each report shall be made in a format approved by the registrar and shall be made under the penalties of perjury by the police officer before whom such refusal was made. Each report shall set forth the web mining, grounds for the officer’s belief that the person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle on a way or place while under the beggars opera, influence of intoxicating liquor, and shall state that such person had refused to web mining, submit to beggars opera, a chemical test or analysis when requested by web mining, the officer to do so, such refusal having been witnessed by another person other than the defendant. Each report shall identify the police officer who requested the theories, chemical test or analysis and the other person witnessing the refusal. Each report shall be sent forthwith to web mining, the registrar along with a copy of the notice of intent to suspend in a form, including electronic or otherwise, that the Evolution of the Gangster and America, registrar deems appropriate. A license or right to operate which has been confiscated pursuant to this subparagraph shall be forwarded to the registrar forthwith.

The report shall constitute prima facie evidence of the web mining, facts set forth therein at any administrative hearing regarding the suspension specified in this section. The suspension of a license or right to operate shall become effective immediately upon Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing receipt of the notification of suspension from the police officer. A suspension for a refusal of either a chemical test or analysis of breath or blood shall run consecutively and not concurrently, both as to any additional suspension periods arising from the same incident, and as to each other. No license or right to operate shall be restored under any circumstances and no restricted or hardship permits shall be issued during the suspension period imposed by this paragraph; provided, however, that the defendant may immediately, upon the entry of a not guilty finding or dismissal of all charges under this section, section 24G, section 24L, or section 131/2 of chapter 265, and in the absence of any other alcohol related charges pending against said defendant, apply for and be immediately granted a hearing before the web mining, court which took final action on the charges for the purpose of beggars opera requesting the restoration of said license. At said hearing, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that said license be restored, unless the commonwealth shall establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that restoration of said license would likely endanger the public safety. In all such instances, the court shall issue written findings of web mining fact with its decision. (2) If a person’s blood alcohol percentage is not less than eight one-hundredths or the person is under twenty-one years of age and his blood alcohol percentage is not less than two one-hundredths, such police officer shall do the of attachment, following: (i) immediately and on behalf of the registrar take custody of such person’s drivers license or permit issued by web mining, the commonwealth; (ii) provide to each person who refuses the test, on behalf of the registrar, a written notification of suspension, in a format approved by the registrar; and. (iii) immediately report action taken under this paragraph to the registrar. Social! Each report shall be made in a format approved by the registrar and shall be made under the penalties of perjury by the police officer.

Each report shall set forth the web mining, grounds for Applicant’s Undergoing Employment Interview Essay the officer’s belief that the person arrested has been operating a motor vehicle on web mining any way or place while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and that the person’s blood alcohol percentage was not less than .08 or that the person was under 21 years of age at the time of the arrest and whose blood alcohol percentage was not less than .02. The report shall indicate that the person was administered a test or analysis, that the operator administering the test or analysis was trained and certified in the administration of the test or analysis, that the test was performed in Essay and America accordance with the regulations and standards promulgated by the secretary of public safety, that the equipment used for the test was regularly serviced and maintained and that the web mining, person administering the Essay Evolution and America, test had every reason to believe the equipment was functioning properly at the time the test was administered. Each report shall be sent forthwith to the registrar along with a copy of the notice of web mining intent to summarise theories, suspend, in web mining a form, including electronic or otherwise, that the registrar deems appropriate. A license or right to operate confiscated under this clause shall be forwarded to the registrar forthwith. The license suspension shall become effective immediately upon receipt by the offender of the notice of intent to suspend from a police officer. The license to operate a motor vehicle shall remain suspended until the disposition of the offense for about of the Gangster and America which the person is being prosecuted, but in no event shall such suspension pursuant to this subparagraph exceed 30 days. In any instance where a defendant is under the web mining, age of twenty-one years and such evidence is that the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in disorder the defendant’s blood is two one-hundredths or greater and upon the failure of any police officer pursuant to this subparagraph, to suspend or take custody of the driver’s license or permit issued by the commonwealth, and, in the absence of a complaint alleging a violation of web mining paragraph (a) of subdivision (1) or a violation of section twenty-four G or twenty-four L, the registrar shall administratively suspend the defendant’s license or right to operate a motor vehicle upon receipt of personality disorder a report from the police officer who administered such chemical test or analysis of the defendant’s blood pursuant to subparagraph (1). Each such report shall be made on a form approved by the registrar and web mining, shall be sworn to under the penalties of perjury by such police officer. Each such report shall set forth the grounds for Evolution of the the officer’s belief that the person arrested had been operating a motor vehicle on a way or place while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and that such person was under twenty-one years of age at the time of the web mining, arrest and whose blood alcohol percentage was two one-hundredths or greater. Such report shall also state that the person was administered such a test or analysis, that the operator administering the test or analysis was trained and certified in the administration of such test, that the test was performed in Self-Perception Interview accordance with the regulations and standards promulgated by the secretary of public safety, that the equipment used for such test was regularly serviced and maintained, and that the person administering the web mining, test had every reason to believe that the equipment was functioning properly at the time the Undergoing Employment Essay, test was administered. Each such report shall be endorsed by the police chief as defined in section one of chapter ninety C, or by the person authorized by him, and shall be sent to the registrar along with the confiscated license or permit not later than ten days from the date that such chemical test or analysis of the defendant’s blood was administered.

The license to operate a motor vehicle shall thereupon be suspended in accordance with section twenty-four P. (g) Any person whose license, permit or right to operate has been suspended under subparagraph (1) of web mining paragraph (f) shall, within fifteen days of suspension, be entitled to a hearing before the registrar which shall be limited to the following issues: (i) did the police officer have reasonable grounds to believe that such person had been operating a motor vehicle while under the personality, influence of intoxicating liquor upon web mining any way or in any place to which members of the public have a right of access or upon any way to which members of the public have a right of access as invitees or licensees, (ii) was such person placed under arrest, and (iii) did such person refuse to submit to such test or analysis. If, after such hearing, the registrar finds on any one of the said issues in multiple disorder the negative, the web mining, registrar shall forthwith reinstate such license, permit or right to operate. The registrar shall create and about Evolution Gangster and America, preserve a record at said hearing for judicial review. Within thirty days of the web mining, issuance of the final determination by the registrar following a hearing under this paragraph, a person aggrieved by the determination shall have the right to file a petition in multiple personality the district court for the judicial district in which the offense occurred for web mining judicial review. The filing of Self-Perception Undergoing Interview Essay a petition for judicial review shall not stay the revocation or suspension. The filing of a petition for judicial review shall be had as soon as possible following the submission of said request, but not later than thirty days following the web mining, submission thereof.

Review by the court shall be on Undergoing Employment Essay the record established at the hearing before the registrar. If the court finds that the department exceeded its constitutional or statutory authority, made an erroneous interpretation of the law, acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, or made a determination which is web mining unsupported by the evidence in the record, the court may reverse the social capitalism, registrar’s determination. [ Second paragraph of paragraph (g) of subdivision (1) effective until November 4, 2010. For text effective November 4, 2010, see below.] Any person whose license or right to operate has been suspended pursuant to subparagraph (2) of paragraph (f) on the basis of chemical analysis of his breath may within ten days of web mining such suspension request a hearing and upon such request shall be entitled to a hearing before the court in which the underlying charges are pending or if the individual is under the age of twenty-one and there are no pending charges, in the district court having jurisdiction where the arrest occurred, which hearing shall be limited to Applicant’s Employment, the following issue; whether a blood test administered pursuant to web mining, paragraph (e) within a reasonable period of beggars opera time after such chemical analysis of his breath, shows that the percentage, by weight, of web mining alcohol in such person’s blood was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to of emotional, such person under the age of twenty-one was less than two one-hundredths. If the court finds that such a blood test shows that such percentage was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of twenty-one, that such percentage was less than two one-hundredths, the court shall restore such person’s license, permit or right to web mining, operate and shall direct the prosecuting officer to Self-Perception, forthwith notify the criminal history systems board and the registrar of such restoration. [ Second paragraph of paragraph (g) of subdivision (1) as amended by 2010, 256, Sec. 63 effective November 4, 2010. For text effective until November 4, 2010, see above.] Any person whose license or right to operate has been suspended pursuant to subparagraph (2) of paragraph (f) on the basis of chemical analysis of his breath may within ten days of such suspension request a hearing and upon such request shall be entitled to a hearing before the web mining, court in which the underlying charges are pending or if the importance of emotional, individual is under the age of web mining twenty-one and there are no pending charges, in the district court having jurisdiction where the arrest occurred, which hearing shall be limited to the following issue; whether a blood test administered pursuant to paragraph (e) within a reasonable period of time after such chemical analysis of his breath, shows that the percentage, by weight, of alcohol in such person’s blood was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of twenty-one was less than two one-hundredths.

If the court finds that such a blood test shows that such percentage was less than eight one-hundredths or, relative to such person under the age of twenty-one, that such percentage was less than two one-hundredths, the court shall restore such person’s license, permit or right to operate and shall direct the prosecuting officer to beggars opera, forthwith notify the department of criminal justice information services and the registrar of web mining such restoration. (h) Any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) that involves operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of marihuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in section one of chapter ninety-four C, or the vapors of glue, may, as part of the disposition in beggars opera the case, be ordered to participate in a driver education program or a drug treatment or drug rehabilitation program, or any combination of said programs. The court shall set such financial and other terms for the participation of the defendant as it deems appropriate. [ First paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision (2) effective until September 30, 2010. For text effective September 30, 2010, see below.] (2) (a) Whoever upon any way or in any place to web mining, which the public has a right of access, or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle recklessly, or operates such a vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, or upon a bet or wager or in a race, or whoever operates a motor vehicle for the purpose of making a record and thereby violates any provision of section seventeen or any regulation under section eighteen, or whoever without stopping and Self-Perception Undergoing Interview, making known his name, residence and the register number of his motor vehicle goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any other vehicle or property, or whoever loans or knowingly permits his license or learner’s permit to operate motor vehicles to web mining, be used by social capitalism, any person, or whoever makes false statements in web mining an application for such a license or learner’s permit, or whoever knowingly makes any false statement in an application for registration of a motor vehicle, shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than two weeks nor more than two years, or both; and importance intelligence, whoever uses a motor vehicle without authority knowing that such use is unauthorized shall, for the first offense be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than two years, or both, and for a second offense by web mining, imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or in a house of correction for not less than thirty days nor more than two and one half years, or by after Employment Interview Essay, a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both such fine and web mining, imprisonment; and whoever is found guilty of a third or subsequent offense of such use without authority committed within five years of the earliest of his two most recent prior offenses shall be punished by a fine of social not less than two hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two and web mining, one half years in of attachment a house of correction or for not less than two and one half years nor more than five years in the state prison or by both fine and imprisonment. A summons may be issued instead of a warrant for arrest upon a complaint for a violation of web mining any provision of this paragraph if in the judgment of the court or justice receiving the complaint there is reason to believe that the defendant will appear upon a summons.

[ First paragraph of paragraph (a) of of emotional intelligence subdivision (2) as amended by 2010, 155, Sec. 11 effective September 30 2010. For text effective until September 30, 2010, see above.] (2) (a) Whoever upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle recklessly, or operates such a vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, or upon a bet or wager or in a race, or whoever operates a motor vehicle for the purpose of making a record and thereby violates any provision of section seventeen or any regulation under section eighteen, or whoever without stopping and making known his name, residence and the register number of web mining his motor vehicle goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any other vehicle or property, or whoever loans or knowingly permits his license or learner’s permit to operate motor vehicles to be used by any person, or whoever makes false statements in an application for such a license or learner’s permit, or whoever knowingly makes any false statement in an application for registration of a motor vehicle or whoever while operating a motor vehicle in violation of section 8M, 12A or 13B, such violation proved beyond a reasonable doubt, is the proximate cause of injury to importance, any other person, vehicle or property by operating said motor vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, shall be punished by web mining, a fine of not less than twenty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for define not less than two weeks nor more than two years, or both; and whoever uses a motor vehicle without authority knowing that such use is web mining unauthorized shall, for the first offense be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not less than thirty days nor more than two years, or both, and for a second offense by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or in a house of Self-Perception after Undergoing Essay correction for not less than thirty days nor more than two and one half years, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment; and whoever is found guilty of a third or subsequent offense of such use without authority committed within five years of the earliest of web mining his two most recent prior offenses shall be punished by a fine of not less than two hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars or by importance intelligence, imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two and web mining, one half years in a house of correction or for not less than two and one half years nor more than five years in the state prison or by both fine and imprisonment. A summons may be issued instead of beggars opera a warrant for arrest upon a complaint for a violation of any provision of this paragraph if in web mining the judgment of the court or justice receiving the about Gangster, complaint there is reason to believe that the defendant will appear upon a summons. There shall be an assessment of $250 against a person who, by a court of the commonwealth, is convicted of, is placed on web mining probation for or is granted a continuance without a finding for or otherwise pleads guilty to personality disorder cause, or admits to a finding of sufficient facts of operating a motor vehicle negligently so that the web mining, lives or safety of the public might be endangered under this section, but $150 of the $250 collected under this assessment shall be deposited monthly by the court with the state treasurer, who shall deposit it in the Head Injury Treatment Services Trust Fund, and the remaining amount of the theories, assessment shall be credited to the General Fund. The assessment shall not be subject to reduction or waiver by the court for any reason.

(a1/2) (1) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to which the web mining, public has right of Essay of the and America access, or upon web mining any way or in cause any place to which members of the public shall have access as invitees or licensees, and without stopping and web mining, making known his name, residence and the registration number of his motor vehicle, goes away after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any person not resulting in the death of any person, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than two years and by define social capitalism, a fine of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars. (2) Whoever operates a motor vehicle upon any way or in any place to web mining, which the public has a right of access or upon beggars opera any way or in any place to which members of the public shall have access as invitees or licensees and without stopping and making known his name, residence and web mining, the registration number of Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview Essay his motor vehicle, goes away to avoid prosecution or evade apprehension after knowingly colliding with or otherwise causing injury to any person shall, if the injuries result in the death of a person, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than ten years and by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars or by imprisonment in a jail or house of web mining correction for not less than one year nor more than two and one-half years and by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars. Multiple Disorder! The sentence imposed upon such person shall not be reduced to less than one year, nor suspended, nor shall any person convicted under this paragraph be eligible for probation, parole, or furlough or receive any deduction from his sentence until such person has served at least one year of such sentence; provided, however, that the commissioner of correction may on the recommendation of the web mining, warden, superintendent or other person in beggars opera charge of web mining a correctional institution, or the administrator of a county correctional institution, grant to an offender committed under this paragraph, a temporary release in the custody of an personality disorder officer of such institution for the following purposes only: to web mining, attend the funeral of a relative; to visit a critically ill relative; to obtain emergency medical or psychiatric services unavailable at said institution or to engage in employment pursuant to Essay Evolution, a work release program. (3) Prosecutions commenced under subparagraph (1) or (2) shall not be continued without a finding nor placed on file. (b) A conviction of a violation of paragraph (a) or paragraph (a1/2) of subdivision (2) of this section shall be reported forthwith by the court or magistrate to the registrar, who may in any event, and shall unless the court or magistrate recommends otherwise, revoke immediately the license or right to operate of the person so convicted, and no appeal, motion for new trial or exceptions shall operate to stay the revocation of the license or right to operate. Web Mining! If it appears by the records of the registrar that the person so convicted is the owner of multiple disorder a motor vehicle or has exclusive control of any motor vehicle as a manufacturer or dealer or otherwise, the web mining, registrar may revoke the certificate of registration of any or all motor vehicles so owned or exclusively controlled. (c) The registrar, after having revoked the license or right to operate of any person under paragraph (b), in his discretion may issue a new license or reinstate the social capitalism, right to operate to him, if the prosecution has terminated in favor of the defendant. In addition, the registrar may, after an web mining investigation or upon hearing, issue a new license or reinstate the right to operate to a person convicted in of emotional intelligence any court for a violation of any provision of paragraph (a) or (a1/2) of web mining subdivision (2); provided, however, that no new license or right to operate shall be issued by the registrar to: (i) any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a1/2) until one year after the date of Essay about Evolution of the revocation following his conviction if for a first offense, or until two years after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction; (ii) any person convicted of a violation of subparagraph (2) of paragraph (a1/2) until three years after the web mining, date of revocation following his conviction if for a first offense or until ten years after the date of personality cause revocation following any subsequent conviction; (iii) any person convicted, under paragraph (a) of using a motor vehicle knowing that such use is web mining unauthorized, until one year after the Essay about Evolution of the, date of revocation following his conviction if for a first offense or until three years after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction; and (iv) any person convicted of any other provision of paragraph (a) until sixty days after the date of his original conviction if for web mining a first offense or one year after the date of revocation following any subsequent conviction within a period of summarise theories three years.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, a person holding a junior operator’s license who is convicted of operating a motor vehicle recklessly or negligently under paragraph (a) shall not be eligible for license reinstatement until 180 days after the web mining, date of his original conviction for a first offense or 1 year after the beggars opera, date of revocation following a subsequent conviction within a period of web mining 3 years. The registrar, after investigation, may at Essay Evolution, any time rescind the revocation of a license or right to operate revoked because of web mining a conviction of operating a motor vehicle upon any way or in summarise theories any place to which the public has a right of access or any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply in the same manner to juveniles adjudicated under the provisions of section fifty-eight B of chapter one hundred and web mining, nineteen. (3) The prosecution of any person for the violation of beggars opera any provision of this section, if a subsequent offence, shall not, unless the interests of justice require such disposition, be placed on file or otherwise disposed of web mining except by trial, judgment and sentence according to the regular course of criminal proceedings; and define social capitalism, such a prosecution shall be otherwise disposed of only on motion in writing stating specifically the reasons therefor and verified by affidavits if facts are relied upon. If the court or magistrate certifies in writing that he is satisfied that the web mining, reasons relied upon theories are sufficient and web mining, that the interests of justice require the Applicant’s after, allowance of the motion, the motion shall be allowed and the certificate shall be filed in the case. Web Mining! A copy of the motion and certificate shall be sent by of attachment, the court or magistrate forthwith to the registrar. (4) In any prosecution commenced pursuant to this section, introduction into evidence of a prior conviction or prior finding of web mining sufficient facts by either original court papers or certified attested copy of original court papers, accompanied by a certified attested copy of the importance, biographical and informational data from official probation office records, shall be prima facie evidence that a defendant has been convicted previously or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program because of a like offense by a court of the commonwealth one or more times preceding the date of commission of the offense for which said defendant is being prosecuted.

A Massachusetts DUI OUI jury returned verdicts of guilty on web mining charges of felony motor vehicle homicide, operating under the influence, and operating to endanger. Superior Court of define capitalism Massachusetts. October 16, 2003. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER MASS. R. CRIM. P 25(b)(2) On August 1, 2003, after a two week trial, a jury returned verdicts of guilty on charges of felony motor vehicle homicide, operating under the influence, and operating to endanger.

Before me is the defendant’s motion, under Mass. R. Crim. P. 25(b)(2), for (a) a required finding of not guilty, or (b) a reduction to the lesser included offense of misdemeanor vehicular homicide on ground of operating to endanger. For the web mining, reasons that follow, the defendant’s motion is DENIED. At about 1:00 p.m. on September 1, 2001 thirteen-year-old Evan Holofcener was riding his bicycle on or beside Farmers Row (Route 111), Groton, when he was struck head-on by a pickup truck traveling in the opposite direction. The truck was driven by intelligence, the defendant, who was then on web mining her way from her home in Ayer, via Route 111, to Groton center. Evan died of his injuries later that afternoon. The defendant was subsequently charged with operating under the define, influence, operating to endanger, and felony motor vehicle homicide.1. It was the Commonwealth’s theory of the case that the defendant, who had been prescribed a number of medications including diazepam (Valium), lorazepam (Ativan), and web mining, oxycodone (Percocet), was under the influence of at least one, and that her truck veered out of her lane of travel and onto the sidewalk where Evan was traveling. The jury evidently agreed, and convicted the defendant of each of the importance, charges against web mining, her.

The verdict of intelligence felony motor vehicle homicide (G.L. c. 90, §24G) required findings by the jury both that the defendant operated her vehicle negligently or recklessly so that the lives or safety of the public might have been endangered, and that she was under the influence of an intoxicating substance (on the Commonwealth’s theory, a scheduled narcotic or depressant). See Note 1, supra. The evidence as to each of these findings is therefore reviewed in turn. A. Evidence of Operating to Endanger. No third party witnessed the accident. Web Mining! Evidence as to negligent or reckless operation therefore consisted principally of the expert testimony of two accident reconstructionists, Trooper Kerry Alvino of the Massachusetts State Police, called by the Commonwealth, and Wilson G. Dobson, P.E., called by the defendant.

No lengthy review of either expert’s testimony is necessary here, except to say that Trooper Alvino opined, based on the physical evidence which she reviewed the afternoon of the crash and on methods and formulae commonly used in accident reconstruction, that the point of impact was well onto the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the defendant’s lane of travel, and that the truck therefore must have left the roadway and traveled on the sidewalk.2 Mr. Dobson opined that the physical evidence was insufficient to determine, with a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, the location of the impact. Beggars Opera! The Commonwealth’s evidence, while it may not have compelled a finding of negligence, certainly warranted it. The jury’s verdict on this point was adequately supported by web mining, the evidence. B. Intelligence! Operating Under the Influence. The “operating under” element of the OUI (G.L. c. 90, §24) and vehicular homicide (c.90, §24G) statutes require, for web mining a conviction, that the defendant have been operating her motor vehicle “while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or of marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in [G.L. Beggars Opera! c. Web Mining! 94C, §1], or the vapors of glue.” As noted above, the Commonwealth contended that the defendant was under the influence of theories one or more of web mining three prescription medications: diazepam (sold under the importance of emotional, brand name Valium), lorazepam (Ativan), or oxycodone (Percocet) (referred to herein collectively as the web mining, “scheduled medications”).

The first two are depressants; the last, a narcotic.3. There was no direct evidence as to when the defendant had last taken any of the scheduled medications; nor was there medical evidence (e.g., blood or urine tests) as to Self-Perception after Employment, whether any were in her system, or in what quantity. The circumstantial evidence as to the “operating under” element was as follows. 1. CVS Pharmacy records. CVS Pharmacy records for the period May 26, 2001 and September 27, 2001 showed that the defendant had filled prescriptions for the scheduled medications on the following dates: Date Dosage Quantity. Date Dosage Quantity. OXYCODONE with APAP.

Date Dosage Quantity. The CVS records also showed prescriptions for the following medications, among others: Date Dosage Quantity. 8/17/01 100 mg. 15. Date Dosage Quantity. Date Dosage Quantity. Although there was evidence (see below) that the latter three medications may affect driving ability, none is web mining a controlled substance, or otherwise falls within the Self-Perception after Interview Essay, OUI and vehicular homicide statutes.

Even if the defendant were impaired by one or more of these medications, therefore, she would not have been “operating under the influence” within the web mining, meaning of of emotional intelligence these statutes, unless she was also impaired by web mining, one or more of the scheduled medications. 2. Testimony of Dr. Abela. The CVS records further showed that the oxycodone prescription which the Essay Evolution Gangster and America, defendant filled on August 29 was written by Dr. Andrew Abela. Dr. Abela, a dentist, testified that on August 24, 2001, while the web mining, defendant was a psychiatric inpatient at Emerson Hospital, she made an emergency visit to his office for tooth pain. He extracted a lower molar, and gave her the personality disorder, oxycodone prescription at that time.

His practice is to web mining, recommend to patients that if they experience pain, they should first try ice, then Motrin, then Vicodin or Percocet (both narcotic analgesics)4; that they should use the minimum narcotic needed to social capitalism, control pain; and that they should not drive if they have taken a narcotic because it can cause drowsiness. He further testified that patients who have had a tooth extracted sometimes experience “dry socket” three to five days after the procedure, which can cause pain to flare up at web mining, that time. Extraction of a lower tooth, and smoking following the procedure (the defendant is a smoker), both place the beggars opera, patient at increased risk for web mining dry socket. 3. Package Warnings. The CVS records included copies of the “monographs” that CVS, when filling a prescription, produces and staples to the bag containing the pill bottle. Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Essay! The monograph sets forth patient information in paragraphs headed “USES,” HOW TO USE,” SIDE EFFECTS,” PRECAUTIONS,” DRUG INTERACTIONS,” OVERDOSE,” NOTES,” MISSED DOSE,” and “STORAGE.” Each monograph is lengthy (about half of an 8? ? 11 page of fairly small type). The following are excerpts from the monographs for the scheduled medications: (distributed with diazepam)

SIDE EFFECTS: This medication causes drowsiness and dizziness. Web Mining! Avoid tasks requiring alertness. Other side effects may include: stomach upset, blurred vision, headache, confusion, depression, impaired coordination, change in heart rate, trembling, weakness, memory loss, hangover effect (grogginess), dreaming or nightmares. … SIDE EFFECTS: This drug can cause drowsiness, dizziness, lack of coordination, grogginess, headache, nausea, dry mouth, blurred vision. If these effects continue or become severe, contact your doctor. Notify your doctor if you experience any of these effects while using this drug: confusion, hallucinations, depression, yellowing of the eyes or skin, slow pulse, trouble breathing, fever/chills, prolonged sore throat, unusual tiredness, unusual bleeding or bruising. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist. PRECAUTIONS: … Use caution when performing tasks requiring alertness. … SIDE EFFECTS: This medication may cause constipation, stomach upset, lightheadedness, dizziness, drowsiness, nausea, or flushing. If any of these effects persist or worsen, contact your doctor or pharmacist promptly. Tell your doctor immediately if you have any of these unlikely but serious side effects: loss of coordination, confusion, irregular heartbeat, slow/irregular breathing, anxiety, tremors. ….

PRECAUTIONS: … Use caution when performing tasks requiring alertness such as driving or using heavy machinery. 4. Essay About Evolution Of The! Evidence as to Therapeutic and Side Effects. As outlined below, with the exception of web mining oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication), the other scheduled and the three unscheduled medications are all prescribed in the management of define capitalism various psychiatric conditions and/or insomnia. In recorded statements she gave to the police on September 2 and web mining, 6, 2001 (both of which were played for Essay Evolution and America the jury), the defendant stated that she had undergone a miscarriage on web mining May 19 of that year; suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder; and had twice attempted suicide (most recently on of emotional intelligence August 21, which had resulted in her admission to Emerson Hospital’s psychiatric unit from then until the 29th). She also stated that she had been having trouble sleeping, and that the night before the accident, she had gone to bed about 4:00 a.m., rising about web mining 9:00 a.m. The Commonwealth’s medical expert (Dr.

Brower) testified concerning the indications, action, and side effects of the medications the defendant had been prescribed. Of the scheduled medications: 1. Oxycodone (Percocet) is a narcotic analgesic, derived from the opium plant and used for summarise of attachment moderate to severe pain. Web Mining! Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include sedation (sleepiness or drowsiness); nausea, stomach upset, and vomiting; impaired attentiveness, alertness, and vigilance; difficulty coordinating eye movements; and light-headedness. • Diazepam (Valium) is an a benzodiazepine prescribed for anxiety and sometimes for define social insomnia. Web Mining! It metabolizes, and affects the brain, quickly after ingestion (peak effect occurring in an hour), but because its metabolites have similar effects and accumulate with repeated dosing, chronic use can produce longer-lasting effects after each dose. Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include: impairment of cognitive and motor functions, especially fine motor coordination; confusion and problems with thinking; drowsiness and lassitude; dizziness, lightheadedness, and poor coordination. • Lorazepam (Ativan) is another benzodiazepine with indications and effects similar to diazepam, but slower-acting and with longer-lasting effects. Side effects, which can occur in therapeutic doses, include impairment and multiple disorder cause, slowing down of web mining mental and motor functions, and drowsiness.

A single dose can affect the patient for up to Applicant’s Self-Perception after Interview Essay, 24 hours. Two milligrams is the web mining, maximum dose normally prescribed, and beggars opera, is a sedating dose. Of the non-scheduled drugs that the web mining, plaintiff was also prescribed: • Topomax is an anti-seizure medication sometimes prescribed “off label” to control mood disorders. Beggars Opera! Side effects can include somnolence, fatigue, and blunted mental reactions. • Effexor is an antidepressant, also used in generalized anziety disorder. Side effects can include nausea, dizziness, and insomnia or somnolence, but not impairment of web mining psychomotor skills. • Zyprexa is summarise theories of attachment used to treat severe insomnia. Side effects can include drowsiness, tremor, stiffness and web mining, abnormal body movements. Generally speaking, the three scheduled medications produce quick relief of acute symptoms.

Both therapeutic and side effects may decrease with prolonged, regular use, but this is less likely with prolonged “PRN” (as needed) use. The other three medications take longer — 2 to 4 weeks — to be effective, and their side effects normally abate over time. Dr. Brower opined, in response to hypothetical questions which assumed the Commonwealth’s view of how the accident happened (i.e., that the truck left the roadway for the sidewalk), that such things as difficulty keeping a vehicle on a straight course, delayed reaction time, and reacting to an emergency erratically or at the last minute, are consistent with the effects of the beggars opera, three scheduled drugs. There could be other causes as well (and patients vary in the severity of their reactions to these and other drugs), but any or all of the scheduled drugs are capable of web mining producing these effects. Topomax, Zyprexa, and (especially) Effoxor, however, are less potent, and much less consistently associated with these kinds of impairments, than are the scheduled drugs. 5. Defendant’s Statements Concerning Medications.

The plaintiff made various statements, shortly after the accident, concerning the medications she was taking. In chronological order: 1. Multiple Personality! Ricardo Alcantara, who happened on web mining the scene just after the summarise of attachment, accident and helped the plaintiff out of her truck, testified that the defendant told him she was on multiple medications; that she opened her purse and showed him “quite a few bottles”; and web mining, that he overheard her tell an EMT who responded that she was on Applicant’s Undergoing Interview Essay six medications. 2. Adam Blumenthal, who appears to have been the EMT to whom Alcantara referred, testified (with the aid of his report) that the defendant told him she was on Effexor, Topamax, Ativan, and Zyprexa. 3. Arthur Ragusa was a nurse at the Deaconess Nashoba Hospital (now the Nashoba Valley Medical Center). Web Mining! His record notes, among the Evolution of the, defendant’s “current medications,” percocet and valium “PRN” (i.e., as needed). This was in response to the question he asks every patient,” What medications are you currently taking?” 4. In her September 2, 2001 and September 6, 2001 recorded statements to the Groton Police, the web mining, defendant said she had taken her medications the morning of the accident. She stated that she had not driven, or been out of the house, for two weeks prior to of emotional, the accident (excepting her stay on a locked floor at Emerson Hospital). She listed, and web mining, displayed bottles of, Topamax, Zyprexa, Effexor, Nestabs (a vitamin), and iron. She stated that she takes these as prescribed — Effexor twice a day, Zyprexa once a day, and Topomax (“I take two”) — and that “If I went without them, I’d be a fruit loop.”5 She took her Effexor shortly before leaving the house the day of the accident.

She said that the packaging for Topamax, Zyprexa, and Effexor advised caution when operating heavy machinery, but that she had felt OK to drive on September 1. Of Attachment! She never mentioned diazepam, lorazepam, or oxycodone in her statement to the police. 6. Descriptions of the Defendant’s Affect. Five witnesses testified as to web mining, the defendant’s affect, as it bore on the question of possible impairment from drugs. 1. Blumenthal testified that as far as he could tell, the defendant was not “grossly” affected by drugs or alcohol. 2. Melissa Heys, a nurse with the nearby Groton School, came on the scene very shortly after the accident, and went to see if the defendant needed help. She assessed her for head injury, and noted that she appeared alert, not drowsy, able to focus, oriented, unimpaired in speech, and intelligence, able to web mining, follow the beggars opera, directions of the EMTs. 3. Steven Mickle, with the Groton rescue squad and a first responder, testified that the defendant appeared alert, oriented, and able to follow instructions and to respond to his questions. 4. Web Mining! Dr. Balser, who saw the defendant at Deaconess Nashoba, noted her to be alert and define, oriented “times 3? (i.e., oriented to person, place and time).

His bedside neurological exam showed no focal deficits and no signs of intoxication; “There was nothing about her that made me think she was under the influence.” He therefore saw no indication for performing a toxicology screen (but would not have performed one even if he had; since she had already admitted to web mining, taking Ativan and Percocet, the presence of summarise of attachment these substances in a blood or urine sample would have been uninformative).6. 5. On the other hand, Officer Hatch, a Groton Police officer (since retired) who was among the first responders, testified that he saw the defendant at the scene; that he has known her since she was a little girl; and that in his opinion, she was under the influence of something. He smelled no alcohol and there was” nothing I could put my finger on,” but he did notice that she was unusually subdued, not “bubbly” as she normally was.7 He also testified that the defendant told him at the scene that she had swerved into the other lane (leftwards) to avoid the bicyclist. He went to the hospital where she was taken, where she said she had swerved to the right to avoid cars in the oncoming lane. Hatch asker her if she remembered telling him she had swerved to the left; she said she did not. 7. Web Mining! Erratic Driving. There was also the evidence of the defendant’s erratic driving the day of the accident. As mentioned above, there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the accident occurred when defendant’s vehicle left her lane of travel and swerved onto the sidewalk, into the path of the oncoming bicyclist, for Essay and America no apparent reason: the pavement was dry; the weather was clear; she was heading north and not into web mining the sun; the road took a gradual curve to the left where the defendant drove off it to personality disorder, the right; and the jury could have discredited her statements both that she swerved right to avoid cars and that she swerved left to avoid the web mining, bicyclist.

There was also testimony from two witnesses who, the jury could have found, encountered the about Evolution and America, plaintiff minutes before the accident, between a mile and two away. The defendant was coming from her home in Ayer, northbound on Route 111 (known as Groton School Road in Ayer and Farmers Row in Groton), to Groton Center (with a brief stop to drop off a video at web mining, a friend’s house on the way). George Krusen and Barry Curcio, who were driving together south on Route 111 in Ayer, encountered a truck coming toward them, driven by a woman at a high rate of beggars opera speed in the opposite (northbound) lane. As they and the truck approached one another at a curve in the road, the truck swerved into web mining their lane and of emotional intelligence, beyond, into the dirt by the (wrong) side of the road. Web Mining! It did not slow down, and was in their lane for several seconds before veering back into the correct lane of travel. Krusen, who was driving, slowed down and avoided a collision by just a foot or two. In her September 6 statement to the police, the defendant stated that the only significant event on her drive from Ayer to summarise theories of attachment, Groton was that her sandal “fell off once” in the general area of the incident described by Krusen and web mining, Curcio; that she might have swerved slightly; but “then that was fine.” Both men generally described the truck and driver,8 and beggars opera, both, at web mining, the request of the Groton police, viewed the truck after the accident at the garage where it had been towed. Krusen (the driver) told the police he did not think the truck in personality disorder cause the garage was the web mining, one he had seen on Groton School Road. Curcio, on the hand, testified that he was positive that it was the Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview, same truck.

The time, place, and descriptions of the encounter were such that the jury would have been warranted in web mining concluding that the driver was the defendant, and that her near-miss with the Krusen-Curzio vehicle took place just before the accident with Evan Holofcener.9. A. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing Essay! Renewed Motion for Required Finding. The defendant moved for a directed finding at the close of the Commonwealth’s case. At that point, as required, I reviewed “whether the evidence presented up to the time of a motion for a directed verdict [was] legally sufficient to permit the submission of the web mining, case to the … jury, to decide the innocence or guilt of the beggars opera, accused.” Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676 (1979). I determined that although the evidence that the web mining, defendant was under the influence of any of the scheduled medications at the time of the accident was entirely circumstantial, there was enough to warrant submitting the case to the jury. The defendant has now renewed her motion, requiring me (a) to summarise, look again at whether the Commonwealth’s case was sufficient, and (b) “to determine whether the Commonwealth’s position as to web mining, proof had deteriorated since it had closed its case.” Commonwealth v. Basch, 386 Mass. 620, 622 n. 2 (1982). Both determinations require that I view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. Latimore, 378 Mass. at 677-78; Commonwealth v. Torres, 24 Mass. App.

Ct. 317, 323-24 (1987). “[T]he critical inquiry on review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction must be not simply to determine whether the jury was properly instructed on reasonable doubt, but to determine whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … [The] question is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Thus, to Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview Essay, sustain the denial of web mining a directed verdict, it is not enough … to find that there was some record evidence, however slight, to support each essential element of the summarise theories, offense; [there must have been] enough evidence that could have satisfied a rational trier of fact of each such element beyond a reasonable doubt. Latimore, 378 Mass. at 677-78, quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-319 (1979); see Torres and Commonwealth v. Doucette, 408 Mass. 454, 456 (1990) (both applying the Latimore / Jackson standard of appellate review to trial judge’s review of motion for directed finding). As noted above, in the discussion of the web mining, facts, Trooper Alvino’s testimony placed the defendant’s truck on the sidewalk, out of her lane of beggars opera travel and in web mining the path of an oncoming cyclist, with no apparent explanation to be found in road, traffic, weather, or lighting conditions. This was sufficient to convict for operating to social, endanger.

See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Siciliano, 420 Mass. 303, 307-08 (1995) (“evidence that the defendant drove while intoxicated, made a wide turn, crossed into the opposite traffic lane, swerved back and web mining, forth across the roadway, and nearly struck a traffic island” was sufficient); Commonwealth v. Bergeron, 398 Mass. 338, 340 (1986) (a finding of ordinary negligence suffices for the operating to endanger element of vehicular homicide); Commonwealth v. Vartanian, 251 Mass. 355, 358 (1925) (presence of social capitalism people is a relevant factor when considering whether defendant operated vehicle to endanger). Eyewitness evidence as to the operation of the truck before the web mining, accident was not required. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gordon, 389 Mass. 351, 358 (1983).

The evidence concerning operating under the influence presented a closer case, but still one presentable to the jury. Social! To succeed on this element, the Commonwealth was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more of the web mining, scheduled medications, through its effect on the defendant’s “judgment, alertness, and ability to respond promptly and effectively to unexpected emergencies,” diminished her “ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.”10 Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. 169, 174 (1985). Personality! A scheduled medication need not have been the sole or exclusive cause of the defendant’s diminished ability to drive safely, so long as is was a contributor. “It is web mining enough if the of emotional, defendant’s capacity to web mining, operate a motor vehicle is diminished because of [a substance listed in beggars opera the statute], even though other, concurrent causes contribute to that diminished capacity.” Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Stathopoulos, 401 Mass. Of Emotional! 453, 457 (1988). From the evidence summarized above, the jury could have concluded: 1. That the defendant had been prescribed, had purchased, and thus had access to the three controlled medications; 2. That her pattern of filling the prescriptions for diazepam and (more especially) lorazepam indicated regular consumption; 3. That the web mining, recency of her filling prescriptions for oxycodone (August 29, 2001) and lorazepam (August 31, 2001) — particularly when combined with the importance, indications that she may have suffered very recently from web mining dry socket (an indication for oxycodone) and, on the night of August 31, from insomnia (an indication for lorazepam) — indicated recent enough consumption to have affected her on beggars opera September 1;

4. That lorazepam, even if consumed the night before, would still have affected her the day of the accident; 5. That the web mining, steadily diminishing list of medications given by the plaintiff following the define, accident — and the omission of the three controlled medications in her statements to the police — indicated a consciousness of web mining guilt, further bolstering the other circumstantial evidence of multiple intoxication; 6. Web Mining! That the theories of attachment, evidence of the defendant’s erratic and dangerous driving, on two occasions11 separate but close in web mining time and location, and Applicant’s after Interview Essay, the lack of web mining any reasonable explanation for either, was evidence of impairment due to intoxication; 7. That the fact that the summarise theories, defendant was under the influence of prescription medications, rather than alcohol or a common drug of abuse, made it difficult for most of the witnesses who evaluated the defendant’s affect after the accident to detect impairment; 8. That the description of the defendant’s affect by Officer Hatch, who had known her for web mining most of her life, was consistent with the sedating effects of all three controlled medications; and. 9. That the plaintiff was adequately advised of the sedating and impairing effects of he controlled medications, such that her intoxication was voluntary (see Commonwealth v. Darch, 54 Mass. App. Define Social! Ct. Web Mining! 713 (2002) and Commonwealth v. Wallace, 14 Mass.

App. Ct. 358, 360 (1982)). As noted above, the case lacked direct evidence that the theories, defendant had taken any of the controlled medications recently enough to be impaired by them, and it lacked direct evidence of what concentrations she had of any of them. Web Mining! Even the direct evidence of signs of intoxication in beggars opera the defendant’s affect was thin, though perhaps explicably so (see ¶7 above). From the evidence that was presented, however, the jury had enough to conclude that the defendant had access to the drugs; that she had taken oxycodone recently and lorazepam both recently and regularly; that she appreciated the web mining, dangers of the controlled medications, both medically and (by the time she spoke to the police) legally as well; and that her erratic and dangerous driving on the day of the accident lacked any reasonable explanation other than impairment by one or both of these drugs.

This was enough to convict. The question of guilt cannot be left to conjecture or surmise. … However, circumstantial evidence is competent to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. An inference drawn from circumstantial evidence “need only be reasonable and summarise, possible; it need not be necessary or inescapable.” Moreover, the web mining, evidence and the permissible inferences therefrom need only be sufficient to persuade “minds of about of the Gangster and America ordinary intelligence and web mining, sagacity” of the defendant’s guilt. Beggars Opera! Fact finders are not “required to web mining, divorce themselves of beggars opera common sense, but rather should apply to facts which they find proven such reasonable inferences as are justified in the light of their experience as to the natural inclinations of human beings.” To the extent that conflicting inferences are possible from the evidence, it is for the fact finder to resolve the conflict. Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 423 Mass. 863, 868 (1996) (citations omitted). B. Motion to Reduce Verdict.

Rule 25(b)(2) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides as follows: Motion After Discharge of Jury. If the motion [for a required finding of not guilty] is denied and the case is submitted to the jury, the motion may be renewed within five days after the jury is discharged and may include in the alternative a motion for a new trial. If a verdict of guilty is returned, the judge may on motion set aside the verdict and order a new trial, or order the web mining, entry of a finding of not guilty, or order the entry of Applicant’s Self-Perception Essay a finding of guilty of any offense included in the offense charged in the indictment or complaint. The Rule incorporates the web mining, statutory authority conferred by multiple disorder, G.L. Web Mining! c. 278, §11. In a recent (and celebrated) discussion of this authority, the SJC noted, The authority of the trial judge under rule 25(b)(2) to reduce the verdict or grant a new trial in of the Gangster and America criminal cases is much like our authority to review so-called capital cases — convictions of murder in web mining the first degree — under G.L. c. 278, § 33E. The postconviction powers granted by the Legislature to define social, the courts at web mining, both trial and appellate levels reflect the disorder cause, evolution of web mining legislative policy promoting judicial responsibility to ensure that the result in every criminal case is consonant with justice. Essay Evolution Gangster And America! It is web mining clear that the responsibility may be exercised by Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview, the trial judge, even if the evidence warrants the jury’s verdict. Web Mining! “[A] new trial or verdict reduction may be proper even when the evidence can legally support the jury’s verdict.” The judge’s option to reduce a verdict offers a means to rectify a disproportionate verdict, among other reasons, short of granting a new trial. The judge’s power under rule 25(b)(2), like our power under G.L. c. 278, §33E, may be used to beggars opera, ameliorate injustice caused by the Commonwealth, defense counsel, the jury, the judge’s own error, or … the interaction of several causes. Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Woodward, 427 Mass.

659, 666-67 (1998). As the trial judge in Woodward put it, a judge’s exercise of the Rule’s authority to reduce a verdict is summarise less constrained than when considering a motion to set aside a verdict as unsupported by the evidence: The test here is no longer narrowly legal. The judge, formerly only an umpire enforcing the rules, now must determine whether, under the web mining, special circumstances of this case, justice requires lowering the level of guilt …. The facts, as well as the law, are open to consideration. Commonwealth v. Woodward, 1997 WL 694119 (Mass .Super.; Zobel, J.) This broad authority is nonetheless subject to multiple personality disorder, prudential limitations. The SJC added, to what has been quoted above from the Woodward opinion, that “[b]ecause such broad postconviction authority is vested in the trial judge, we have counseled that a judge should use this power sparingly, and web mining, trial judges have in fact used their rule 25(b)(2) power infrequently.” Id. at 667, citing Commonwealth v. Keough, 385 Mass. 314, 321 (1982) (trial judge “should not sit as a `second jury’”); see also Commonwealth v. Carter, 423 Mass. Summarise Theories! 506, 512 (1996) (judge hearing motion to web mining, reduce verdict “is not to play the role of thirteenth juror” or to “second guess the jury”). Perhaps not surprisingly, it appears that the verdict-reduction power is exercised most frequently — as in Woodward — to walk the “fine line[s]” between the forms of malice required for the various degrees of homicide.12 427 Mass. at 669.

The defendant offers two reasons for a reduction of the verdict in beggars opera this case, from felony to misdemeanor vehicular homicide (i.e., setting aside the finding as to operating under and leaving intact the finding as to operating to endanger): 1. The lack of web mining any direct evidence, or of overwhelmingly compelling circumstantial evidence, that the defendant ingested any of the controlled medications during a relevant time period; or that she exhibited signs of social intoxication on the day of the accident; or that her driving ability was actually impaired; and. 2. The lack of any evidence whatsoever that the defendant abused any of the controlled medications, or otherwise failed to take them as prescribed (which the web mining, defendant frames, in part, as an argument for beggars opera “involuntary intoxication”). The evidence as to web mining, ingestion, intoxication, and impairment is summarized above and need not be repeated here. It was, as the disorder cause, defendant characterizes it, “slim,” at web mining, least in the sense that there was no single piece of evidence of which one could say that if accepted as true, it virtually compelled a finding of intoxication by a controlled medication. That said, there was a good deal of personality disorder circumstantial evidence which, taken in web mining its entirety, is difficult to discount. Perhaps the strongest single piece of evidence came, not from medicine or from pharmacology, but from physics and define social capitalism, accident reconstruction. If one accepts the conclusion of web mining Trooper Alvino that the truck was on the sidewalk at the point of impact — which the jury were not required but were entitled to do — there might be a variety of explanations for it, but the only one to be found anywhere in the evidence is that of intoxication.

If one also accepts the testimony of Krusen and Self-Perception after Employment, Curcio (including the identification furnished by web mining, the latter) — as the jury were also entitled to do — this showed a chain of events of some duration, likewise consistent with intoxication and begging alternative explanation in the evidence. A loose sandal might explain the Krusen-Curcio incident alone — though even this is undercut by multiple personality disorder, the defendant’s disclaimer of any problem resulting from it — but it does little to explain a course of reckless driving, which endangered two lives and took a third, and which persisted or was repeated over the course of several minutes and several miles. When combined with evidence of the defendant’s access to, her apparent pattern of using, and the likely effects of the controlled medications, and with Officer Hatch’s description of her affect after the accident, the conclusion which the jury drew, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a reasoned and rational one. As noted above, the verdict-reduction power conferred by web mining, G.L. Social! c. 278, §11 and Rule 25(b)(2) is most often exercised in order to navigate the murky — and notoriously difficult, even on a jurisprudential level — world of human intent in homicide cases. Web Mining! These are cases in beggars opera which the law, for reasons of social utility and fairness, requires a jury’s pronouncement upon what many would argue is inherently unknowable. Some room for web mining reflection and capitalism, correction is necessary, in web mining all cases but especially in beggars opera these. In this case, however, the central issue — whether or not the defendant’s ability to perform a complex task such as driving was impaired by web mining, a controlled medication — was an multiple personality disorder cause ascertainable fact. Its determination on the evidence presented in this case was not a simple or an web mining easy task, to be sure, but there is no reason to cause, suppose that it was beyond the web mining, ability of the jury. That evidence, if necessarily circumstantial and incomplete, was nonetheless substantial in its quantity and its overall quality. Trial presentations for both sides were excellent.

I do not think the importance intelligence, jury’s verdict represented a miscarriage of justice. The defendant’s final argument — that medications taken as prescribed cannot be the basis of an OUI or a vehicular homicide conviction — misapprehends the conduct which G.L. c. 90, §§24 and 24G make criminal. Her argument to the contrary notwithstanding, neither the statutes, nor the conviction in this case, criminalizes the defendant’s mental illness, or her therapy. Web Mining! The offense is operating under the influence. What is forbidden is not taking medications as prescribed; it is getting behind the Applicant’s after Undergoing Employment Essay, wheel of web mining a motor vehicle while impaired, whether by these or by other, enumerated substances.

The OUI and vehicular homicide statutes on their face make no distinction between drug therapy and drug abuse. They instead require proof that the defendant operated a motor vehicle; that a listed substance impaired her ability to Essay of the Gangster and America, do so safely (for operating under), and that she thereby caused the death of another person (for vehicular homicide). Impairment by a prescription drug may be as dangerous as impairment by alcohol or a drug of abuse (which for some drugs is web mining precisely the reason a prescription is beggars opera required). The statute aims to keep the impaired driver off the road in either case. While there are undoubtedly degrees of culpability to be reckoned with, these are best addressed — and will be addressed in this case — in web mining sentencing. For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s Motion for Relief Pursuant to Mass. Beggars Opera! R. Crim. P. 25(b)(2) is web mining DENIED. The date for sentencing remains November 5, 2003 at 3:00 p.m., in Lowell. 1. A conviction for felony vehicular homicide requires findings both that the defendant was operating under the influence, and that she was operating to endanger(and that her operation caused the death of another). Misdemeanor vehicular homicide requires a finding either of operating under or operating to endanger, resulting in death.

Both operating under and operating to endanger are therefore lesser included offenses in relation to felony vehicular homicide. 2. The week that trial began I held an evidentiary hearing, over two mornings, concerning the admissibility under Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 419 Mass. 54 (1994), of of the Gangster Trooper Alvino’s testimony. It was my assessment that the scientific methods employed, and their application to this case, were sufficiently reliable to warrant admission of Trooper Alvino’s testimony. 3. With respect to diazepam and lorazepam, I took judicial notice (and so advised the jury), at the Commonwealth’s request, that these are “depressants,” because they appear on the attorney general’s list of controlled substances, incorporated by reference into c. 94C, §1 and thereby into c. 90, §§24(a) and 24G(a). Oxycodone’s status as a narcotic was established by the testimony of the web mining, Commonwealth’s medical expert, Dr. Brower. 4. Dr. Of Emotional! Abela asks his patients whether they have has a satisfactory experience with either or these medications. Usually, he prescribes Vicodin, but if the patient says that Percocet has worked well for her, he will prescribe Percocet. 5. She also stated that her dosages had been increased while she was in the hospital, and that this at web mining, first caused her to importance, feel “out of it” and to sleep a lot, but that “now they have no effect on me, and I’m fine.” In testimony that I excluded (after first asking if the defendant wished to waive the privilege which she had successfully asserted to exclude all prescribing information and warnings given by her psychotherapists, and being advised that she did not), she added that “the doctor said that it was completely fine for web mining me to be driving on define social them, because I asked him yesterday … and he said it was fine.

He said they have no effect on your driving.” 6. Dr. Balser and the police witnesses were in agreement that the decision whether or not to test for intoxication is a medical one, made by the physician and not under the direction of law enforcement. 7. This description of the defendant’s affect could be interpreted as at least generally consistent with the description, given by Dr. Web Mining! Brower, of the calming and sedating effects of lorazepam and diazepam.

The jury might also have concluded, reasonably, that the effects of these medications would be less familiar to a layperson, including a police officer, than the effects of, say, alcohol. 8. Krusen recalled a Ford Ranger pickup (he drives one too) of an indeterminate color, possible two-toned, driven by a female with brown hair. Applicant’s After Employment! Curcio remembered a small pickup whose color was unusual, unfamiliar to him, and web mining, difficult to describe beyond a “very dark green with something mixed in”; the driver was a female, in her late teens or early 20s, with shoulder-length brown hair and looking “intense.” 9. Social Capitalism! The jury were instructed that the charges against the defendant all pertained to web mining, the accident with Evan Holofcener, not to the incident involving Krusen and Curcio. 10. At the defendant’s request, and over the Commonwealth’s energetically pressed objection, I gave the jury a “specific unanimity” instruction, requiring that they agree on which of the three scheduled medications (if any) had impaired the intelligence, defendant’s ability to drive. “[W]hen the web mining, Commonwealth introduces at trial evidence of alternate incidents that could support the charge against the defendant, the Essay about Evolution, jury must unanimously agree on which specific act constitutes the offense charged.” Commonwealth v. Kirkpatrick, 423 Mass. Web Mining! 436, 442 (1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. Theories! 1015 (1996). Here, there was evidence of ingestion of multiple controlled medications, but a single homicide resulting from a single operation of a motor vehicle.

Massachusetts law is less than clear (to this judge at least) as to whether a specific unanimity instruction was required in a case such as this. 11. The jury could reasonably have credited Curcio’s identification of the truck, and attributed Krusen’s failure to identify it to the fact that he had been the driver, and therefore, preoccupied. 12. The SJC noted in Woodward, “Since 1979, the Commonwealth has appealed verdict reductions in web mining only ten cases, of which seven were affirmed.” 427 Mass. at 667. Personality! Eight of these cases (cited in web mining note 12 to Gangster, that opinion) were homicides; the other two were drug cases, in which trafficking convictions were reduced to possession with intent to distribute. Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and web mining, operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. 57 Mass. App.

Ct. 80. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. Argued February 7, 2002. Decided January 15, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. Esther J. Horwich, Boston, for the defendant. Jeremy C. Bucci, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Present: GELINAS, CYPHER, #038; KANTROWITZ, JJ. The defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation, based on evidence that he was operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. Probation had been imposed on Self-Perception after Interview Essay November 16, 1999, in web mining Brighton District Court, after the defendant admitted to sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty on Employment Interview a charge of operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. The judge continued the case without a finding and placed the web mining, defendant under the supervision of summarise a probation officer on web mining terms that, among others, required that he “obey all court orders and local, [S]tate and [F]ederal laws” until May 19, 2000. On January 2, 2000, the defendant was stopped by the Mashpee police on his way home from a football game.

The stop resulted in multiple personality new charges being lodged against the defendant in Falmouth District Court for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and operating a motor vehicle under a suspended license. The new offense triggered the issuance of a written notice of a probation violation from the Brighton District Court, stating the defendant was not in compliance with the web mining, terms of his probation because of the new complaint. After a hearing on March 3, 2000, the judge found that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation on the basis of his admission to the Mashpee police during his arrest that he had driven his car earlier in the day. The judge entered a guilty finding,1 and modified the terms of probation by extending the Essay about Gangster, probationary period to one year from the web mining, date of the hearing and imposing a suspended, ten-day house of correction sentence.2. On appeal, the defendant argues that the beggars opera, entry of web mining a guilty finding and the order modifying the terms of his probation should be reversed because (1) the grounds stated as the reason for revoking his probation were different from those for beggars opera which he had received written notification; (2) the defendant’s admission was unreliable, because the web mining, police officer who testified was unsure of the exact statement, and because it was contradicted by other information contained in the police reports; (3) the admission was insufficient, as a matter of law, to support a finding that he had violated the law, because it was uncorroborated; and (4) his admission was not the product of voluntary actions, because at the time of the admission he was intoxicated, and prior to his admission he had not been given his Miranda warnings. We affirm the revocation decision. We summarize the relevant facts as presented at the revocation hearing. On January 2, 2000, Officer Jon Read of the Mashpee police department was traveling northbound on after Undergoing Employment Interview Essay Route 130.

He was forced to steer his police cruiser to the right in order to avoid being hit by a green sport utility vehicle that had crossed the center line. Read testified at the hearing that he was unable to see who was driving or how many people were in the vehicle. Web Mining! He turned his cruiser around and headed southbound on Route 130 in search of the vehicle. Summarise Of Attachment! Read found it parked at the side of the road. Read observed the web mining, defendant standing toward the back of the vehicle, on theories of attachment the driver’s side. Read stopped, exited, and walked toward the defendant.

As Read approached, the defendant walked to the passenger side of the web mining, vehicle, sat in Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview Essay the passenger seat, and began to look through the glove box. Web Mining! Read asked the beggars opera, defendant where the driver was; the web mining, defendant did not respond.3 At about that time, another individual, Kevin Crosby, the defendant’s son-in-law, emerged from the woods by the side of the road, where he apparently had been urinating. Read asked both the defendant and Applicant’s after Undergoing, Crosby who was driving; neither responded. Web Mining! Read observed food and a cooler with numerous beers in it in the rear of the vehicle. Read determined that the defendant was the owner of the vehicle.

Read determined that both the defendant and Crosby were under the influence of alcohol, and placed both in protective custody. Officer Paul Coronella was called and arrived at the scene. Multiple Personality! The defendant was placed in the rear of Coronella’s police car and Crosby was placed in the rear of web mining Read’s police car, both for transportation to Gangster, the police station. En route to the station, Crosby had a conversation with Read in which Crosby stated that the defendant was the driver. When Read arrived at the station with Crosby, he informed Coronella that Crosby had implicated the web mining, defendant as the driver. Define Social Capitalism! Read obtained a signed, written statement from web mining Crosby that the defendant was the driver.

After conducting sobriety tests, which he said the defendant failed, Coronella placed the defendant under arrest for operating the motor vehicle on Undergoing Route 130 while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. A breathalyzer test revealed the defendant to have a blood alcohol reading of .16. Officer Sean Sullivan, who had been called to inventory the contents of the web mining, defendant’s vehicle at the scene, stated in his report that, at the station, he noticed that both the defendant and Crosby “exhibited extreme symptoms of intoxication.” Coronella’s report of the booking procedure stated that the defendant was read and summarise theories, understood his Miranda rights. Read testified that he believed he remembered that the defendant had been read his rights at that point. According to web mining, both Coronella’s and Read’s reports, after the booking procedure, the defendant was again asked how he had arrived at the football game that day. Beggars Opera! Both Coronella’s and Read’s reports explain that the defendant answered that he drove from his house in Brockton to his son-in-law’s, Crosby’s, home in East Bridgewater. Crosby then drove the defendant’s vehicle to the game. When pressed on this point during cross-examination, Read testified that he had no memory of the defendant telling him that his sister had given him a ride to Crosby’s house, but acknowledged that it was “possible” the defendant had made such a comment.

The judge did not credit Crosby’s statement, as related by Officer Read, that the defendant had been driving the vehicle at web mining, the time it was stopped. Rather, the judge credited the defendant’s admission, as reported by Coronella and Read, that he had driven from his house to Crosby’s house, the first leg of the trip to the football game.4. On these facts, the defendant raises several issues implicating due process; we find no merit to his contentions and we affirm. Written Notification. The defendant first argues that the written notice of surrender referenced only the two charges for which he was arrested by the Mashpee police, and contained no reference to personality cause, the uncharged misconduct that occurred earlier in web mining the day, when he drove from his home to Crosby’s home under a suspended license. The issue was first raised in the defendant’s second motion for reconsideration, which was denied by the judge who had found a probation violation. We agree with the defendant that the written notice was limited on its face to the two charges filed in connection with the incident that occurred on beggars opera Route 130, and that the web mining, notice of violation of probation did not include mention of his operating the motor vehicle on theories of attachment a public way earlier in the day.5 The Commonwealth appears to concede that, because of lack of notice, the earlier operation cannot form the basis of the instant revocation. We disagree.6.

While there can be no doubt that written notice of the claimed violations are included among the “minimum requirements of due process,” Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. 108, 112-113, 551 N.E.2d 1193 (1990),7 due process is not an inflexible concept. Ibid. Flexibility is important both to web mining, insure the offender the opportunity inherent in the grant of conditional liberty that probation affords, and to insure the Essay about Evolution of the, Commonwealth the ability to deal expeditiously with a violation of web mining that opportunity. See id. at 113-116, 551 N.E.2d 1193. See also Commonwealth v. Sheridan, 51 Mass.App.Ct.

74, 76-77, 743 N.E.2d 856 (2001). Social Capitalism! A probation revocation is not a criminal prosecution. Commonwealth v. Durling, 407 Mass. at 112, 551 N.E.2d 1193. In this case, the web mining, written notice did not specifically state the basis upon beggars opera which the judge based the revocation. The defendant’s admission, however, of having driven the vehicle earlier in the day was included in web mining the police reports that were generated in relation to the charges listed on about Evolution and America the notice of probation violation. In any event, assuming that the failure to specifically enumerate the misconduct on the face of the notice constitutes error, the issue remains whether the defendant was afforded due process. We conclude that the actions of defense counsel in introducing the issue at the inception of the hearing, and in vigorously cross-examining the officer on the issue, amply support the conclusion that any error here was harmless. Web Mining! For example, at the opening of the hearing, counsel indicated that the defendant’s principal concern was with the then-pending operating under the influence charge. With respect to the remaining issue, operating after suspension of license, she indicated a willingness to admit if the court were to accept a recommended disposition on multiple personality the probation violation.

After discussion about a possible disposition, counsel told the judge the following: “There is a second matter of operating after a suspended license. And there are two incidents of operation, one of which I understand my client is accused of web mining admitting that he did. I’m not saying that is his position, but in the police report it indicates something to that effect. “If we could just go forward with regard to that issue and not stipulate to the OUI, it would still be a technical violation.” (Emphasis supplied.) At a later stage in the proceeding, counsel engaged in vigorous cross-examination of the of emotional intelligence, officer with regard to the defendant’s statement that he had driven the car earlier in the day, and went so far as to elicit a statement from the officer that the defendant might also have told him that a family member, rather than the defendant, drove the car to Crosby’s house. Counsel was amply prepared at the start of the hearing to consider the issue of the defendant’s admitting to the first occasion of driving after suspension of web mining his license. On the facts of this case, the defendant is unable to demonstrate prejudice resulting from any lack of notice, and this failure to show prejudice is fatal to his claim of error. See Delisle v. Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 359, 362, 622 N.E.2d 601 (1993). Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing Employment Essay! See also Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Odoardi, 397 Mass. 28, 31-32, 489 N.E.2d 674 (1986).

Compare Commonwealth v. Streeter, 50 Mass.App.Ct. 128, 131-132, 735 N.E.2d 403 (2000). Exclusion of the Undergoing Essay, evidence. The defendant next contends that his admission to web mining, police that he had been driving earlier in the day should have been excluded because (a) the statement was made either prior to his being given his Miranda warnings or, if made after the warnings, his waiver was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent due to his state of intoxication; (b) again due to his state of intoxication, the statement was not made voluntarily for the purposes of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and art. 12 of the theories of attachment, Massachusetts Declaration of Rights and therefore should not have been considered; and (c) the alleged admission was unreliable and insufficient to form the basis of the probation surrender, since it lacked corroborative evidence and was contradicted by information contained in the police reports. We disagree with all three contentions. (a) Miranda issue. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence adduced at the hearing amply demonstrates that he was afforded his Miranda rights before he made the statement that formed the basis of the violation.

The record shows that the conversation reported by web mining, Coronella, in which the define social, defendant admitted to driving the web mining, vehicle that morning, took place after the defendant had been given his warnings; Read’s testimony at the hearing supports this version of Self-Perception Employment events.8. Moreover, even were we to agree that the defendant’s admission was obtained prior to his being given his Miranda rights, the statements were admissible. Following the rationale established in United States v. Web Mining! Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974), and in certain other Federal cases dealing with the use of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the Supreme Judicial Court, in beggars opera Commonwealth v. Vincente, 405 Mass. Web Mining! 278, 279-281, 540 N.E.2d 669 (1989), ruled that, even though certain statements made by a defendant were properly suppressed at trial as having been obtained in violation of the defendant’s Miranda rights, those same inculpatory statements, perhaps subject to multiple disorder cause, certain considerations not present here, might properly provide the basis for a probation surrender. Where, as here, the primary focus of the police inquiry, including the arrest of the defendant and Crosby for reasons of web mining protective custody, and the ensuing questioning, sobriety tests, and after Essay, ultimate charge were to prosecute the web mining, incident of Essay driving under the influence, the exclusion at a probation revocation hearing of the defendant’s statement would be unlikely to serve any deterrent purpose. See Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass.

491, 493-494, 541 N.E.2d 1003 (1989). See also Commonwealth v. Vincente, supra at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669. (b) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment voluntariness. Simon next argues that the statement he made at web mining, the police station should have been inadmissible at the probation revocation hearing, on the. basis that it was not made voluntarily due to importance, his intoxication, and therefore was taken in violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights.

The defendant’s claim of intoxication, standing alone, is insufficient to establish that his statement was involuntary. See Commonwealth v. Griffin, 19 Mass.App.Ct. Web Mining! 174, 183 #038; n. 8, 472 N.E.2d 1354 (1985). In any event, even were we to conclude otherwise, the defendant is not entitled to relief. In the context of a criminal trial, where evidence of intoxication has been presented, and the voluntariness of statements is in issue, even where there is no question that Miranda warnings were given before a defendant made admissions, a trial judge is obliged to make an affirmative finding on the voluntariness of those admissions under the of emotional, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments before a jury is web mining allowed to consider them. Define Social! See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Van Melkebeke, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 364, 366, 720 N.E.2d 834 (1999). Essay About! See also Commonwealth v. Mello, 420 Mass. Web Mining! 375, 383, 649 N.E.2d 1106 (1995) (“special care is taken to review the issue of voluntariness where the defendant claims to have been under the influence of drugs or alcohol”).

Such special care with regard to Essay about of the Gangster and America, intoxication is necessary; the web mining, United States Supreme Court has noted, “as interrogators have turned to more subtle forms of social capitalism psychological persuasion, courts have found the mental condition of the defendant a more significant factor in the `voluntariness’ calculus.” Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. Web Mining! 157, 164, 107 S.Ct. 515, 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986). Although we have found no case in Massachusetts that resolves whether a similarly careful inquiry to determine admissibility need take place on the bases of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process at a probation revocation hearing, we find instructive the reasoning in the decisional law related to Fourth Amendment violations. Of Emotional Intelligence! In such circumstances, most Federal courts refuse to apply the exclusionary rule to probation revocation proceedings absent evidence of police harassment, or at web mining, least police knowledge of the petitioner’s probationary status. See United States v. Gravina, 906 F.Supp. 50, 53-54 (D.Mass. Summarise Theories Of Attachment! 1995).9 Nothing in the evidence here points to police harassment when the defendant was interviewed or when he made the statement after being read his Miranda rights. Compare United States v. Web Mining! Gravina, supra at 54, quoting from United States v. Personality Cause! James, 893 F.Supp. 649, 650-651 (E.D.Tex.1995) (“an element of constancy should be present in web mining the type of beggars opera harassment necessary to invoke the web mining, exclusionary rule…. [W]here harassment may be a singular act, at least some irregularity in the conduct of the multiple personality disorder cause, police officials must be present”). While the police officers were aware of Simon’s probationary status, only.

two Federal jurisdictions exclude statements for this reason alone.10 See, e.g., United States v. Gravina, supra at 53-54. See also note 9, supra. Further, the police had already placed the defendant under arrest for driving under the influence, and the record shows that their inquiry was targeted to web mining, elicit evidence in Essay Evolution of the Gangster support of a conviction on that offense, rather than for the purpose of web mining eliciting information by which probation could be revoked. Theories Of Attachment! Compare Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Vincente, 405 Mass. at of emotional intelligence, 280, 540 N.E.2d 669, and cases cited (“The Federal courts have concluded that, in most instances, a police officer is web mining primarily interested in obtaining evidence with which to convict a defendant. Revocation of probation is generally only a minor consideration, and of emotional, therefore the risk that illegally obtained evidence might be excluded from such proceedings is likely to web mining, have only a marginal additional deterrent effect on illegal police misconduct”).

In addition, we note that the United States Supreme Court has drawn no distinction in its analysis of the “voluntary” waiver of the personal right against self-incrimination protected by the Miranda warnings on summarise theories the one hand, and the due process-based “voluntariness” of a statement protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments on the other hand. See Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. at 169-170, 107 S.Ct. 515. Similarly, the Supreme Court “cautioned against expanding `currently applicable exclusionary rules,’” into an area where they could serve little purpose in the protection of web mining constitutional guarantees against police overreaching. See id. at 166, 107 S.Ct. 515, quoting from Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 488-489, 92 S.Ct. 619, 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972). We see no reason that the exclusionary rule be applied in these circumstances. Multiple Disorder! “In Federal law and in web mining most jurisdictions, the exclusionary rule does not apply as a matter of course to multiple personality disorder, probation revocation proceedings because the `application of the exclusionary rule is restricted to those areas where its remedial objectives are thought most efficaciously served.’ See Commonwealth v. Vincente, supra at web mining, 280, 540 N.E.2d 669, quoting [from] United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 348, 94 S.Ct.

613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974).” Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass. at 493, 541 N.E.2d 1003. “`Evidence that a probationer is not complying with the conditions of probation may indicate that he or she has not been rehabilitated and Self-Perception Undergoing Interview, continues to pose a threat to the public.’ Commonwealth v. Vincente, supra at 280, 540 N.E.2d 669. Accordingly, the State has an web mining overwhelming interest in being able to return an individual to imprisonment without the burden of a new adversary criminal trial if in fact [the probationer] has failed to beggars opera, abide by the conditions of his [or her probation].’ Morrissey [v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471,] 483, 92 S.Ct. [2593], 2601[, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)]. We weigh this overwhelming State interest in web mining admitting all reliable evidence against the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule.” Commonwealth v. Olsen, supra at 493-494, 541 N.E.2d 1003. Thus, we conclude that the exclusionary rule does not render the defendant’s statement inadmissible, even were we to determine that the statement had been given involuntarily, when, as here, there is no evidence that the statement was the product of importance of emotional police harassment or the web mining, result of a police focus to obtain evidence specifically for a probation revocation hearing. (c) Reliability of the admission. Simon finally argues that the statement, that he operated the vehicle from his home to Crosby’s home that morning, is insufficiently reliable, first because it is about Evolution of the and America unsubstantiated by web mining, other corroborating evidence, and, second, because it is hearsay, reported by one officer, and contradicted by other evidence in multiple the hearing. Web Mining! Although a probation revocation hearing is not a criminal trial, and Essay of the Gangster and America, the defendant need not be given the “full panoply of constitutional protections,” due process requires that probationers be afforded some protections upon an attempt to revoke their probation, as liberty interests are at stake. Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Durling, 407 Mass. at 112, 551 N.E.2d 1193.

The rules, however, are flexible; hearsay is admissible, and all reliable evidence should be considered. See id. at 113-117, 551 N.E.2d 1193. About Of The! Even the web mining, right of of emotional confrontation may be denied if the “hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation.” Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

See Durling, supra at 115, 551 N.E.2d 1193. At a revocation hearing, due process has the ultimate goal of providing an accurate determination as to whether revocation is web mining proper. See Durling, supra at social capitalism, 116, 551 N.E.2d 1193. Here, there was ample evidence to web mining, corroborate the defendant’s statement. Importance Intelligence! It is undisputed that the two went to web mining, the football game in the defendant’s car. The defendant lived a distance from Crosby’s home, and the two were returning there when they were stopped by the police. No other explanation was offered of how the defendant and his vehicle got from his home to Crosby’s.11 The cases cited by the defendant in of the Gangster and America his brief, Commonwealth v. Forde, 392 Mass. 453, 457, 466 N.E.2d 510 (1984), and Commonwealth v. Leonard, 401 Mass. 470, 473, 517 N.E.2d 157 (1988), are inapposite; in neither case was there anything at all to corroborate the admission. As there was corroboration in this instance, we need not reach the issue whether corroboration is in web mining fact necessary for an admission in the context of a hearing on surrender. As to the claim that the Evolution Gangster, hearsay was unreliable, we note only that Read testified that he was present when the defendant admitted to driving earlier in the day, and that he had made a note of it in web mining his police report.

Read was present at the hearing and subject to cross-examination. The statement was an admission against interest made by the defendant to about, police officers at a time when the officers were investigating him for another alleged crime, operating under the influence. The defendant, though present in court, chose to remain silent. Declarations against penal interest are admissible for web mining the truth of the matters asserted. See Commonwealth v. Cruz, 53 Mass.App.Ct. 393, 401, 759 N.E.2d 723 (2001); Liacos, Brodin #038; Avery, Massachusetts Evidence § 8.10, at multiple personality disorder, 516 (7th ed.1999). The hearsay was both credible and web mining, reliable. Order revoking probation affirmed. 1. Define Capitalism! See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Villalobos, 437 Mass. Web Mining! 797, 800-801, 777 N.E.2d 116 (2002) (where defendant admits to sufficient facts, judge continues case without a finding, and defendant then fails to meet any conditions attached to the continuance, he may be found guilty and sentenced).

2. In accordance with Rule 9 of the define social capitalism, District Court Rules for Probation Violation Proceedings (West 2001), the proceedings, which resulted in the imposition of a guilty finding and the revocation of straight probation, were properly handled pursuant to web mining, the procedures applicable to a probation revocation. See generally Commonwealth v. Maggio, 414 Mass. 193, 195-196, 605 N.E.2d 1247 (1993). 3. We look to the testimony given by Officer Read at the surrender hearing. Police reports filed after the arrest indicate a somewhat different answer to Read’s initial questions. Any variance is define social capitalism not material to our decision. 4. Web Mining! At the beggars opera, conclusion of the web mining, hearing, the judge unequivocally stated that he did not credit Crosby’s statement. In his written findings, the judge noted that he found the defendant in violation based upon his operation after suspension. He also indicated that evidence on beggars opera which he relied in making the finding included “Mashpee police reports”; “Statement of Kevin Crosby”; “Mashpee P.O. John Read”; “Breath test on D.” Given the web mining, written finding that revocation was based on “Operating motor vehicle while suspended,” and the judge’s unequivocal statement that he was not relying on Crosby’s statement, we adopt the view that the revocation was based on the defendant’s admission that he had been operating the vehicle earlier that day. Both the Commonwealth and the defendant adopt that position in this appeal.

5. With respect to the alleged violations, the notice stated in full: “You are hereby notified of the following alleged violation(s) of the probation order that was issued to social, you in web mining the criminal case identified above: You violated a criminal law of the [C]ommonwealth, namely: January 2, 2000 ct process 0089CR00009A op. Beggars Opera! under infl. # 0089CR00009B op. Web Mining! after susp. lic.” 6. The Commonwealth, having conceded that notice was defective, argues that, even though the trial judge indicated in his findings that he did not rely on Crosby’s statement that the defendant was driving, there is ample additional circumstantial evidence to tie the defendant to summarise of attachment, the operation of the web mining, vehicle at the time of the stop. Having determined that revocation was proper on the grounds cited by the judge, we need not reach the Commonwealth’s arguments in of emotional this regard. 7. Web Mining! See as well Rule 3(b)(ii) of the District Court Rules for Probation Violation Proceedings, which sets forth notice requirements. The rule went into effect four days prior to the notice of surrender. 8. Coronella’s report states in Applicant’s after Employment Interview Essay pertinent part: “During the booking process [the defendant] was read his Miranda rights state [sic ] that he understood them. [The defendant] was read his rights under [G.L. Web Mining! c.] 265 section 5a and stated that he wanted to take the breath test. [The defendant] was given the test and the results were as follows…. [The defendant] was again asked how he got to the … game. He stated that he drove from his house in Brockton to Crosby home in East Bridgewater, picked up Crosby and then Crosby drove his vehicle to cause, the game.” Read verified during his testimony at the hearing that the statements were made after Miranda warnings were read at web mining, the station. 9. The United States District Court for Massachusetts explained: (1) the Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits have refused to apply the exclusionary rule to evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment when determining probation, parole, or supervised release revocation; (2) most of beggars opera these jurisdictions provide an web mining exception that such evidence is inadmissible where the defendant suffered harassment; (3) the Second Circuit applies the exclusionary rule where the probation officer is aware of the target’s probationary status, but not where a police officer is unaware of that status; and (4) the Fourth Circuit “stands alone” in excluding all evidence obtained by unconstitutional searches from probation revocation hearings. See United States v. Gravina, supra, and cases cited. See also Annot., Admissibility, in Federal Probation Revocation Proceeding, of importance intelligence Evidence Obtained Through Unreasonable Search and Seizure or in Absence of Miranda Warnings, 30 A.L.R. Fed.

824, 829-835 (1976 #038; Supp.2002). 10. The Supreme Judicial Court, in web mining Commonwealth v. Olsen, 405 Mass. 491, 496, 541 N.E.2d 1003 (1989), expressly left open the question whether a police officer’s knowledge of a probationer’s status would compel exclusion of evidence obtained. 11. Defense counsel makes much of the fact that on cross-examination, Read admitted that it was possible that he had been told that a family member had driven the defendant from his home to Crosby’s home.

This statement came after vigorous cross-examination in which Read stated that he did not recall any statement that the defendant had made to the effect that a family member had driven to of attachment, Crosby’s. Any determination of the web mining, weight and credibility of Applicant’s after Undergoing Read’s testimony was for the judge, and the contradiction was not so egregious as to web mining, cause us to conclude that the judge committed plain error. See Commonwealth v. Tate, 34 Mass.App.Ct. About Evolution Of The! 446, 450-451, 612 N.E.2d 686 (1993). DUI OUI offense, Defendant, was stopped at web mining, a sobriety checkpoint, the trooper, although he had made no observations of the manner in which she had been operating her vehicle, directed her to an area adjacent to the checkpoint for theories administration of field sobriety tests. 76 Mass.App.Ct. 908. Cheryl A. BAZINET.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts. James M. Milligan, Jr., Norwell, for the defendant. Michelle R. King, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. Cheryl Bazinet, the defendant, was stopped at a sobriety checkpoint on web mining Route 20 in beggars opera the town of Auburn on July 22, 2007. A State trooper working the checkpoint spoke with her and web mining, detected an of attachment odor of alcohol. Consequently, the trooper, although he had made no observations of the manner in which she had been operating her vehicle, directed her to web mining, an area adjacent to the checkpoint for administration of field sobriety tests. When Bazinet stepped out of the vehicle, the trooper observed that she had ?glossy, bloodshot eyes? accompanied by ?a strong odor of an intoxicating beverage on her breath as she spoke.? Bazinet consented to a breath test which revealed an beggars opera alcohol level greater than .08%, and she was charged with operating under the influence. See G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1). Before trial, Bazinet moved to dismiss the complaint on grounds that the checkpoint procedures were not consistent with constitutional requirements.

Before hearing the motion, a judge of the District Court reported the case for web mining an answer to two questions of law he said arose frequently in the District Court. See Mass.R.Crim.P. Capitalism! 34, as amended, 442 Mass. 1501 (2004); Mass.R.A.P. 5, as amended, 378 Mass. 930 (1979). See generally Commonwealth v. Caracciola, 409 Mass. 648, 650, 569 N.E.2d 774 (1991).

The questions are these: ?1. The Massachusetts State Police General Order (TRF-15) [which governed operation of the checkpoint] permits a trooper, with reasonable suspicion based upon articulable facts that the web mining, operator is OUI, to further detain an operator directing them from the screening area to the OUI checking area (Pit). Is mere odor of alcohol sufficient reasonable suspicion to further detain an operator for further testing? ?2. Is the Massachusetts State Police guideline on sobriety checkpoints (general order TRF-15) as applied to the sobriety checkpoint stop in about of the question on.

July 21, 2007 through the Division Commander’s Order (06-DFS,056),[[1] constitutionally valid?? The general subject of the reported questions was discussed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Commonwealth v. Murphy, 454 Mass. 318, 910 N.E.2d 281 (2009), a case decided after the report. In essence, the court in Murphy held that sobriety checkpoint procedures carried out in a manner consistent with Massachusetts State Police General Order TRF-15, as supplemented by written operational instructions from the troop commander to web mining, the officer in charge of a specific checkpoint, met constitution standards. Id. at 328, 910 N.E.2d 281. We think that the decision in Murphy requires an affirmative answer to beggars opera, both questions. Insofar as question one is concerned, General Order TRF-15 permits, and web mining, now requires, see Murphy, supra at 320 n. 3, 910 N.E.2d 281, further screening after the initial checkpoint stop ?[i]f there is reasonable suspicion, based upon articulable facts, that the operator … is define capitalism committing … an OUI violation.? In Murphy, the troop commander’s order, like the troop commander’s order in this case, stated that further screening after the initial stop ?should be made? if the web mining, screening officer observed ?any articulable sign of possible intoxication.?

Murphy, supra at 321, 910 N.E.2d 281. The court said that the ?odor of alcohol? was one of the ?clues of beggars opera impaired operation? for which the screening officers were to web mining, check and which, if observed, would provide a basis for Applicant’s after Employment Interview Essay further screening and investigation. Id. at 320, 328, 910 N.E.2d 281.2 The court’s judgment in web mining that regard is consistent with judgments made by courts in social capitalism other States that have considered similar questions. See State v. Rizzo, 243 Mich.App. 151, 161, 622 N.W.2d 319 (2000) (holding that ?an odor may give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the web mining, motorist has recently consumed intoxicating liquor, which may have affected the motorist’s ability to operate a motor vehicle?); Nickelson v. Kansas Dept. of Rev., 33 Kan.App.2d 359, 367, 102 P.3d 490 (2004) (finding that odor of multiple cause alcohol was sufficient to allow officer to conduct further investigation); State v. Hernandez-Rodriguez, Ohio App. 11th Dist. No. Web Mining! 2006-P-0121, 2007-Ohio-5200, 2007 WL 2821957 (Sept. About Gangster! 28, 2007) (explaining that ?the ?strong odor? of alcohol, by itself, can trigger reasonable suspicion of driving under the influence?).

Turning to web mining, question two, the define capitalism, opinion in Murphy did not consider the Division Commander’s Order 07-DFS-056, which is designed to cover all highway safety programs, not simply those designed to detect drivers who are impaired by alcohol. From the record, however, it appears that the checkpoint the State police conducted in this case was governed both by General Order TRF-15 and by operational instructions contained in a letter from the troop commander to the officer in charge of the checkpoint, as well as by Order 07-DFS-056. Web Mining! Order TRF-15. and the operational instructions are, in all material respects, identical to of emotional, the instructions discussed by the court in Murphy. As noted, the court ruled that checkpoints carried out in accordance with those orders were constitutional. Insofar as Order 07-DFS-056 adds something new to web mining, the instructional matrix, it imposes a ?zero tolerance? enforcement policy with respect to all observed violations, thus reducing further the kind of discretionary enforcement that in other cases has been found constitutionally wanting. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. McGeoghegan, 389 Mass. 137, 143-144, 449 N.E.2d 349 (1983); Commonwealth v. Anderson, 406 Mass. Beggars Opera! 343, 347, 547 N.E.2d 1134 (1989).

In light of the foregoing, the answer to reported questions one and two is web mining ?yes.? 1. This appears to beggars opera, be a typographical error. The Division Commander’s Order included in web mining the record appendix is numbered ?07-DFS-56.? 2. The court’s complete list of ?clues of impaired operation? was ?the condition of the eyes of the operator, the odor of Essay about Evolution and America alcohol, the speech of the operator, alcohol in plain sight in the vehicle, and other indicators.? Murphy, supra at 320, 910 N.E.2d 281. Web Mining! Later in Applicant’s after Employment Interview Essay the opinion, the web mining, court said that ?TRF-15 requires a predicate of reasonable articulable suspicion based on the observations of the beggars opera, initial screening officer (e.g., red eyes, slurred speech, container of alcohol in plain view),? omitting ?odor of alcohol? from that list.

Id. at 328, 910 N.E.2d 281. We think that nothing of consequence flows from the omission. As a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on web mining January 26, 2008, a Superior Court jury convicted the defendant Shelley King of (1) operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of define social capitalism intoxicating liquor (OUI), G. Web Mining! L. Beggars Opera! c. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1); and (2) reckless or negligent operation of a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a). COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT. Entered: January 27, 2011. NOTICE: Decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to web mining, its rule 1:28 are primarily addressed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panel’s decisional rationale.

Moreover, rule 1:28 decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28, issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the beggars opera, limitations noted above, not as binding precedent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28. As a consequence of a motor vehicle accident on January 26, 2008, a Superior Court jury convicted the web mining, defendant Shelley King of (1) operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of capitalism intoxicating liquor (OUI), G. Web Mining! L. c. Define Social! 90, § 24(1)(a)(1); and (2) reckless or negligent operation of web mining a motor vehicle, G. L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a). Essay About Of The Gangster And America! On the day following the rendition of the jury’s verdicts, the presiding judge conducted a bench trial, found that the defendant had incurred three prior OUI convictions, and found her guilty of the enhanced charge of OUI, fourth offense, G. L. c. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1), sixth par. On the web mining, same day, the defendant pleaded guilty to the charge of OUI after suspension or revocation of her driver’s license for prior conviction of of emotional OUI, G. L. c. 90, § 23. Upon the convictions for web mining OUI fourth, the Self-Perception Undergoing Employment, judge sentenced the defendant to four and one-half to five years’ confinement at State prison; upon web mining the conviction for operation after suspension or revocation by after Undergoing Essay, reason of prior OUI conviction, the judge imposed a sentence of web mining two and one-half years’ confinement at Essay Evolution of the Gangster and America, the house of correction from and after completion of the web mining, State prison sentence; and upon the conviction of reckless or negligent operation, the judge sentenced the defendant to two years at the house of correction to Applicant’s Employment Essay, run concurrently with her sentence at State prison. The defendant has appealed upon two grounds: (1) that the web mining, judge failed to follow appropriate procedure for determination of the importance of emotional, exposure of members of the jury to prejudicial publicity during the course of the trial; and (2) that the judge improperly exercised personal feelings, rather than objective criteria, in the determination of the web mining, sentences.

For the following reasons, we reject the defendant’s appellate contentions and affirm the define, convictions and the sentences. Factual background. The evidence permitted the jury to find the following facts. On the afternoon of January 26, 2008, the defendant consumed four or five beers at her home in Lynn between 2:45 P. M. and 6:00 P. M. At about 6:00 P. M., she left the web mining, house in order to purchase take-home food from a delicatessen in beggars opera the city. She took with her an additional can of beer, opened it, and web mining, put it in her handbag in the car. Self-Perception Undergoing Employment Essay! At a major intersection in web mining Lynn and after she had taken a drink from the open can, she made an unlawful turn across three lanes, up and over a median island, and across two more lanes, so as to drive up to and against the front door of a restaurant (not the Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment, restaurant to which she was headed for purchase of food). The impact of travel over the island and web mining, possibly up against the restaurant entrance resulted in a bleeding chin wound requiring seven stitches. A samaritan offered immediate assistance. She did not respond to beggars opera, his instruction to put the car in park gear; he did so and turned off the web mining, ignition. He noticed that her speech was slow and that an define social capitalism odor of alcohol was in her breath.

A Lynn police officer responding to the scene also smelled alcohol both from her breath and from the web mining, interior of the automobile. About Evolution Of The And America! The officer also observed glassy and bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. He saw the open beer can inside the automobile. He formed the opinion that she had been driving under the influence of alcohol. At trial, after two days of empanelment and testimony, the Lynn Item newspaper published a morning article about the case. The story carried the headline, ‘Trial begins for Lynn mom charged with 5th OUI.’ The article stated that she had incurred three ‘drunken driving’ convictions during the 1990?s and a fourth in 2004. The article stated also that she ‘blew a.15 alcohol blood level when arrested’ for the current incident. At the beginning of the third day of trial, all counsel and the judge discussed the appearance of the article. Web Mining! When the jury entered the courtroom, the judge addressed the following question to them. ‘Has any member of the summarise, jury read, seen, heard or overheard anything from any source about any aspect of this case outside of the courtroom, since yesterday, that has affected or would affect your ability to consider this case in any way as a fair and impartial juror? Nobody’s raising their hand.’

He added a second question. ‘Has anybody seen or heard anything about any publicity from the web mining, news media about this case? Please raise your hand if there is any–anything you’ve heard at define social capitalism, all, even the tiniest thing. Okay, nobody is raising their hand. Okay. All right, so we will resume with the trial.’ Defense counsel did not object to the judge’s treatment of the issue of exposure to prejudicial publicity by these questions. Later that day, after the close of the evidence and in the course of final instructions to the jury, the judge reminded the jury at three points that they must base their verdict exclusively upon the evidence comprised of web mining testimony and about Gangster, exhibits received in the courtroom.

Again, defense counsel had no objections to the pertinent portions of the instruction. After the return of the jury verdicts, the finding of the bench trial, and web mining, the submission of the plea of multiple personality cause guilty to operating after suspension or revocation for prior OUI violations, the judge imposed sentencing from the bench. His comments included the following. ‘This is a sad case. I understand that I have a limited amount of information about what happened and about the [d]efendant, but it’s pretty obvious to me that, from what I have received, that the [d]efendant Ms. King is probably a very nice person and web mining, she probably–it’s not hard to see that she’s probably had a difficult life; I am sensitive to these things. But the sentence I’m going to impose is necessary, in my view.’ The judge then specified the sentence for each offense. Summarise Theories! At the conclusion of his announcement of the respective sentences, he made the following one-sentence statement. Web Mining! ‘I assume it’s obvious what my feelings are about why this sentence is required.’ The remark brought no objection.

On the same day, the judge docketed a Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Guidelines Sentence Form. In the multiple, appropriate space for explanation of the departure from the web mining, guidelines, he wrote, ‘Upward departure because of the of emotional intelligence, egregious nature of the offenses, surrounding circumstances and web mining, prior record.’ Newspaper article. On appeal and for the first time, the defendant argues that the Applicant’s after Undergoing Employment, judge should have conducted individual voir dire interrogation of each juror in order to determine whether he or she had experienced any exposure to the Lynn Item newspaper article. The article had obvious prejudicial potential by reason of web mining its information about a breathalyzer test result and the defendant’s prior OUI convictions. Because the Essay about of the Gangster, defendant lodged no objection to the judge’s preventive or curative efforts at the time of trial, we review this argument under the standard of substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. We review the web mining, case as a whole and ask (1) whether an error occurred; (2) whether it caused prejudice to the defendant; (3) whether the define social capitalism, error materially influenced the verdict; and web mining, (4) whether counsel’s failure to beggars opera, object or to raise a claim of error during trial constituted a reasonable tactical decision. See Commonwealth v. Azar, 435 Mass. Web Mining! 675, 687-688 (2002). In this instance, we find no error in the judge’s management of the issue.

The defendant relies upon the case of Commonwealth v. Importance Of Emotional! Jackson, 376 Mass. 790, 800-801 (1978). The court in that instance set out the following standard operating procedure for instances of discovery of potentially prejudicial publicity during the course of trial. ‘If the judge finds that the material raises a serious question of possible prejudice, a voir dire examination of the web mining, jurors should be conducted. The initial questioning concerning whether any juror saw or heard the potentially prejudicial material may be carried on beggars opera collectively, but if any juror indicates that he or she has seen or heard the material, there must be individual questioning of that juror, outside of the presence of web mining any other juror, to determine the extent of the juror’s exposure to summarise theories, the material and its effects on the juror’s ability to web mining, render an impartial verdict’ (emphasis supplied). The thrust of the defendant’s argument here is define social that the judge had a duty, not an option, to conduct individual voir dire questioning of the jurors. As the governing passage of the Jackson decision makes clear, if no juror has responded affirmatively to the collective question, the judge has no further duty to carry out individual questioning.

Consequently, the judge here complied with the standard of the Jackson rule. In addition, we should observe that, in the absence of any affirmative answers to the collective question, a judge’s continuation into individual interrogation of jurors may adversely stimulate the curiosity of those jurors about potential prejudicial publicity and web mining, cause them to search for it during the course of of emotional a trial. That danger has become all the more serious as a result of the evolution of Internet technology. Both doctrinally and practically the web mining, judge committed no error in these circumstances. 1. Sentencing.

The defendant argues that the beggars opera, judge’s reference to ‘feelings’ about the imposed sentences reveals a violation of the standard of web mining impartiality mandated for sentencing by case law, particularly the case of Commonwealth v. About Evolution! Mills, 436 Mass. 387, 399-402 (2002). Web Mining! That decision emphasizes, ‘A trial judge must be ever vigilant to make certain that his personal and private beliefs do not interfere with his judicial role and importance of emotional, transform it from that of impartial arbiter.’ Id. at 401. The defendant characterizes the web mining, reference to ‘feelings’ as a forbidden indulgence of ‘personal and private beliefs.’ The judge’s fleeting reference here falls far short of the prohibited comments discussed in the Mills case and in any of the decisions cited by the Mills discussion. Evolution Of The! We view the reference to ‘feelings’ in web mining the setting of the judge’s entire remarks about sentencing. In that light, it reflects reasons and not emotion. He commented that he viewed the case as a ‘sad’ one. Since it involved no personal injuries or casualty, his reference to its ‘sad’ character alluded to the fate of the defendant. He observed that she may well have had a hard life.

He observed also that he was ‘sensitive’ to her circumstances. At the Evolution Gangster, same time, he found her behavior over the decade and one-half covered by her four OUI convictions to web mining, constitute a serious threat to public safety. He justifiably viewed her record as ‘egregious.’ She embodied a danger to multiple, the lives of innocent travelers and web mining, pedestrians on and near the roadways. His sentencing scheme removed that peril for multiple personality the period of years imposed for confinement. The sentencing fell within the web mining, bounds of rational discretion. By the beggars opera, Court (McHugh, Sikora #038; Fecteau, JJ.), Entered: January 27, 2011. 1. An additional interpretation of the defendant’s argument is web mining that the judge had a duty to make specific reference to the Lynn Item article in Self-Perception after Employment Essay his collective question to the jury. The Jackson case creates no such duty.

Specific reference would raise the risk of juror research. The judge’s choice created no error of law or abuse of discretion. Mass DUI OUI “Not Public Way” – Observed obviously intoxicated and web mining, urinating in public immediately after driving onto a pier in the Charlestown section of Boston, the defendant, Gregory Belliveau, was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. 76 Mass.App.Ct. 830. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Argued Feb.

3, 2010. Decided June 1, 2010. Sharon Dehmand for the defendant. Nick Kaiser (Kris C. Essay Gangster! Foster, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the Commonwealth. Present: KAFKER, VUONO, #038; SIKORA, JJ. Observed obviously intoxicated and urinating in public immediately after driving onto a pier in the Charlestown section of Boston, the defendant, Gregory Belliveau, was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. (OUI), fifth offense, in violation of G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, ?? 1, 2. On appeal, he argues that the pier on which he was arrested was not a public way under the statute, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that the judge considered improper factors in sentencing the defendant. We affirm. 1. Facts. The jury were warranted in finding the following facts: Pier 4 is located in the Charlestown Navy yard.

The pier is surrounded on all sides by water and accessible by automobile only by way of public streets.1 Those streets end at Terry Ring Way. As described by web mining, a police officer, ?Off of Terry Ring way, there is a short paved area that cars can go down and stop about fifty yards down.? Entry to the pier is then through a swinging gate. Essay Of The Gangster! Next to the gate was a small, somewhat washed-out sign. According to the Commonwealth witnesses, signage to the pier stated that only authorized vehicles were allowed on web mining the pier. Define! The pier was paved and had streetlights.

At about 5:30 p.m. on May 19, 2004, Steven Spinetto, a city of Boston employee, was arriving on the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) commuter ferry to a drop-off location adjacent to web mining, Pier 4.2 While walking from the beggars opera, ferry stop, he noticed a pickup truck pass him by quickly, coming within a few feet of him. This caught his attention because he understood from signage at the pier, his city employment, and his activities at the pier that unauthorized vehicles were not allowed on the pier. The vehicles he had seen on the pier were ?usually the director’s vehicle or vehicles involved with staffing or operations of the sailing center.? A police officer also testified that ?[t]he section that [the] defendant’s car was on would had to have gone across the wooden boards into the section down on the pier; there’s no motor vehicles at web mining, all, it’s a pedestrian pier,? and subsequently added that ?[t]he public can be there, sir, yes. Pedestrians go down there, there’s ships that go off there to shuttle things, but [it's] pedestrian foot traffic-.? Spinetto approached the end of the pier where the truck had stopped, and he observed the defendant standing next to the truck with a Budweiser beer in his hand, publicly urinating. He noticed that the defendant was ?pretty unsteady on beggars opera his feet,? slurring his words, and blurry-eyed, and that he smelled of web mining alcohol. Of Emotional! Spinetto attempted to web mining, dissuade the importance of emotional, defendant from driving, but the web mining, defendant got back into the truck and attempted to leave the scene. With the assistance of another witness, Steven Estes-Smargiassi, Spinetto prevented the defendant from leaving by opening and closing the truck’s doors and by closing the gates to the pier.

Subsequently, Smargiassi called 911, and firefighters arrived and held the summarise, defendant. Shortly thereafter, the national park rangers and Boston police arrived. After examining the truck, in which they found beer, and web mining, talking to the defendant, the beggars opera, police placed the defendant under arrest. 2. Web Mining! Public way. In order to sustain an OUI conviction, the Essay Evolution Gangster and America, Commonwealth must prove that the offense took place ?upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon web mining any way or in any place to beggars opera, which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees.? G.L. Web Mining! c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1). ?Way? is beggars opera further defined by statute to web mining, include ?any public highway, private way laid out theories under authority of statute, way dedicated to public use, or way under the control of park commissioners or body having like powers.? G.L. c. 90, ? 1. This element has been further interpreted by the Supreme Judicial Court to require that the ?public have a right of access by motor vehicle or access as invitees or licensees by motor vehicle.? See Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass.

635, 637, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990), citing Commonwealth v. Endicott, 17 Mass.App.Ct. 1025, 1026, 460 N.E.2d 615 (1984) (Brown J., concurring). Moreover, ?it is the objective appearance of the web mining, way that is determinative of its status, rather than the subjective intent of the theories, property owner.? Commonwealth v. Kiss, 59 Mass.App.Ct. 247, 249-250, 794 N.E.2d 1281 (2003). See Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 545, 549, 672 N.E.2d 16 (1996).

In making that determination, we look to see if the ?physical circumstances of the way are such that members of the public may reasonably conclude that it is open for travel….? Commonwealth v. Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. 235, 238, 525 N.E.2d 1345 (1988). Commonwealth v. Kiss, 59 Mass.App.Ct. at web mining, 250, 794 N.E.2d 1281. ?Some of the usual indicia of accessibility to define capitalism, the public include paving, curbing, traffic signals, street lights, and abutting houses or businesses.? Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. at 549-550, 672 N.E.2d 16. Web Mining! See Commonwealth v. Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct.

179, 182, 905 N.E.2d 114 (2009); Commonwealth v. Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. Summarise Theories Of Attachment! 1008, 1010, 505 N.E.2d 218 (1987) (marked traffic lanes and web mining, hydrants indicia of public accessibility). Indicia that the social capitalism, way is not accessible to the public include signage or barriers prohibiting access. See Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. at 639, 550 N.E.2d 138 (barriers and web mining, sign saying, ?[N]o cars beyond this point?); Commonwealth v. Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct. at 183, 905 N.E.2d 114 (?presence of a gate severely restricting general access to the campground is of great significance?). Employment! Deeds are also relevant considerations.

See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Hazelton, 11 Mass.App.Ct. 899, 900, 413 N.E.2d 1144 (1980). The focal point of the case was whether Pier 4 was a public way. To that end, the Commonwealth introduced evidence that there is an importance of emotional intelligence MBTA ferry stop on the pier, photographs showing indicia of accessibility including a paved passageway and web mining, streetlamps, a deed containing a covenant for the property ?to provide access and egress to the general public foot or vehicle ? (emphasis supplied), testimony that ?[t]here were a variety of importance intelligence people, kids, and other people out on the pier as there are almost every evening,? and testimony regarding the presence on the pier of the Courageous Sailing Center, ?a nonprofit organization that provides sailing opportunities to the youth of Boston,? which apparently was running sailing competitions on the day the web mining, defendant was apprehended. The defendant contends that the pier was not a public way because there was a closed swinging gate leading to the pier and signage indicating access only to summarise theories of attachment, authorized vehicles. The Commonwealth’s own testimony also supported the contention that only limited vehicular access was allowed on the pier, although vehicles were allowed on Terry Ring Way leading to the pier. In sum, the web mining, status of the pier as a public way is a close question. There was ample evidence that the pier was public and a way and theories, paved and lit in a manner suitable for vehicular traffic. The issue, however, was whether public vehicular traffic had been prohibited or restricted.

As the Supreme Judicial Court stated in Commonwealth v. Web Mining! George, 406 Mass. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138, a case in which the beggars opera, defendant was arrested while drinking and driving on a school baseball field, ?our prior cases assume, without discussion, that the term ?access,? as it appears in ? 24, requires inquiry whether the public has access, by a motor vehicle, to a particular way or place? (emphasis original).3 The court in George reversed the web mining, conviction because the drinking and driving occurred on the baseball field, which did not provide vehicular access to the public.4. In the importance, instant case, the presence of a gate and signage are strong indicators that restrictions on public vehicular access were in place. However, the gate blocking vehicular access to the pier was not locked and could be opened by the public, as it was by the defendant. Web Mining! Compare Commonwealth v. Capitalism! Stoddard, 74 Mass.App.Ct. at 180, 905 N.E.2d 114 (gate card access required). Although witnesses described a sign that limited access to authorized vehicles, the sign appearing in the photographs included in the trial exhibits was small and partly washed out. See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. at 236-238, 525 N.E.2d 1345 (public way found despite presence of ?a sign [a little bigger than a standard no parking sign which also adorned the about of the, pole] that read: ?Private Property/Chomerics Employees and Authorized Persons Only? ?). Compare Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. at 550-551, 672 N.E.2d 16 (no public way where a sign listing business hours was ?clearly visible from the road as one approache[d] the entrance? and physical circumstances did not suggest a public way). The deed also expressly provided for vehicular access to the public. The presence of a public water shuttle dock and a sailing center open to web mining, Boston youth also suggested that some parking for the public using those facilities could reasonably be expected nearby, at least in the absence of signage to the contrary.

We need not, however, resolve this close question because it was obvious that the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol not only on beggars opera the pier, but also on the public roads leading to the pier.5 As established by the photographs, maps, and web mining, plans introduced in evidence, as well as supporting testimony, there was no other way to social capitalism, get to web mining, the pier by automobile except by the public roads connecting to the pier. The defendant was also observed driving quickly, close to the entrance of the Essay of the, pier, thereby allowing a reasonable inference that he, and not his passenger, was driving the pickup to the. pier.6 Also it was reasonable to infer that the defendant was intoxicated while he was driving on those public roads before he arrived at the pier. The defendant was observed immediately upon his arrival, smelling of alcohol, blurry-eyed, unsteady on his feet, and having to urinate in public. Web Mining! Proof of operating under the influence on a public way may ?rest entirely on capitalism circumstantial evidence.? Commonwealth v. Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52, 851 N.E.2d 1102 (2006) (citation omitted). See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Wood, 261 Mass. 458, 158 N.E. Multiple Personality Disorder! 834 (1927); Commonwealth v. Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. at 1011, 505 N.E.2d 218. Web Mining! Here there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to provide the necessary proof of all three elements of the offense: the public way, the driving, and the impairment.

Moreover, the judge’s instruction to Gangster and America, the jury in web mining defining a public way was not unnecessarily narrowed to the pier. Rather her detailed instructions on public way appropriately included the following: ?Any street or highway that is Applicant’s Self-Perception open to the public and is controlled and maintained by some level of government is what we call a public way. This includes, for web mining instance, interstate and state highways, as well as municipal streets and roads.? Thus, the instructions on personality cause public way encompassed the web mining, public roads on Self-Perception after Interview which the defendant testified that he drove to arrive at the pier. 3. Remaining issues. We need not belabor the remaining issues. First, trial counsel’s failure to web mining, object to various hearsay statements by a police officer, which duplicated live witness testimony, was obviously harmless. Next, given the testimony regarding how unsteady the defendant was on his feet, we cannot say on this record that trial counsel’s informed and strategic decision to elicit from the defendant that he had sustained a knee injury and beggars opera, that was why he refused to web mining, take a field sobriety test was manifestly unreasonable.7 Regardless, given the overwhelming evidence of his intoxication, it certainly did not ?deprive[ ] the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of define defence.? Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96, 315 N.E.2d 878 (1974). Finally, the defendant’s argument that the judge considered improper factors in importance of emotional intelligence sentencing is without merit.

The defendant contends that Spinetto should not have been given the opportunity to give ?a community impact statement,? speaking about his loss of limb after being run over by a drunk driver over thirty years prior, and making a plea for web mining the judge to keep the defendant from define capitalism injuring other people. Although the judge briefly mentioned Spinetto’s community impact statement in her sentencing remarks, it is clear that the defendant was appropriately sentenced based on his prior record and that the judge considered mitigating circumstances as well.8 Further, the sentence was within the statutory limits. Thus, noting that there was no objection below, we conclude that there was no substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. SIKORA, J. (concurring). I concur fully in the specific rationale of the affirmance: that the evidence and the judge’s proper instructions permitted the jury to find that the web mining, defendant had driven under the influence of alcohol on the public roads leading to the pier. Ante at 835, 927 N.E.2d at 500. That analysis freed us from the need to resolve the ?close question? whether the pier constituted ?any way or … any place to which the of emotional intelligence, public has a right of access, or … any way or … any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees….? G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, ? 1. Web Mining! The ?close question? results from a line of precedent restrictively construing the statutory terms ?way? and ?place.?

As usual, we have avoided possible contradiction of precedent still approved by the Supreme Judicial Court.1 At the same time, I believe that the evidence of this case exposes a deficiency in the current statutory construction and the need for examination of the underlying case law.2. Significant facts. The language of the statute relevant to our concern was last revised in 1961, see St.1961, c. 347, to of attachment, provide the following: ?Whoever, upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle … while. under the web mining, influence of intoxicating liquor … shall be punished….? 3. The opinion of the court describes the location, the access roads, the gate, and signage related to the pier. Ante at beggars opera, 833-835, 927 N.E.2d at 499-501. Four important and independent circumstances of the use of the web mining, pier emerge as well from the evidence. A commuter ferry service conducted by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority delivered passengers to a terminal at the edge of the pier from which they could walk across it.

An instructional sailing club conducted a program for Essay Evolution of the Gangster children from the pier; their parents and friends would observe their. races from it. The pier contained benches on which pedestrian visitors could rest. The members of the public properly on the pier and endangered by the defendant’s driving were pedestrians. Additionally, the evidence permitted the jury to make the web mining, following findings about the defendant’s conduct. He drove his pickup truck at a high speed onto the pier; got out and social, urinated onto web mining one of the benches; reentered the truck and backed into another bench; and then backed up further so as to collide with a storage shed used by the sailing club. The truck suffered substantial damage; the defendant got out again and walked away from it. Major case law. A sensible and direct application of the words of the statute to the circumstances of the pier and of emotional intelligence, the actions of the defendant would appear to make him punishable. However, the interpretative overlay of the following cases has required that the ?way? or ?place? in question be one of public ?access? by ?motor vehicle.?

Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. 635, 638, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990). That construction forces us, somewhat anomalously, to affirm the conviction of the defendant, not on the basis of his extraordinary conduct on the pier, but rather on the basis of his inferable driving down separate roadways. The original act punished simply operation under the influence ?on any public way or private way laid out under authority of web mining law.? St.1906, c. 412, ? 4. It made no reference to operation in beggars opera a ?place.? Early decisions dealing with operation on a ?way? stated that ?[t]he statute was passed for the protection of web mining travellers on highways,? and therefore presumably persons in motor vehicles. See Commonwealth v. Clarke, 254 Mass. 566, 567-568, 150 N.E.

829 (1926) (movement of car for several feet by social capitalism, mere shifting of gear and web mining, without engagement of the engine by the driver amounted to operation; the importance intelligence, statute ?was passed for the protection of travellers upon highways?); Commonwealth v. Clancy, 261 Mass. Web Mining! 345, 348, 158 N.E. 758 (1927) (the statute ?was intended to regulate the use of motor vehicles upon define social ways?). In 1928, the Legislature rewrote the entire provision. Its opening main clause now declared, ?Whoever upon any way, or in any place to which the public has a right of access, operates a motor vehicle … while under the influence of intoxicating liquor … shall be punished …? (emphasis supplied). G.L. Web Mining! c. 90, ? 24, as appearing in multiple St.1928, c. 281. Thus the notion of statutory protection for highway travelers or motorists took hold in the version of the act predating any reference to operation in a ?place.? Subsequent decisions seem never to have caught up with the web mining, 1928 addition of the concept of a ?place? as the site of operating under the influence. Despite the added term, the court in Commonwealth v. Paccia, 338 Mass. 4, 6, 153 N.E.2d 664 (1958), concluded that operation under the influence on a private way connecting two public ways was not operation upon the requisite ?place to which the public ha[d] a right of access? because no general public easement existed over it, even though the owner of the private way had permitted use of beggars opera it by members of the public as business invitees or business licensees to a nearby restaurant and web mining, a market building. The court reasoned that the canon of strict construction of penal statutes required an explicit legislative statement expanding the place of public access to private sites receiving members of the public as business invitees or licensees.

Ibid. Three years later the after Undergoing Employment, Legislature responded with the additional words ?as invitees or licensees.? St.1961, c. Web Mining! 347. Define! In one subsequent case, Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. 169, 172, 474 N.E.2d 1106 (1985) (an appeal hinging on the meaning of ?under the influence?), the court in dicta repeated the language of the web mining, 1926 Clarke case (the purpose of the statute was ?the protection of travellers upon highways?).

In another it determined that the defendant’s operation of his pickup truck on a privately owned parcel of land onto which persons would drive various recreational vehicles such as ?go carts? without the owner’s permission did not involve a ?place to which the members of the public [have] access as invitees or licensees? because the owner had never consented to such entry. Commonwealth v. Callahan, 405 Mass. 200, 202-205, 539 N.E.2d 533 (1989). Essay About Evolution Of The! The court acknowledged that the 1961 amendment had ?extend[ed] the reach? of the act, id. at 203, 539 N.E.2d 533, but added that the canon of strict construction of penal legislation against the Commonwealth applied to its terms. Id. at 205, 539 N.E.2d 533. ?There is reason to believe that [the 1961 amendment references to web mining, invitees and licensees sought] to address the problem of accidents in places ?such as public parking lots or chain store parking lots.? ? Ibid. In its last assessment of this portion of the act in 1990, the court held that the center field area of a public school baseball field did not qualify as a public way or place to which the Essay about, public had access by motor vehicle as of right or as invitees or licensees because both physical barriers and web mining, ?no trespassing? signs blocked entry onto the field.

Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. at 639-640, 550 N.E.2d 138. Summarise Of Attachment! The court noted that its prior decisions had assumed ?without discussion? that the statutory term ?access? meant access to a particular way or place by motor vehicle. Id. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138. 4. The issue.

None of the cases appears to have addressed the applicability of the web mining, statute to places to which members of the beggars opera, public have access as pedestrian invitees or licensees. Web Mining! For the importance intelligence, following reasons, a continuation of the unexamined assumption that the web mining, term ?access? in importance of emotional the impaired driver statute means only public access by a motor vehicle seems to me unwarranted by its language and contradicted by its safety purpose. The precise language of the act is the first source of insight into its meaning and legislative intent. See, e.g., Hoffman v. Web Mining! Howmedica, Inc., 373 Mass. 32, 37, 364 N.E.2d 1215 (1977); Commissioner of Correction v. Superior Court Dept. of the Trial Court, 446 Mass. Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview Essay! 123, 124, 842 N.E.2d 926 (2006). Web Mining! The language extends to define social, impaired operation ?upon any way or in any place? accessible to members of the public as invitees or licensees. The repeated use of the web mining, article ?any? with no limiting adjectives or phrases attached to the words ?right of access? and ?invitees and licensees? denotes the generality of the of emotional intelligence, intended ?place.? The Legislature did not confine the web mining, roles of theories of attachment invitees or licensees to persons conveyed by motor vehicles. Web Mining! It.

chose the additional words in 1961 as a specific answer to the narrow interpretation and the invitation of Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Employment Interview additional language by the then recent Paccia decision, 338 Mass. at 6, 153 N.E.2d 664. In 1928 it had previously broadened coverage of the act from a ?way? to a ?way? and web mining, a ?place.? Its revisions of the statute have progressively expanded its range. On three occasions the Essay of the Gangster and America, courts have pointed out that the act’s penal character requires strict interpretation. See Commonwealth v. Paccia, 338 Mass. at 6, 153 N.E.2d 664 (rejecting ?exten[sion] merely by web mining, implication?); Commonwealth v. Define Social! Connolly, 394 Mass. at 174, 474 N.E.2d 1106 (?[w]e must resolve in favor of criminal defendants any reasonable doubt as to the statute’s meaning?); Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Callahan, 405 Mass. at 205, 539 N.E.2d 533 (?criminal statutes must be construed strictly against the Commonwealth?). If the act presented an identifiable ambiguity, that familiar maxim would be far more applicable. However, as the latest reference in the George case, 406 Mass. at 638, 550 N.E.2d 138, points out, the critical assumption of the law’s limitation to members of the public as motorists and not as pedestrians has proceeded ?without discussion? of summarise theories of attachment any ambiguity. Web Mining! The rule of of attachment lenity gives the web mining, defendant the benefit of a plausible ambiguity. It ?does not mean that an available and sensible interpretation is to be rejected in favor of a fanciful or perverse one.? Commonwealth v. Roucoulet, 413 Mass.

647, 652, 601 N.E.2d 470 (1992), quoting from Commonwealth v. Tata, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 23, 25-26, 545 N.E.2d 1179 (1989) (Kaplan, J.). In these circumstances several other canons of interpretation deserve consideration and application in social capitalism a discussion of the scope of the act. One is that each substantive word of web mining a statute has separate meaning. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Millican, 449 Mass. 298, 300-301, 867 N.E.2d 725 (2007) (construing the felony vehicular homicide statute, G.L. c. 90, ? 24G [ a ], against the defendant’s contention of redundant language); Commonwealth v. Shea, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 196, 197, 704 N.E.2d 518 (1999). Thus the Legislature’s addition of the word ?place? in 1928 meant something more than a ?way.? Both the importance of emotional intelligence, statutory definition of ?way,?

G.L. c. 90, ? 1, supra at note 4, and web mining, the general ordinary meaning depict an artery supporting some degree of traffic or movement. By contrast, a ?place? denotes a far more generic location unrestricted to the conveyance of traffic. Personality Disorder Cause! If a statute does not define a term, we may interpret it ?in accordance with its generally accepted plain meaning.? Commonwealth v. Boucher, 438 Mass. 274, 276, 780 N.E.2d 47 (2002), and cases cited. The 1928 addition of the web mining, term ?place? by the Legislature expanded the diameter of the statute beyond the focus of the early decisions on protection of highway travellers. Other standards of Interview Essay interpretation forbid courts to add language to the terms chosen by the Legislature. Commonwealth v. McLeod, 437 Mass. 286, 294, 771 N.E.2d 142 (2002) (a court must ?not add words to web mining, a statute that the theories, Legislature did not put there, either by web mining, inadvertent omission or by design?). See 1010 Memorial Drive Tenants Corp. v. Importance! Fire Chief of web mining Cambridge, 424 Mass.

661, 668, 677 N.E.2d 219 (1997) (Greaney, J., dissenting) (same). Here the current interpretation effectively adds the phrase ?by motor vehicle? to summarise theories of attachment, the Legislature’s words ?any place to which the public has a right of access, … or … any place to web mining, which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees.? That narrowing addition undercuts the beggars opera, legislative trend to broaden the coverage of the act. Finally, courts will not adopt a construction or application producing an absurd or ineffectual result. See Insurance Rating Bd. v. Commissioner of Ins., 356 Mass. 184, 189, 248 N.E.2d 500 (1969); Commonwealth v. Millican, 449 Mass. at 303-304, 867 N.E.2d 725. The application of the impaired driver statute for web mining the protection of members of the public as motorists but not as pedestrians produces at least an irrational result. It paradoxically exempts from criminal responsibility operators so impaired that they do not know or care enough to keep their vehicles on usual roadways. Summarise Theories Of Attachment! It excludes from the protection of the statute members of the public least expecting, and most vulnerable to, irresponsible driving precisely because they are located off the usual ways of motor traffic. Members of the public engaged in rest or recreation in such places as parks, picnic areas, beaches, restaurant patios, or recreational piers of the web mining, kind presented in this case would be located in places of insufficient public access for protection against beggars opera, impaired drivers because they entered them on web mining foot.

That interpretation opens a substantial gap in Self-Perception Undergoing Employment Interview the coverage of the act. It shifts the application of the law from the irresponsible conduct of the impaired driver to web mining, the fortuitous location and status of his endangered or injured victim. Solutions. A ?place? is a location other than a ?way,? and a ?member of the public? can be a person other than a motorist. The decisions have fallen behind the statute. The principle of stare decisis should not denature into a pattern of errare decisis. Several processes are available to break the momentum of error. Within the executive branch and theories, most immediately, a typical prosecution could include evidence, argument, and instruction upon the operator’s use of public roads adjoining the place in which the impaired driving injured or endangered pedestrians, as occurred here. Web Mining! Within the judiciary the Supreme Judicial Court could reconsider the summarise of attachment, present construction said by web mining, the court in George to have evolved without discussion.

Finally, and perhaps ideally, the Legislature could further amend the statute to extend its reach unmistakably to beggars opera, ?any place in which the public has a right of access, or … any place to which members of the web mining, public have access as invitees or licensees as motorists or as pedestrians ? (emphasized words supplied). 1. Photographs of the pier, maps, and plans were introduced in evidence, as well as detailed testimony explaining the exhibits. 2. The defendant testified that after leaving work at 4:00 p.m., he drove to Charlestown, picked up a friend, and continued to drive to the Charlestown Pier. He then drove in traffic on public streets leading to the Navy Yard and Pier 4. As he approached the Essay Evolution Gangster, pier, he had to ?race up and pass? one car. He then drove up Terry Ring Way to a closed double swinging gate. Web Mining! As the defendant moved for a required finding of not guilty at the close of the Commonwealth’s case on the public way question, we do not consider the defendant’s testimony in summarise determining whether that motion should have been allowed. 3. Web Mining! In Commonwealth v. George, ?the parties [had also] agreed and the jurors were instructed that the baseball field was not, as a matter of law, a public way.?

Id. at 636, 550 N.E.2d 138. 4. The evidence in Self-Perception after Employment Essay Commonwealth v. George, supra at 637-638, 550 N.E.2d 138, indicated that the web mining, defendant consumed alcohol on the field and overturned the car while trying to leave the define social capitalism, field. Web Mining! In the define social, instant case, in contrast, the evidence and the reasonable inferences that could be drawn therefrom indicated that the web mining, defendant was driving under the influence on public roads prior to his arrival at the pier. 5. We recognize that the Commonwealth ignored this obvious alternative in arguing its case to theories, the jury. Nonetheless, as explained below, the judge’s instructions and the proof offered adequately presented the issue for the jury’s consideration. 6. The passenger left the car soon after they were confronted at the pier. 7. The Commonwealth chose not to web mining, inquire about the beggars opera, field sobriety test on cross-examination.

8. The judge explained that ?having weighed the statutory language, having weighed the facts of the offense, and this defendant’s prior record, having considered the web mining, mitigating information and the letters submitted by his wife, his mother, and his sister, having paid heed to the recommendations of the prosecutor in the case and the recommendations of the defense attorney, I believe that this is an appropriate sentence taking into consideration all of those factors.? 1. From its inception the Appeals Court has renounced any authority to alter, overrule, or decline to follow governing precedents of the Supreme Judicial Court. Burke v. Toothaker, 1 Mass.App.Ct. 234, 239, 295 N.E.2d 184 (1973). Commonwealth v. Summarise Of Attachment! Healy, 26 Mass.App.Ct. 990, 991, 529 N.E.2d 1357 (1988). Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Dube, 59 Mass.App.Ct. 476, 485-486, 796 N.E.2d 859 (2003), and cases cited.

That limitation, however, does not bar the beggars opera, court from useful observations in dicta about the continuing viability of precedent challenged by the facts or arguments of specific cases within its jurisdiction. See, e.g., Holmes Realty Trust v. Granite City Storage Co., 25 Mass.App.Ct. Web Mining! 272, 277-278 #038; n. Summarise Of Attachment! 2, 517 N.E.2d 502 (1988), questioning the then existing rule imposing a duty to pay rent upon a nonresidential tenant independently of the landlord’s breach of covenants in the lease; and web mining, the subsequent decision of the Supreme Judicial Court overruling that doctrine, Wesson v. Leone Enterprises, Inc., 437 Mass. Define Social! 708, 709, 774 N.E.2d 611 (2002). Other observations may recommend the extension or the web mining, insertion of standards or rules to cure chronic problems revealed by multiple cases. Social! See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Web Mining! DiGiambattista, 59 Mass.App.Ct.

190, 196 n. Intelligence! 4, 794 N.E.2d 1229 (2003), suggesting the utility of videotaping or audiotaping admissions or confessions resulting from police interrogation, and web mining, the subsequent adoption of that view by the Supreme Judicial Court, S.C., 442 Mass. 423, 440-449, 813 N.E.2d 516 (2004). 2. As discussed below, the Supreme Judicial Court, in its last treatment of the issue twenty years ago, observed that the restrictive interpretation had evolved ?without discussion.? Commonwealth v. George, 406 Mass. 635, 638, 550 N.E.2d 138 (1990). 3. In parts immaterial, this sentence was also amended in 1994, see G.L. c. 90, ? 24(1)( a )(1), as appearing in St.1994, c. Beggars Opera! 25, ? 3, and by St.2003, c. 28, ? 1. 4. In decisions addressing the meaning of web mining a ?way? in ? 24(1)(a ) (1), the Appeals Court has consulted the definition of that term by G.L. c. 90, ? 1: ?any public highway, private way laid out under authority of statute, way dedicated to public use, or way under the importance, control of park commissioners or body having like powers.? Beyond that source, as this case illustrates, ante at web mining, 832-833, 927 N.E.2d at 498-99, we have examined the site where the suspect was driving under ?the usual indicia of accessibility to the public [such as] paving, curbing, traffic signals, street lights, and abutting houses or businesses.?

Ante at 833, 927 N.E.2d at Essay about Evolution and America, 499, quoting from web mining Commonwealth v. Smithson, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 545, 549-550, 672 N.E.2d 16 (1996). Our most extensive discussion of the locus required for beggars opera conviction of operating under the influence under ? 24(1)( a )(1) dealt with a way on both sides of which were business abutters and which was indisputably open for travel by motor vehicles. Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Hart, 26 Mass.App.Ct. at 237-238, 525 N.E.2d 1345. Motor Vehicle, Operating under the influence, Operation. Practice, Criminal, Required finding, Instructions to jury, Argument by define, prosecutor, Defendant’s decision not to web mining, testify, Assistance of summarise counsel, Jury and jurors, Prior conviction, Speedy trial. Robert S. McGILLIVARY. Appeals Court of Massachusetts. September 13, 2010. January 25, 2011. NOTICE: The slip opinions and orders posted on this Web site are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and web mining, bound volumes of the Official Reports.

This preliminary material will be removed from the Web site once the advance sheets of the social capitalism, Official Reports are published. Motor Vehicle, Operating under the web mining, influence, Operation. Practice, Criminal, Required finding, Instructions to jury, Argument by prosecutor, Defendant’s decision not to testify, Assistance of counsel, Jury and jurors, Prior conviction, Speedy trial. INDICTMENT found and returned in the Superior Court Department on January 26, 2005. The case was tried before Howard J. Whitehead, J. James P. McKenna for the defendant. Ronald DeRosa, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

Present: McHugh, Katzmann, #038; Vuono, JJ. The defendant Robert McGillivary appeals from a conviction by a Superior Court jury of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of personality disorder cause intoxicating liquor (OUI), fourth offense, in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1). 1 His principal issue focuses on web mining the meaning of “operation” under that statute. We affirm. 1. Operation of the motor vehicle. A. Operation as matter of law.

At trial, the Commonwealth pursued only one theory: that the about Evolution Gangster, defendant, who was under the influence of intoxicating liquor and was found slumped over the wheel, operated a motor vehicle by putting the web mining, keys in the ignition and turning the electricity on, but not turning the engine on. There was no evidence from which the jury could infer that the defendant drove his car drunk before getting behind the wheel. Contrast Commonwealth v. Colby, 23 Mass.App.Ct. 1008, 1011 (1987). The defendant argues that the Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview Essay, evidence of operation was insufficient as matter of law because putting a key into the ignition and turning it does not constitute operation when the web mining, engine has not been engaged.

2 The issue whether a defendant who places the key in the ignition and turns the summarise theories, electricity on without starting the engine may be found to be “operating” the vehicle for purposes of G.L. c. Web Mining! 90, § 24, is one of first impression in Massachusetts. 3. To define “operation” we must look to the touchstone case of Commonwealth v. Uski, 263 Mass. 22, 24 (1928), which held that “[a] person operates a motor vehicle within the meaning of G.L. c. 90, § 24, when, in the vehicle, he intentionally does any act or makes use of any mechanical or electrical agency which alone or in sequence will set in motion the motive power of that vehicle.” 4 See also Commonwealth v. Merry, 453 Mass. 653, 661 (2009) (reaffirming Uski definition of operation).

Under the Uski definition, turning the key in the ignition to the “on” setting could be found to be part of a sequence that would set the capitalism, vehicle’s engine in motion and that would, thus, constitute operation. Web Mining! 5. Our conclusion is informed by the public policy underlying the Massachusetts OUI statute. The purpose of G.L. c. 90, § 24, is to “protect[] the public from summarise theories intoxicated drivers,” Commonwealth v. Ginnetti, 400 Mass. 181, 184 (1987), by “deter[ring] individuals who have been drinking intoxicating liquor from getting into their vehicles, except as passengers.” Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct. 317, 300-321 (1994), quoting from web mining State v. Ghylin, 250 N.W.2d 252, 255 (N.D.1977). Cf.

State v. Haight, 279 Conn. 546, 554-555 (2006), quoting from State v. Gill, 70 Ohio St.3d 150, 153-154 (1994) (“[a] clear purpose of the [Ohio OUI statute] is to discourage persons from multiple disorder cause putting themselves in the position in which they can potentially cause the web mining, movement of a motor vehicle while intoxicated…”). Even an intoxicated person who is sleeping behind the wheel is dangerous because “that person may awaken and decide to drive while still under the influence.” State v. Kelton, 168 Vt. 629, 630 (1998). Summarise Theories Of Attachment! 6. In sum, applying the Uski definition to the facts before us, we conclude that, as matter of law, the evidence that the defendant, who was found in the passenger’s seat, turned the ignition key–an act which the jury could have found to be the first step in a sequence to set in motion the motive power of the web mining, vehicle–was sufficient to permit the jury to conclude that he “operated” the motor vehicle.

See also State v. Haight, 279 Conn. at 551-555 (holding that inserting a key into Essay Evolution of the and America the ignition constitutes operation under a definition of operation similar to web mining, the Uski definition because this is an Applicant’s Self-Perception after Undergoing Employment act that is part of web mining a sequence that will “set in motion the motive power of the vehicle”) (citation omitted). 7, 8. We are unpersuaded by the defendant’s interpretation of Commonwealth v. Ginnetti, 400 Mass. at 184, as requiring that an engine be engaged and as meaning that turning the key to Self-Perception, the “on” position could not constitute operation. Specifically, the defendant argues that turning the key in the ignition to a position that does not start the car would only draw power from the battery and thus neither starts the engine nor makes use of the power provided by its engine. Web Mining! Even if we assume, arguendo, that the defendant is correct and that turning the key to the “on” position does not engage the engine, 9 the defendant misconstrues Ginnetti. In Ginnetti, supra at 183-184, the court was faced with the question whether a vehicle with a functioning engine was rendered inoperable within the Applicant’s Self-Perception after Interview, meaning of G.L. c. 90, § 24, “merely because it is immovable due to road or other conditions not involving the web mining, vehicle itself.” Id. at social, 184. Applying the Uski definition to the facts before it, the court concluded that “the defendant… operate[d] a motor vehicle by starting its engine or by making use of the web mining, power provided by its engine.” Id. at beggars opera, 183-184. In so holding, the web mining, court did not state that operation was conditioned on an engine being engaged, or that Uski so ruled. Finally, we reject the defendant’s argument that the jury instructions were inappropriate. The judge’s instructions to the jury, 10 to which defense counsel did not object at Essay about Gangster, trial, did not create a substantial risk of miscarriage of justice. Contrary to web mining, the defendant’s claim, the instructions did not leave jurors with the impression that evidence that the defendant was sleeping in the driver’s seat with a key turned in the ignition compelled a finding of operation.

Contrast Commonwealth v. Plowman, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 234 (1990). 11. B. Sufficiency of the evidence. The defendant, who does not challenge being under the about Evolution of the Gangster, influence of intoxicating liquor 12 or the fact that the vehicle was on a public way, 13 argues on appeal that the Commonwealth failed to present sufficient evidence that he “operate[d] a motor vehicle.” See G.L. Web Mining! c. Capitalism! 90, § 24(1)(a)(1). More specifically, he contends that as a factual matter, the Commonwealth failed to web mining, prove that he put the key in the ignition of the importance of emotional, car and turned the key. We consider “whether the web mining, evidence, in its light most favorable to the Commonwealth, notwithstanding the contrary evidence presented by the defendant, is sufficient… to permit the jury to infer the existence of the essential elements of the crime charged…” beyond a reasonable doubt. Disorder Cause! Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979) (citation omitted). The evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth shows that the defendant was found asleep in web mining the driver’s seat “slumped over the wheel of the van holding a roast beef sandwich in his hands, with sauce dripping down his hand.” The defendant’s feet were “right in front of him.” The vehicle’s dashboard was illuminated.

The key was in the ignition and had been turned to the “on” position so that the “energy to the vehicle was on,” but the Essay Evolution of the Gangster, engine itself was off and “[t]he vehicle was not running.” The police officer had to “physically turn the ignition back” in web mining order to remove the summarise theories of attachment, key. The police did not observe anyone else in the van at the time of arrest. Viewed as a whole, the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the defendant, while sitting in the driver’s seat of the vehicle, put a key in the ignition and turned it to the “on” position. See Commonwealth v. Cabral, 77 Mass.App.Ct. 909, 909 (2010) (“Circumstantial evidence may be exclusive evidence of operation of a motor vehicle, a required element of OUI”), citing Commonwealth v. Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52 (2006), and Commonwealth v. Rand, 363 Mass. 554, 562 (1973). The defendant points to two pieces of evidence that he argues conflict with a finding that he operated a motor vehicle. First, the defendant cites testimony by web mining, the defendant and the arresting officer that the defendant, upon being awakened by the police officer, told the officer that the officer did not have the vehicle’s keys. The defendant testified that, after he moved to the driver’s seat and began eating his food, he did not remember what happened until the personality, police officer woke him up.

The jury, however, could have found that the defendant simply did not remember placing the key in the ignition, or they may have determined that he was not being truthful in denying putting the web mining, key in the ignition. Moreover, the existence of contradictory evidence does not require a finding of Undergoing Interview not guilty. See Commonwealth v. Pike, 430 Mass. 317, 323-324 (1999). Second, the defendant points to the testimony of his friend that the friend left the defendant passed out in web mining the passenger seat and Applicant’s after Undergoing Employment Essay, threw the keys on the passenger side floor when he left the vehicle. 14 Even if the jury credited this testimony, it does not require a finding of not guilty because the web mining, jury could reasonably have inferred that the defendant, who admitted moving from the passenger seat into the driver’s seat, picked up the key and put it in the ignition when he moved to the driver’s seat. 2. Other issues. A. Though he did not object below, the defendant argues that the Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview Essay, prosecutor misstated the web mining, evidence during his closing argument, creating a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice requiring reversal. Multiple Personality Cause! We disagree.

The prosecutor’s argument disputing the defendant’s characterization that he was victim of web mining a conspiracy by define social, the police officers was an appropriate response to defense counsel’s argument that implied such a conspiracy. Web Mining! See Commonwealth v. Duguay, 430 Mass. 397, 404 (1999). We also conclude that the prosecutor’s statement that the defense witness’s testimony corroborated the officers’ testimony was a fair representation of the multiple disorder cause, evidence. B. The defendant argues that his right to testify was “improperly muzzled” at trial because he was not permitted to testify that he intended to sleep overnight in the van so that he could go to court in Gloucester the next day.

The defendant, however, was permitted to elicit testimony from the defendant’s friend that the defendant said he had to work early in the morning and planned to sleep in the van overnight. Furthermore, the record supports the web mining, conclusion that the defendant accepted his attorney’s strategic advice not to testify during his examination about his plans to sleep in the van because such testimony might open the door to evidence of prior convictions of driving under the influence. Applicant’s After Employment! See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Finstein, 426 Mass. 200, 203-204 (1997). C. Prior to trial, the defendant moved to replace his attorney, and the judge denied the motion.

The record reflects that as soon as the judge became aware of a conflict between the defendant and his counsel, the Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview Essay, defendant was provided an opportunity to explain his reasons for web mining wanting to Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Essay, remove his attorney. Web Mining! The judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the defendant’s motion where (1) this trial counsel was the defendant’s third attorney; (2) the case was two years old; (3) although the defendant was upset with his attorney for arguing a motion for a new trial on his behalf, but without the defendant’s presence, the define social, defendant’s presence would not have affected the outcome of that motion for a new trial; and (4) the defendant merely complained of something that any lawyer who represented him “who had any competence at all would do.” See Commonwealth v. Tuitt, 393 Mass. 801, 804 (1985). D. The defendant argues that the judge abused his discretion by refusing to remove two jurors for cause. We disagree. With respect to each of the web mining, complained-of jurors, the judge dispelled any concerns about the juror’s bias through follow-up questioning, in which the jurors said they would consider all the evidence to determine whether a police officer was telling the truth in the event that the officer’s testimony was challenged.

A trial judge is afforded “a large degree of discretion” in importance of emotional the jury selection process. Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Seabrooks, 433 Mass. 439, 442-443 (2001), quoting from Commonwealth v. Vann Long, 419 Mass. 798, 808 (1995). “Where, as here, a judge has explored the grounds for any possible claim that a juror cannot be impartial, and has determined that a juror stands indifferent, [the court] will not conclude that the judge abused his discretion by theories, empanelling the web mining, juror unless juror prejudice is manifest.” Commonwealth v. Seabrooks, supra at 443. No such prejudice was manifest here. E. The defendant challenges the disorder cause, sufficiency of the evidence of prior convictions presented at the subsequent offense portion of his trial. Web Mining! Reviewing the issue under the familiar standard of Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. at 676-678, we conclude that the defendant’s contention is without merit.

First, there was ample evidence that the defendant was the person who had been convicted of capitalism similar offenses once in web mining 1986 and summarise of attachment, twice in web mining 1988. See Commonwealth v. Bowden, 447 Mass. 593, 602 (2006) (“[registry of motor vehicles] records, which contained more particularized identifying information…, also reflected the offenses and the fact that they were the defendant’s”). See also Commonwealth v. Beggars Opera! Maldonado, 55 Mass.App.Ct. 450, 458-460 (2002), S. C., 439 Mass. 460 (2003); Commonwealth v. Olivo, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 368, 372 (2003).

Second, otherwise admissible certified records of web mining convictions or docket sheets are nontestimonial and admissible under the confrontation clause. Commonwealth v. Weeks, 77 Mass.App.Ct. 1, 5 (2010). Finally, the judge’s instructions to the jury with regard to the prior convictions were proper where the judge simply instructed the jury that the documents in question were OUI convictions and reminded the jury that the Commonwealth still had the burden to prove that the defendant was the person who had committed these previous offenses. F. There is no merit to of attachment, the defendant’s contention that he was denied his right to speedy trial. Pursuant to Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(1)(C), 378 Mass.

910 (1979), “a criminal defendant who is not brought to trial within one year of the web mining, return day in the court in which the case is awaiting trial is presumptively entitled to dismissal of the charges unless the Commonwealth justifies the delay.” Commonwealth v. Montgomery, 76 Mass.App.Ct. 500, 502 (2010). The return day here was March 8, 2005. About And America! The defendant’s trial began on January 23, 2007, 686 days later. “The delay may be excused by a showing that it falls within one of the ‘[e]xcluded [p]eriods’ provided in rule 36(b)(2), or by a showing that the defendant acquiesced in, was responsible for, or benefited from the delay.” Commonwealth v. Spaulding, 411 Mass. 503, 504 (1992). Of the 686 days between those two dates, the web mining, docket sheet and documents filed in support or opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss show that many days are excluded from the of emotional intelligence, calculation. Web Mining! Due to jointly agreed upon continuances by the parties, at least 117 days are excluded. 15 See Barry v. Commonwealth, 390 Mass. Theories! 285, 298 (1983).

There were 185 days when the defendant was unavailable while on trial on another charge that are also excluded. Web Mining! 16 See Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(2)(A)(iii), 378 Mass. 910 (1979). Of Attachment! Finally, the defendant’s motion to dismiss, which was filed on December 13, 2006, and decided on January 10, 2007, also tolled the running of the web mining, rule 36 time for twenty-nine days. See Commonwealth v. Spaulding, 411 Mass. at define social capitalism, 505 n. 4. In total there were at least 17 331 days that were excluded from the web mining, 686 days between arraignment and trial, meaning that fewer than 365 days remain to Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview, count against the Commonwealth. Therefore, the defendant was tried within the time constraints of rule 36(b), and the order denying the motion to dismiss is affirmed. Web Mining! 18. 1. General Laws c. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, §§ 1, 2, provides in relevant part: “Whoever, upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle with a percentage, by weight, of importance of emotional intelligence alcohol in their blood of web mining eight one-hundredths or greater, or while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, or of marijuana, narcotic drugs, depressants or stimulant substances, all as defined in section one of chapter ninety-four C, or the Essay about of the Gangster and America, vapors of glue shall be punished…. “If the defendant has been previously convicted or assigned to an alcohol or controlled substance education, treatment, or rehabilitation program… because of a like offense three times preceding the date of the commission of the web mining, offense for which he has been convicted, the defendant shall be punished by a fine of not less than [$1,500] nor more than [$25,000] and by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years….” 2. Quite correctly, the defendant does not dispute that operation can occur even when the vehicle is “standing still.” Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct.

317, 320 (1994), quoting from Commonwealth v. Clarke, 254 Mass. 566, 568 (1926). 3. Beggars Opera! If the evidence shows that a defendant was seated in web mining the driver’s seat with the engine running or while it was still warm, it is well established that a jury may draw the capitalism, reasonable inference that he operated his vehicle within the meaning of the statute. See Commonwealth v. Eckert, 431 Mass. 591, 599-600 (2000) (testimony of police officer, if credited, that he heard engine running would provide sufficient evidence of operation); Commonwealth v. Sudderth, supra (sufficient evidence of operation where police found defendant “seated in the driver’s seat with the engine running and web mining, a key in the ignition”); Commonwealth v. Petersen, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 49, 52 (2006) (proof of operation where engine still warm). Cf. Commonwealth v. Plowman, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 230, 233-234 (1990) (intoxicated driver discovered behind wheel of car with engine running and keys in ignition does not necessarily mandate a finding of operation).

4. In Commonwealth v. Uski, 263 Mass. at 23-24, there was conflicting testimony about whether the defendant turned on the motor or simply placed the key in the ignition. 5. Capitalism! See also Commonwealth v. Sudderth, 37 Mass.App.Ct. at 320 (“The defendant’s intention after occupying the web mining, driver’s seat is disorder not an web mining element of the statutory crime”). 6. See also State v. Beggars Opera! Ghylin, 250 N.W.2d 252, 255 (N.D.1977), quoting from Hughes v. State, 535 P.2d 1023, 1024 (Okla.Crim.App.1975) (“We believe that an web mining intoxicated person seated behind the steering wheel of a motor vehicle is a threat to the safety and welfare of the public. Self-Perception Employment! The danger is less than where an intoxicated person is actually driving a vehicle, but it does exist. The defendant when arrested may have been exercising no conscious violation with regard to the vehicle, still there is a legitimate inference to be drawn that he placed himself behind the wheel of the vehicle and could have at any time started the automobile and driven away”). 7. Cf. Stevenson v. Falls Church, 243 Va. 434, 438 (1992) (applying a definition of operation similar to the Uski definition in holding that the defendant did not operate the vehicle “[b]ecause the web mining, presence of the key in the ignition switch in the off position did not engage the mechanical or electrical equipment” of the vehicle); Propst v. Commonwealth, 24 Va.App.

791, 794 (1997) (holding that the Stevenson v. Falls Church case stands for the proposition that the position of the key in the ignition is Essay Evolution a factor that a trial court should consider but does not create a bright line rule). 8. We do not decide whether any or all of the following could be found to be operation under G.L. c. 90, § 24: inserting a key in the ignition without turning it and without engaging the motor or the vehicle’s power; using an electronic remote starting device to web mining, start the importance intelligence, engine of the car without inserting a key in web mining the ignition, where putting a key in the ignition would be required to multiple personality disorder cause, actually drive the car; or putting the key in the ignition to engage either the web mining, electricity or the motor before going to sleep in a seat other than the driver’s seat. 9. In the absence of any evidence below regarding whether the key, when turned in multiple personality the ignition to the on position, engages the engine, we reach no conclusion on web mining that mechanical issue. 10. The relevant portion of the jury instructions is the following: “The first element which the Commonwealth must prove is that the defendant operates a motor vehicle. The expression ‘operation of Undergoing Employment Interview a motor vehicle’ covers not only all the well known and easily recognize[d] things that drivers do, as they travel on a street or highway, but also any act which would tend to set the web mining, vehicle in motion. To operate a motor vehicle, it is not necessary that the engine be running.

The intentional as opposed to accidental manipulation of any mechanical part of the vehicle, or the use of any electrical agency which alone or in sequence will set in social capitalism motion the mode of power of the vehicle is sufficient in web mining law to constitute operation. A person operates a motor vehicle, within the meaning of the law, when, in the vehicle, he intentionally does any act or makes use of any mechanical or electrical agency, which alone or in sequence, meaning taken together with other acts, will set in motion the Undergoing Employment Essay, motive power of the web mining, vehicle. The Commonwealth need not prove the defendant’s intention after occupying the driver’s seat.” 11. We also reject the defendant’s argument that “a stopped engine instruction” was required because the engine was stopped, and the stop was not incidental to the operation of the vehicle.

See Commonwealth v. Cavallaro, 25 Mass.App.Ct. 605, 609 (1988), quoting from Commonwealth v. Henry, 229 Mass. 19, 22 (1918) (operation under G.L. Importance Of Emotional Intelligence! c. 90, § 24, includes “at least ordinary stops upon the highway, and such stops are to be regarded as fairly incidental to its operation”). Such an instruction was inappropriate here where the Commonwealth’s theory was that the defendant was operating the vehicle by putting the key in the ignition and turning it. This theory did not depend on any previous operation of the vehicle. 12. The defendant admitted at trial that he had consumed at least ten White Russian drinks that evening and was “highly intoxicated.” Furthermore, the web mining, arresting officer reported that the defendant smelled very strongly of of emotional alcohol, had slurred speech, was unsteady on his feet, and had glassy, bloodshot eyes. 13. The arresting officer testified that the vehicle was parked on the street in front of a restaurant. 14. The defendant also argues that the Commonwealth failed to meet its burden by not introducing sufficient evidence that the web mining, defendant’s friend was not the person operating the vehicle.

See Commonwealth v. Boothby, 64 Mass.App.Ct. 582, 582-583 (2005) (police arrived at scene after accident and multiple people claimed that they were driving the car at Essay Evolution, the time of the accident). Web Mining! Boothby, however, is beggars opera distinguishable from the current case because, here, the web mining, police only disorder cause found one possible operator at the scene and the present case does not involve a confession by the defendant. 15. This figure includes (1) ninety-one days between March 30, 2005 (the first scheduled pretrial hearing date), and web mining, June 29, 2005 (the actual date of the pretrial hearing); and (2) twenty-six days between August 19, 2005 (the first scheduled date for the final pretrial hearing), and September 14, 2005 (the actual date of the final pretrial hearing). 16. The defendant’s trial on an unrelated charge began on October 5, 2006. The excluded period extends until fourteen days after sentencing.

See Mass.R.Crim.P. 36(b)(2)(A)(iii). Due to a mutually agreed upon continuance, a change in counsel between the social capitalism, bifurcated portions of the trial, and another delay between the second portion of the trial and sentencing, the defendant was sentenced on March 24, 2006. Web Mining! Adding fourteen days to the sentencing date brings the date to April 7, 2006. Thus, the multiple disorder cause, total excludable period for the unrelated charge is 185 days from web mining October 5, 2006, to April 7, 2006. 17. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing Interview! Having identified a sufficient number of excluded days to confirm compliance with the requirement for a speedy trial, we do not compile a complete list of all excluded days.

18. The defendant also appeals from the denial of his pro web mining se motion to dismiss under G.L. c. 276, § 35. Evolution Of The Gangster! Assuming, arguendo, that the judge denied the motion–there is no record of such ruling–and that this issue is properly before this court, we affirm. General Laws c. 276, § 35, applies only to web mining, mid-trial continuances and the delay complained of by the defendant is prior to the commencement of trial and, thus, does not fall within the statute. A District Court jury found the defendant guilty of motor vehicle homicide by capitalism, operation under the influence of intoxicating liquor and negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24G[a]), and by web mining, negligent operation of a motor vehicle (in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24[2][a]). 75 Mass. Theories Of Attachment! App. Ct. 643.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. Argued March 6, 2009. Decided November 2, 2009. Paul C. Brennan, Dalton, for the defendant. David J. Gold, Assistant District Attorney (Garrett R. Web Mining! Fregault, Assistant District Attorney, with him) for the Commonwealth. Present: GRAHAM, DREBEN, #038; SIKORA, JJ. [75 Mass.

App. Ct. 644] A District Court jury found the defendant guilty of motor vehicle homicide by operation under the influence of intoxicating liquor and capitalism, negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24G[a]), and by negligent operation of a motor vehicle (in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24[2][a]). Web Mining! The defendant, who is African-American, appeals upon claims that (1) the trial judge improperly allowed the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenge of the only African-American in the venire; (2) the summarise theories of attachment, trial judge improperly admitted evidence of the defendant’s blood alcohol content and erroneously instructed the jury on that evidence; and (3) calculated improprieties by the prosecutor and extraneous influences upon the jury resulted in reversible error. We reverse. Web Mining! The trial judge did not offer a sufficiently adequate and contemporaneous explanation of her allowance of the peremptory challenge. Applicant’s After Undergoing Employment Interview Essay! In addition, the judge erroneously admitted evidence of the defendant’s blood alcohol content without the requisite expert testimony and gave an erroneous jury instruction in relation to that evidence.

Procedural background. On February 3, 2004, the New Bedford District Court issued a complaint charging the web mining, defendant with negligent operation of a motor vehicle in personality disorder violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a). Web Mining! On June 1, 2004, the same court issued an additional complaint charging the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by operation under the influence and negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. 90, § 24G[a]).1 On July 25, 2005, a District. Court judge allowed the Commonwealth’s motion to multiple personality cause, amend the June 1 complaint to add an web mining alternate theory of intoxication, a 0.08 percent “per se” violation of the motor vehicle homicide statute.2 On May 15, 2006, jury empanelment commenced. [75 Mass. App. Ct.

645] in New Bedford District Court, and on multiple disorder cause May 19, 2006, the jury returned guilty verdicts on both charges. The trial judge sentenced the defendant to two and one-half years in the house of correction on the motor vehicle homicide charge and a consecutive sentence of two years in the house of correction on the negligent operation charge. In December of 2006, the defendant filed a motion for relief from an unlawful sentence. He claimed that the negligent operation conviction was duplicative of the motor vehicle homicide conviction. In January of 2007, the trial judge allowed the motion. The allowance of that motion is not at issue in this appeal.3. Background.

The evidence at trial included the following. On November 27, 2003, at approximately 8:30 P.M., the web mining, defendant’s jeep and the victim’s vehicle collided at importance of emotional intelligence, an intersection in New Bedford. Four people witnessed the collision, and each of them testified at trial. According to the witnesses, the defendant’s jeep went through a stop sign at a high rate of speed and web mining, struck the victim’s vehicle. Define Social Capitalism! A New Bedford police officer arriving at web mining, the scene after the accident saw the defendant pacing back and forth in multiple personality cause an agitated manner. The officer spoke to web mining, the defendant and did not detect the odor of alcoholic beverages. The officer did not observe any other signs of intoxication, such as a lack of balance. The victim died at capitalism, the scene from multiple traumatic injuries. Paramedics took the defendant to the nearest hospital for treatment. Shortly after the web mining, collision, a New Bedford Police Department accident reconstruction expert investigated the cause of the crash.

She analyzed the damage to the vehicles and made numerous measurements of the beggars opera, crash scene. Based on web mining her investigation, the expert concluded that the defendant’s jeep had been traveling at sixty-four miles per hour when it entered the beggars opera, intersection.4. [75 Mass. App. Ct.

646] Soon after the web mining, defendant arrived at the hospital, two New Bedford police officers interviewed him. According to the officers, the defendant was “angry [and] agitated” and multiple personality, his breath smelled of alcoholic beverages. He told the web mining, officers that he had consumed “a forty of OE,” a forty-ounce bottle of Olde English brand beer. Both officers testified that the defendant’s demeanor changed when one of the officers notified him of the victim’s death. While at the hospital, the defendant complained of pain in his chest. In response to his complaint, hospital staff drew a blood sample from him and beggars opera, analyzed it. The doctor who had treated the defendant testified that his blood serum sample had an web mining alcohol reading of 185 milligrams per deciliter. A laboratory supervisor from the Massachusetts State police crime laboratory testified that the reading translated to a whole blood alcohol level of .15 to .16.

Discussion. 1. Peremptory challenge. Jury selection proceeded over two days. On the first day, the judge called juror to Applicant’s Interview, side bar for further questions. Web Mining! The juror told the judge that she was diabetic.

The judge assured her that the Essay about Evolution of the Gangster and America, disease would not be a problem. The juror noted also that her son had faced criminal charges in New Bedford District Court. She stated, however, that she could be a fair and impartial juror. The judge seated her conditionally in the jury box in advance of the parties’ challenges. The next day, the Commonwealth invoked one of its peremptory challenges to exclude juror.

The judge noted that juror nineteen was the web mining, only African-American in the jury pool from either day. Of Emotional Intelligence! She asked the Commonwealth to explain the challenge. In response, the prosecutor gave two reasons: (1) the juror’s speech and mannerisms indicated that she was slow and might have difficulty in the deliberation of the evidence of a three- or four-day trial; and web mining, (2) the prosecutor’s discomfort caused by the juror’s fixed stare at him during empanelment.5 The judge then determined that the prosecutor’s explanation was not race-based. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 647] Defense counsel asked for the judge’s impression of juror nineteen. The judge stated that the juror had “somewhat of a halting speech pattern” and was “not incredibly articulate but … not inarticulate either.” The judge did not, however, “associate [the juror's speech] with slowness mentally.” The prosecutor explained that he believed that juror nineteen’s mental acuity was similar to that of another juror whom the judge had removed for cause. The judge did not agree that juror nineteen suffered from a similar disability, but she allowed the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenge without further reasoning at that time.6 Defense counsel objected. On the following day, before the jury had entered the court room, the judge commented further on the Commonwealth’s peremptory challenge of juror nineteen.

She stated that, after the previous day’s discussion, she had consulted decisions on peremptory challenges of. members of protected classes,7 and that she “wanted to put some more … findings on summarise the record.” She recounted that she had requested an explanation for the peremptory challenge, and she repeated the prosecutor’s explanation. She noted also that the applicable case law requires “a two prong analysis. One having to web mining, do with the adequacy of the Commonwealth’s position once having been questioned about the reason for the challenge and then the genuineness of that.” Although the prosecutor had not mentioned the criminal. [75 Mass. App. Ct. Importance! 648] history of juror nineteen’s son when he had offered his explanation for the challenge, the judge referred to web mining, it in her findings.8 The judge concluded her findings with the statement that “I find … the Commonwealth’s explanation both adequate and genuine, which is why I allowed the challenges to summarise of attachment, stand.” Article 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Massachusetts Constitution and the equal protection clause of the Federal Constitution prohibit the use of web mining peremptory challenges to exclude prospective jurors on the basis of race. See Commonwealth v. Harris, 409 Mass. 461, 464, 567 N.E.2d 899 (1991). “[W]e begin with the presumption that a peremptory challenge is proper.” Commonwealth v. Essay About! Smith, 450 Mass.

395, 406, 879 N.E.2d 87, cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. Web Mining! 202, 172 L.Ed.2d 161 (2008). However, one may rebut that presumption through proof “that (1) a pattern of conduct has developed whereby several prospective jurors who have been challenged peremptorily are members of a discrete group, and Essay of the Gangster and America, (2) there is a likelihood they are being excluded from the jury solely by reason of their group membership.” Commonwealth v. Soares, 377 Mass. 461, 490, 387 N.E.2d 499, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 881, 100 S.Ct. 170, 62 L.Ed.2d 110 (1979). Either the party opposed to the challenge or the trial judge, sua sponte, may raise the issue of the propriety of the web mining, challenge. Multiple Personality! See Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Maldonado, 439 Mass. 460, 463, 788 N.E.2d 968 (2003). When “the judge initiates a sua sponte inquiry into the justification for beggars opera the challenge, this initiation almost necessarily includes an implicit finding that the prima facie case of discrimination has been made.” Id. at 463 n. 5, 788 N.E.2d 968. Once the prima facie case of discrimination has been made, the proponent of the peremptory challenge must provide an explanation which “pertain[s] to the individual qualities of the web mining, prospective juror and not to beggars opera, that juror’s group association.” Commonwealth v. Soares, supra at 491, 387 N.E.2d 499.

If the proponent’s. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 649] explanation seems superficial, the judge. should also allow rebuttal from the adverse party. See Commonwealth v. Calderon, 431 Mass. 21, 26, 725 N.E.2d 182 (2000). Web Mining! The judge must then “make an independent evaluation of the [proponent's] reasons and … determine specifically whether the explanation was bona fide or a pretext.” Ibid. “In other words, the disorder cause, judge must decide whether the explanation is both `adequate’ and `genuine.’” Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra at 464, 788 N.E.2d 968, quoting from Commonwealth v. Garrey, 436 Mass. 422, 428, 765 N.E.2d 725 (2002). “[I]t is imperative that the record explicitly contain the judge’s separate findings as to both adequacy and genuineness and, if necessary, an web mining explanation of those findings.” Commonwealth v. Beggars Opera! Maldonado, supra at 466, 788 N.E.2d 968. See Commonwealth v. Benoit, 452 Mass.

212, 221, 892 N.E.2d 314 (2008). In this case, the trial judge raised the web mining, question of the beggars opera, propriety of the peremptory challenge. She appropriately requested an explanation from the prosecutor (the proponent of the challenge) and allowed defense counsel to respond. See Commonwealth v. Soares, supra at 491, 387 N.E.2d 499; Commonwealth v. Calderon, supra at 26, 725 N.E.2d 182. The prosecutor explained that he was challenging the juror because he believed her to web mining, be “slow” and because she had stared at him in a discomforting manner. The judge received defense counsel’s opposing response. She then stated that, although the beggars opera, juror had “a halting speech pattern,” she did not find the juror mentally slow.

However, the judge concluded that the prosecutor had not misused the challenge and allowed it. Web Mining! It was not until the next day that the judge explicitly found the prosecutor’s explanation to be adequate and genuine. The judge’s own language demonstrates that she recognized generally the two-part standard of adequacy and genuineness. However, her ruling falls short of the firm and timely explanation for allowance required by theories, the line of cases culminating in Commonwealth v. Benoit, supra. Web Mining! As in Commonwealth v. Maldonado, supra, and Commonwealth v. Benoit, we cannot conclude that the judge properly allowed the challenge because the record does not show a prompt assessment of the adequacy and genuineness of the prosecutor’s explanation of the peremptory challenge. See Commonwealth v. Personality! Maldonado, supra at 466-467, 788 N.E.2d 968 (judge should not have accepted prosecutor’s peremptory challenge where judge. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 650] requested explanation and then allowed challenge but “did not find that the web mining, prosecutor had met her burden of theories establishing an adequate, race-neutral explanation that was the genuine reason for the challenge”); Commonwealth v. Benoit, supra at web mining, 222-226, 892 N.E.2d 314 (defendant’s right to beggars opera, trial by jury selected without discrimination not adequately protected where court could not determine whether trial judge gave meaningful consideration to adequacy and genuineness of reason for peremptory challenge).

In sum, the record contains references to three possible grounds for disqualification of the juror: her staring at the prosecutor; her suspected slowness; and the recent involvement of web mining her son as a defendant prosecuted by the same district attorney’s office.9 The judge did not address. the ground of staring.10 She rejected the suspected slowness. Essay About And America! She introduced, a day later, the experience of the son, a potentially serious ground but one never invoked by the prosecutor in web mining support of the suspect peremptory challenge.11 In these circumstances, we simply do not have the about of the Gangster and America, specific, clear findings upon adequacy and genuineness required by the cases to sustain the peremptory challenge. In particular, the web mining, judge did not find either of the prosecution’s grounds adequate, i.e., “personal to the juror and not based on the juror’s group affiliation” and “related to the particular case being tried,” however genuine or bona fide the offer may have been. Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. at 464-465, 788 N.E.2d 968. The governing standard is demanding. The precedents require reversal of the convictions. 2. Evidence of blood alcohol content.

The Commonwealth. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 651] began trial with two theories of operation under the influence, the per of emotional, se theory (blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or greater) and the impaired operation theory.

At the beginning of the web mining, trial, the judge gave preliminary instructions to the jury in which she explained the nature of the charges against the defendant. She made no reference to alternate theories of operation under the influence. Define Social Capitalism! During the trial, the Commonwealth introduced evidence of the defendant’s blood alcohol content but offered no expert testimony to explain the relationship between blood alcohol content and impaired operation. During the charge conference, the Commonwealth requested jury instruction on both theories. Web Mining! The judge stated that she was inclined not to give an instruction on the per se theory, and the Commonwealth agreed with that proposal. The judge instructed the jury, in relevant part, as follows: “The law says that if the Essay about Evolution of the Gangster and America, percentage of alcohol by weight in the defendant’s blood was .08 percent or more[,] from web mining such evidence you may, if you wish, draw an inference that the defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time.” For reasons discussed below, the instruction was erroneous.

The defendant did not object to the blood test evidence, the prosecutor’s reference to it in his summation, or the judge’s erroneous instruction. In 2003, the Legislature amended both G.L. c. Disorder! 90, § 24G, the motor vehicle homicide statute, and web mining, G.L. c. 90, § 24(a)(1), the operation under the influence (OUI) statute, to add the per se theory of intoxication. Beggars Opera! St.2003, c. 28, §§ 1, 21, 22. Pursuant to the amendments, the Commonwealth may prove intoxication through evidence that the defendant had “a percentage, by weight, of alcohol in [his] blood of eight one-hundredths or greater.” G.L. c. 90, § 24G(a). Prior to web mining, the amendments, the statutes allowed the permissible inference of intoxication when the defendant had a blood alcohol content of .08 percent or greater. Beggars Opera! Commonwealth v. Colturi, 448 Mass. Web Mining! 809, 811-812, 864 N.E.2d 498 (2007). The 2003 amendments eliminated. the permissible inference and replaced it with a conclusive inference.

See Commonwealth v. Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. About Of The! 661, 662, 885 N.E.2d 164 n. 2, S.C., 453 Mass. Web Mining! 1009, 902 N.E.2d 368 (2008). In Commonwealth v. Colturi, supra, the Supreme Judicial Court held that, if the Commonwealth relies solely on an impaired operation theory, breathalyzer readings are inadmissible in Gangster and America the. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 652] absence of expert testimony to explain their significance.

Id. at 817-818, 864 N.E.2d 498. The decision states: “If … the Commonwealth were to proceed only on web mining a theory of multiple personality cause impaired operation [instead of both a per web mining, se theory and an impaired operation theory] and offered a breathalyzer test result of .08 or greater, without evidence of its relationship to intoxication or impairment and without the of attachment, statutorily permissible inference of intoxication eliminated by the 2003 amendments, the jury would be left to web mining, guess at its meaning.” Ibid. As for trials where the Commonwealth relies on both theories, the decision states further: “[I]f the per multiple, se and impaired ability theories of criminal liability are charged in the alternative … and so tried, we see no prejudice in the admission of web mining breathalyzer test results without expert testimony establishing the significance of the test level to the degree of intoxication or impairment of the defendant. In such a case, the jury presumably would be instructed that if they find the summarise theories, defendant operated her motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater, she is guilty of violating the OUI statute, and if they do not so find, they may still consider whether she violated the web mining, statute by operating while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”

Id. at 817, 864 N.E.2d 498. We presume that this language applies to Applicant’s Essay, the results of web mining blood tests in addition to the results of breathalyzer tests. After issuance of Commonwealth v. Define Social Capitalism! Colturi, supra, we held, in Commonwealth v. Web Mining! Hubert, supra, that where the Commonwealth relied solely on an impaired operation theory, and the judge admitted breathalyzer results without expert testimony and over the defendant’s objection, admission of the results required reversal. Social! Id. at 664, 885 N.E.2d 164. In this case, the complaint charged both theories.

The judge admitted evidence of the defendant’s blood alcohol content without expert testimony to web mining, explain its relationship to Essay about Evolution, intoxication. The judge did not instruct the jury on the per se theory. Furthermore, the judge erroneously instructed the jury on the permissible inference of intoxication eliminated by the 2003 amendments. See. [75 Mass. App. Ct. 653] Commonwealth v. Colturi, supra at 811-812, 864 N.E.2d 498; Commonwealth v. Hubert, supra, at 662 n. Web Mining! 2, 885 N.E.2d 164.12 The defendant argues that the erroneous instruction and the admission of the blood test evidence without the requisite expert testimony require reversal. Since the defendant did not object to the alleged errors, we review for the substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.

Under that standard, the question becomes whether the erroneous instruction and the blood alcohol evidence may have influenced the verdict of guilt. Commonwealth v. Essay! Alphas, 430 Mass. 8, 13, 712 N.E.2d 575 (1999). See Commonwealth v. Azar, 435 Mass. 675, 687, 760 N.E.2d 1224 (2002);

Commonwealth v. Randolph, 438 Mass. 290, 297, 780 N.E.2d 58 (2002). Even without the blood test, the Commonwealth’s evidence of intoxication was strong. The percipient witnesses testified that the web mining, defendant drove through a stop sign at a high speed and hit the victim’s vehicle. A police officer who was at the scene testified that the defendant was agitated, although he testified also that he did not notice any other signs of intoxication. The accident reconstruction expert testified that the defendant’s jeep had been traveling at sixty-four miles per hour when it entered the intersection.

The officers who interviewed the defendant at the hospital testified that he was agitated, that his breath smelled of disorder alcoholic beverages, and that he confessed to consumption of forty ounces of beer earlier in the evening. However, the laboratory supervisor’s testimony that the defendant had a blood alcohol content between .15 and .16 percent may have been the most compelling evidence of intoxication. Web Mining! Without it, the Commonwealth’s evidence was “strong but not overwhelming.” Commonwealth v. Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. at 663, 885 N.E.2d 164. Here, as in Hubert, police testimony about the defendant’s signs of intoxication differed. Under the impaired operation theory submitted to the jury, the error may have materially influenced the verdict and therefore created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of personality justice. See Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. 556, 564, 227 N.E.2d 3 (1967)13; Commonwealth v. Alphas, 430 Mass. at 13, 712 N.E.2d 575. [75 Mass. App. Web Mining! Ct. Multiple! 654]

Conclusion.14,15 For the foregoing reasons we reverse the judgments and set aside the verdicts. The case is remanded to the District Court for web mining a new trial or other proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1. Applicant’s Employment Interview! In addition to the negligent operation charge, the web mining, February 3 complaint charged the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by negligent operation in violation of G.L. Applicant’s Undergoing Employment! c. 90, § 24G(b). After issuance of the June 1 complaint, which charged the defendant with motor vehicle homicide by operation under the influence and by negligent operation (in violation of G.L. c. Web Mining! 90, § 24G[a]), the Commonwealth nol prossed the motor vehicle homicide charge from the beggars opera, first complaint. 2. Under G.L. c. 90, § 24G(a), the Commonwealth may use either of two theories to prove operation under the influence: (1) operation “with a percent by weight, of alcohol in [the] blood of eight one-hundredths or greater, or [2] while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.” G.L. c. 90, § 24G(a), as amended through St.2003, c. 28, § 21.

See Commonwealth v. Colturi, 448 Mass. 809, 810, 864 N.E.2d 498 (2007); Commonwealth v. Hubert, 71 Mass.App.Ct. 661, 661-662, 885 N.E.2d 164 (2008), S.C., 453 Mass. 1009, 902 N.E.2d 368 (2009). Prior to the amendment of the June 1 complaint, the web mining, complaint alleged only the second theory. 3. In April of 2007, after a hearing, the theories, trial judge allowed the Commonwealth’s motion to file a late notice of appeal from the grant of the defendant’s motion for relief from an unlawful sentence.

The Commonwealth’s appeal has not entered in this court. Web Mining! In its brief, the Commonwealth does not argue the propriety of the grant of the theories of attachment, motion. Therefore, we do not address it. 4. She opined also that the web mining, defendant’s jeep had struck a vehicle parked on the side of the road prior to the collision with the victim’s vehicle. 5. Beggars Opera! In its entirety, the prosecutor’s explanation was: “Judge, she appears slow to web mining, me at beggars opera, side-bar in her speech and mannerisms and while we were impaneling today, I locked eyes with her a few times and web mining, it appeared to importance of emotional, me that she was staring at me, staring me down while we were at the side-bar; and it bothered me. But I do find that she’s slow at side-bar speaking with her, in her speech; and I’m concerned that this is a three or four day trial, a lot of web mining witnesses; and I’m concerned about her ability to social, try the evidence.” 6. The judge observed that the defendant had adequately preserved the issue for appeal. During the discussion of the challenge, the judge asked the prosecutor why he had used another peremptory challenge on juror fourteen. Web Mining! On the previous day, the judge had asked juror fourteen, a white male, some questions at beggars opera, side bar, and the juror had noted the presence of only one African American in the venire. Web Mining! The prosecutor stated that he should not have to explain his use of define a peremptory challenge on juror fourteen because the juror was not a member of a protected class. However, he supplied an explanation, and the judge allowed the challenge.

7. The parties assert that the web mining, judge stated that she had read Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. 460, 788 N.E.2d 968 (2003). However, the transcript reflects that the judge stated that she “look[ed] over the case law, particularly Commonwealth v. Mulder (phonetic), with respect to the possibility of a peremptory challenge being used to exclude members of a [discrete] group….” The reference (jumbled in personality cause transcription) most probably was the Maldonado decision. 8. The judge’s reference to the criminal history of juror nineteen’s son was as follows: “I would also add that it was known to web mining, all of us that [juror nineteen] had had a son who had apparently a criminal matter in this court, perhaps even before me because she seemed to recall me, just this past fall that was prosecuted by the district attorney’s office and apparently came up…. [A]nd I don’t remember the case per intelligence, se but she spoke about it. It apparently just happened last fall.”

The judge went on to say that she understood the Commonwealth’s concern “whether she could perform in a truly objective manner” because her son had experienced the criminal justice process and subsequent incarceration. The record does not show any expression of that specific concern by web mining, the prosecutor. 9. As mentioned above, in the next-day review of her reasons for allowance of the peremptory challenge, the judge referred to the experience of juror nineteen’s son in the New Bedford District Court. Multiple Personality Cause! See note 8, supra. The prosecutor did not refer to the criminal history of the juror’s son as justification for his peremptory challenge.

A judge may not supply her own reasons to justify a prosecutor’s peremptory challenge. See Commonwealth v. Fryar, 414 Mass. 732, 739, 610 N.E.2d 903 (1993), S.C., 425 Mass. Web Mining! 237, 680 N.E.2d 901, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1033, 118 S.Ct.

636, 139 L.Ed.2d 615 (1997). 10. That explanation had little chance of success. “Challenges based on subjective data such as a juror’s looks or gestures, or a party’s `gut’ feeling should rarely be accepted as adequate because such explanations can easily be used as pretexts for discrimination.” Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 439 Mass. at 465, 788 N.E.2d 968. 11. This reasoning does not interfere with the capitalism, authority of a trial judge spontaneously to identify, establish, and web mining, rule upon a ground of disqualification independently of any challenge of either the Commonwealth or a defendant. 12. The charge conference and instructions to the jury in the trial occurred in multiple disorder cause May, 2006. The Supreme Judicial Court released the Colturi decision in April 2007; and this court the web mining, Hubert decision in May 2008. Therefore the judge and trial counsel did not have the benefit of summarise those interpretations of the 2003 amendments. 13. In Commonwealth v. Hubert, supra at 664, 885 N.E.2d 164, defense counsel made timely objections and preserved the issue so that the standard of review was the presence of prejudicial error.

Here we have reviewed the issue under the less demanding standard of substantial risk and web mining, found the error again sufficiently serious to require reversal. 14. As mentioned in the introduction, supra, the defendant argues also that extraneous influences on the jury and alleged calculated impropriety by the prosecutor require reversal. The extraneous influences were (1) a shout by the victim’s mother at the defendant as the jurors left the intelligence, courtroom on the first day of trial, and web mining, (2) the summarise theories, presence of a makeshift memorial to the victim at the accident scene during the jury’s view of the site. The claim of calculated impropriety by web mining, the prosecutor arises from beggars opera testimony of two police officers that they told the defendant that he had “killed” the web mining, victim. The defendant asserts that the prosecutor intended that the officers testify in this manner, in violation of the judge’s decision on a motion in limine.

No evidence supports the view that the mother’s outburst or the accident site memorial overcame the judge’s instructions for a verdict based strictly on the evidence. The claim related to the officers’ use of the beggars opera, word “killed” fails also, because the judge gave immediate curative instructions. 15. The defendant presented no issue of a denial of the right to confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by reason of the web mining, admission of the blood alcohol test result. The rule of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, ___ U.S. Of Emotional! ___, 129 S.Ct.

2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009), has played no part in the appeal. Massachusetts OUI Case – Defendnat admitted to web mining, the officer that his driver’s license was suspended, and at trial he testified that he knew he was suspended for an operating under the influence (OUI) conviction. Gerald W. GILMAN. Supreme Judicial Court of theories Maine. Argued: November 9, 2009. Decided: April 13, 2010. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. Andrew S. Robinson, Asst.

Dist. Atty. Web Mining! (orally), Franklin County DA’s Office, Farmington, ME, for the State of Maine. Walter Hanstein III, Esq. (orally), Joyce, David #038; Hanstein, P.A., Farmington, ME, for Gerald W. Gilman. Panel SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ. ? 1 The State of Maine appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Franklin County, Murphy, J.) denying its motion to social, correct the sentence that the court imposed on Gerald W. Web Mining! Gilman following his conviction at a bench trial for operating after habitual offender revocation (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2)(2008).1 See M.R.Crim. P. 35(a). The State contends that the Essay, court imposed an illegal sentence when it sentenced Gilman to less than the minimum mandatory two-year term of imprisonment required by web mining, the statute. The court did so after finding that the Applicant’s Undergoing Interview, statute as applied to web mining, Gilman violated article I, section 9 of the Maine Constitution, which requires that “all penalties and punishments shall be proportioned to importance intelligence, the offense.” Me.

Const. Web Mining! art. I, ? 9. ? 2 Gilman cross-appeals, contending that, in addition to violating article I, section 9 of the theories, Maine Constitution, the mandatory sentencing provision also violated his equal protection and due process rights.2 Additionally, he argues that the. court erred in admitting a certified record from the web mining, Secretary of State declaring him to beggars opera, be a habitual offender, because doing so violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him as articulated in web mining Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), and its progeny. ? 3 The State’s appeal is accompanied by Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Essay, the written approval of the web mining, Attorney General as required by 15 M.R.S. ? 2115-A(2-B), (5) (2009) and M.R.App. P. 21(b). Multiple Personality Disorder Cause! Because we agree with the State’s contention that the sentence imposed on Gilman was illegal, and find no violation of Gilman’s constitutional rights, we vacate only the web mining, sentence and remand for resentencing. ? 4 The facts are not in dispute. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing Essay! On April 11, 2007, Gerald Gilman was stopped for speeding in the Town of web mining New Sharon, three miles from after Undergoing Employment Essay his home. He had not been drinking.

Gilman, a member of the local Elks Club, was returning from the club’s lodge, where he had repaired a broken walk-in cooler. Gilman admitted to the officer that his driver’s license was suspended, and at web mining, trial he testified that he knew he was suspended for an operating under the influence (OUI) conviction. Theories! In fact, Gilman’s license had been revoked as a result of multiple previous convictions, which included three convictions for OUI within the web mining, previous ten years. A certified record from the Secretary of State, admitted at trial over beggars opera, Gilman’s objection, showed that he had been given proper notice of the revocation. ? 5 Gilman was indicted for operating after revocation (Class C). The charge was enhanced because of web mining his three OUI convictions within the previous ten years.

29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2). Multiple Disorder! Section 2557-A, which was enacted as part of what is popularly known as “Tina’s Law,” provides that in that circumstance “the minimum fine . . . is $1,000 and the minimum term of web mining imprisonment is 2 years, neither of which may be suspended by beggars opera, the court.” 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D); P.L. 2005, ch. 606, ? A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006). ? 6 Gilman moved to dismiss the allegation of the aggravating factor of his prior OUI convictions as a violation of his equal protection guarantees. Dismissal of the web mining, allegation would have reduced the charge to a Class D crime. Capitalism! See 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(A) (2008).3 At a hearing, Gilman argued that because there was no allegation that he was under the influence when he was stopped, it was irrational to web mining, aggravate the operating after revocation (OAR) charge with prior convictions for OUI. The Superior Court (Jabar, J.) denied the motion. ? 7 At a jury-waived trial held on February 11, 2008, Gilman objected that his rights under the Confrontation Clause would be violated by the admission of a certificate issued by the Secretary of State under seal declaring that (1) his right to drive was under revocation when he was stopped, (2) he had proper notice of the revocation, and (3) his driving record included three OUI convictions within the previous ten years. The court (Murphy, J.) overruled the objection, denied Gilman’s motion for a judgment of importance of emotional acquittal, and took the ultimate issue of whether the web mining, State had met its burden of proof under advisement.

Gilman then filed a written. argument asking the court to revisit its earlier rejection of his equal protection argument, and asserting that the Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment, mandatory two-year sentence that would result if he were convicted would violate article I, section 9 of the Maine Constitution. The court heard argument and took the issues under advisement. ? 8 On September 8, the web mining, court issued a written decision finding Gilman guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision further explained the court’s reasoning on the Confrontation Clause issue and theories of attachment, again denied Gilman’s equal protection claim.

On his claim of unconstitutionally disproportionate punishment, the court deferred a decision pending further argument by the parties. Before further argument could be heard, Gilman moved the court to reconsider its verdict, citing State v. Stade, 683 A.2d 164 (Me.1996), as authority for his argument that convicting him of a Class C offense constituted a due process violation because the State did not individually notify him that “Tina’s Law” increased the penalties if he were to be convicted of OAR after it took effect. ? 9 On October 27, the court heard argument on Gilman’s due process claim and denied it. It then heard testimony relevant to the disproportionate punishment issue and web mining, sentencing from Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Essay four witnesses: another member of the Elks Club, a psychiatrist who treated Gilman through the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Gilman’s sister, and Gilman himself. Web Mining! At the beggars opera, conclusion of the hearing, the court took the disproportionate punishment issue and web mining, the sentence under advisement. ? 10 On November 17, the court issued written findings and conclusions: This Court concludes, after consideration of the characteristics of intelligence Mr. Gilman, as well as the manner in web mining which this sentence would be carried out, that imposition of a two-year mandatory minimum sentence would be greatly disproportionate to about of the Gangster, the offense, and web mining, also concludes that it would offend prevailing notions of decency. The Defendant has carried his burden in his claim that the mandatory two-year prison term would be unconstitutionally disproportionate, as applied to Mr. Gilman.

? 11 At a final hearing on December 11, the court conducted the statutorily required sentencing analysis on the Class C conviction and sentenced Gilman to fifteen months imprisonment, with all but ninety days suspended, two years of probation, 500 hours of community service, and a $1000 fine. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252-C (2009). The State orally moved the about Gangster and America, court to web mining, correct what it viewed as an illegal sentence pursuant to define social capitalism, M.R.Crim. P. 35(a);4 the motion was denied orally and later in a written order. Web Mining! This appeal and cross-appeal followed. A. Scope of about Evolution and America Article I, Section 9. ? 12 Article I of the Maine Constitution is a declaration of rights enjoyed by web mining, Maine citizens. Section 9 sets limits on of attachment the State’s power to punish: “Sanguinary laws shall not be passed; all penalties and punishments shall be proportioned to web mining, the offense; excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel nor unusual punishments inflicted.” Me. Const. art. I, ? 9. ? 13 The statute under which Gilman was convicted unambiguously required the Superior Court to impose an summarise theories unsuspended prison sentence of at least two years.

29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D). Accordingly, the court’s lesser sentence was facially illegal unless the court was correct in its two central rulings: (1) article I, section 9 requires that punishments be proportionate to the offense after considering the circumstances of the particular offender, not simply proportionate to web mining, the offense itself, and about and America, (2) because of Gilman’s individual circumstances, the mandatory sentence was disproportionate to his offense, and therefore the statute is unconstitutional in this instance.5 Gilman’s burden is web mining significant, as “one challenging the constitutionality of a statute bears a heavy burden of proving unconstitutionality since all acts of the Legislature are presumed constitutional.” State v. Vanassche, 566 A.2d 1077, 1081 (Me.1989) (quotation marks omitted). We review de novo whether he met that burden through a showing of “strong and convincing reasons.” Town of Frye Island v. State, 2008 ME 27, ? 13, 940 A.2d 1065, 1069. ? 14 Whether the Maine Constitution requires that punishments be proportionate to the offender, as well as the offense, has been an open question. In discussing a closely related provision of section 9, we left it unanswered: Assuming, without deciding, that it may be possible in rare cases that a mandatory minimum sentence is cruel and unusual because of the characteristics of the multiple disorder cause, individual or because of the manner in which the sentence is web mining carried out, there was not enough information in this case for the trial court to reach that conclusion. State v. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 7, 815 A.2d 375, 377 (footnote omitted).6. ? 15 This case requires us to answer the of the and America, question left open in Worthley. For several reasons, we conclude that (1) section 9 requires only that a punishment be proportionate to the offense for which a person is convicted, (2) the two-year mandatory sentence prescribed by statute is web mining proportionate to the offense that Gilman committed, and (3) the sentence imposed by the trial court was therefore illegal and. must be vacated. Accordingly, to the extent that Worthley suggested that it may be possible for a mandatory sentence to Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview Essay, be unconstitutionally disproportionate under article I, section 9 solely because of an individual defendant’s particular circumstances, we now hold that it is not possible.

? 16 The plain language of section 9 requires that “punishments shall be proportioned to the offense.” Me. Const. art. I, ? 9 (emphasis added). It says nothing about the individual offender. This is of primary importance because we have said: In interpreting our State Constitution, we look primarily to web mining, the language used.

Because the same principles employed in the construction of statutory language hold true in the construction of a constitutional provision, we apply the plain language of the constitutional provision if the language is unambiguous. Voorhees v. Sagadahoc County, 2006 ME 79, ? 6, 900 A.2d 733, 735-36 (citation omitted) (quotation marks omitted). The language of section 9 is unambiguous, and therefore we give it its plain meaning. See Joyce v. State, 2008 ME 108, ? 11, 951 A.2d 69, 72 (stating that “it is a fundamental rule of statutory interpretation that words in a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meanings” (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted)). ? 17 Our prior decisions support this construction.

In each case where a minimum mandatory punishment imposed by the Legislature has been challenged as disproportionate or cruel and unusual under section 9, we have rejected the Essay Evolution and America, challenge after considering the defendant’s conduct.7 Only in Worthley did we refer to the characteristics of the individual offender, and web mining, then only to point out that we were not required in that case to decide whether individual characteristics could ever be a factor in the proportionality analysis. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 7, 815 A.2d at about, 377. ? 18 Furthermore, although federal authority does not control our interpretation of our State Constitution, it is web mining instructive that in its recent Eighth Amendment jurisprudence the Supreme Court has upheld or struck down severe sentences based on consideration of a particular offense or category of offender,8 but has not. required an beggars opera individualized determination that a mandatory punishment is appropriate except in death penalty cases. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 996, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (“We have drawn the line of required individualized sentencing at capital cases, and see no basis for extending it further.”). Regarding the Federal Constitution, the First Circuit Court of Appeals noted:

There is web mining no constitutional right, in non-capital cases, to beggars opera, individualized sentencing. Legislatures are free to web mining, provide for mandatory sentences for particular offenses.. Self-Perception After Essay! . . The mere fact that a sentence is mandatory and severe does not make it cruel and unusual within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment. United States v. Campusano, 947 F.2d 1, 3-4 (1st Cir.1991). ? 19 A plain-language construction of section 9 is web mining further supported by our cases holding that the social capitalism, Legislature has the power to web mining, enact mandatory sentences. See State v. Lane, 649 A.2d 1112, 1115 (Me.1994) (collecting cases). Beggars Opera! Implicit in web mining those decisions is a recognition that the Legislature may lawfully choose to remove a sentencing court’s discretion when it determines it is appropriate to do so, subject only to the constitutional prohibition against punishment disproportionate to a given offense. The construction urged by Gilman would go far beyond what the summarise of attachment, language of web mining section 9 requires and effectively vitiate all mandatory sentencing statutes. ? 20 A minimum mandatory sentence is the Legislature’s establishment of a basic sentence, and a legislative decision that a sentencing court may not find that mitigating factors justify a lesser maximum sentence.9 Consideration of a defendant’s individual circumstances in finding that a mandatory sentence is disproportionate as applied to that person is simply reinstatement by importance, judicial declaration of a sentencing court’s ordinary discretion to weigh mitigating factors, and web mining, then impose a maximum sentence that is lower than the basic sentence. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252-C(2). A court would then always have the sentencing discretion that the Legislature intended to remove, because individual mitigating circumstances could always be used as justification to impose less than the beggars opera, mandatory minimum sentence on web mining the ground that the Essay of the Gangster, mandatory sentence is disproportionate as applied in web mining a particular case. We do not read article I, section 9 to render the Legislature’s authority to enact mandatory sentences a nullity.10.

? 21 Because we hold that the clause, “all penalties and punishments shall be proportioned to the offense,” means what its plain language says, and does not require consideration of the individual circumstances of each offender, the sentence imposed on Gilman was illegal unless it. was disproportionate to the crime he committed. B. The Two-Year Minimum Mandatory Sentence. ? 22 This Court “always has the power and duty to define social capitalism, uphold the State and Federal Constitutions,” and will “protect the individual from an unconstitutional invasion of his rights by the legislative . . . branch of government.” Dep’t of Corr. v. Web Mining! Superior Court, 622 A.2d 1131, 1134-35 (Me.1993) (quotation marks omitted). Nevertheless, we recognize the primacy of the Legislature as “the voice of the sovereign people” in the area of crime and punishment: The fixing of an adequate criminal penalty is properly and legitimately a matter of theories legislative concern. It is not the office of the web mining, judiciary to multiple personality disorder cause, interpose constitutional limitations where none need be found.

Of course a mandatory sentence of great severity may at some point lose its rational relation to a permissible legislative purpose; a disparity between the sentence and the evil to be avoided might then be a cruelty of constitutional dimensions. It seems to us that the interest of the legislature is paramount in the field of penology and the public safety. The legislature defines the contours of the crime itself, and web mining, sets the limits for punishment. . Importance Of Emotional Intelligence! . . Web Mining! The underlying structure of the penal system is statutory; the coherence of the multiple disorder cause, system is to web mining, be found in legislative direction. State v. King, 330 A.2d 124, 127-28 (Me. 1974); see State v. Benner, 553 A.2d 219, 220 (Me.1989) (“The power of punishment is vested in the legislative, not in the judicial department. It is the legislature, not the court, which is to define a crime and ordain its punishment.” (quotation marks omitted)). ? 23 We have described the importance of emotional intelligence, test for determining when a sentence is cruel and unusual as whether it “is greatly disproportionate. . . and whether it offends prevailing notions of decency,” Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d at 376; whether it “shocks the conscience of the public, or our own respective or collective sense of fairness,” State v. Web Mining! Reardon, 486 A.2d 112, 121 (Me.1984); or whether it is “inhuman or barbarous,” State v. Heald, 307 A.2d 188, 192 (Me.1973). Because the Legislature is “the voice of the sovereign people,” King, 330 A.2d at 127, and thus expresses the people’s will, only the most extreme punishment decided upon by that body as appropriate for an offense could so offend or shock the collective conscience of the people of Maine as to be unconstitutionally disproportionate, or cruel and unusual.11 In short, our system of government assumes that the judgment of the Legislature is the collective judgment of the people.

? 24 Gilman was convicted of a Class C crime, punishable by a maximum of five years imprisonment. See 17-A M.R.S. Essay About Of The And America! ? 1252(2)(C) (2009). The Legislature mandated a sentence for his conduct of two years, or forty percent of the maximum. 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2XD). It deemed that penalty necessary to prevent revoked drivers with three recent OUI convictions, who have repeatedly proved. that they are willing to endanger others by web mining, operating a motor vehicle while impaired, from continuing to drive under any circumstances. A mandated sentence for that conduct on the lower end of the zero-to-five-years scale is importance intelligence not the rare, extreme, or shocking case, and does not violate the proportionality requirement of web mining article I, section 9. C. Equal Protection. ? 25 Gilman contends that, because he was not impaired when he was stopped for speeding, the Legislature had no rational basis for define social increasing his sentence for operating after revocation because of web mining his prior OUI convictions.

He acknowledges that in importance order to reach the result he seeks, we would be required to overrule our decision in State v. Chapin, where the same argument was advanced and web mining, rejected. 610 A.2d 259, 261 (Me.1992). ? 26 In Chapin, we concluded that the multiple, danger created by drunk drivers was “certainly strong enough” to web mining, justify the imposition of a minimum mandatory sentence for habitual offenders with OUI convictions who continue to drive. Id. Gilman makes no showing that that danger has been reduced since 1992, when Chapin was decided, and we find that the rational relationship of prior OUI convictions to Applicant’s Self-Perception Interview Essay, an enhanced sentence for operating after revocation remains intact.

? 27 Gilman next contends, on the authority of State v. Stade, 683 A.2d 164, that because his license had been revoked, the State was required to individually notify him that the minimum statutory penalties for web mining operating after revocationM had increased with the social, enactment of 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A. See P.L. 2005, ch. 606, ? A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006). ? 28 In Stade, we held that a defendant’s due process rights may be violated when an agent of the web mining, State makes affirmative misrepresentations that are then relied upon to the defendant’s detriment. 683 A.2d at 166. Here the State did not make any affirmative misrepresentation as to the penalties Gilman would face if he chose to drive and thus knowingly violated the law. The Legislature changed the statute, the Governor signed it into law, and Applicant’s after Essay, Gilman is presumed to know what the law is. See Houghton v. Web Mining! Hughes, 108 Me. Multiple Personality Disorder! 233, 236-37, 79 A. 909 (1911).

Contrary to Gilman’s argument, due process did not require that he be individually notified of the change in web mining order to Employment, ensure that he could conduct a thoughtful cost/benefit analysis before consciously choosing to break the law. Moreover, the law in effect at the time of his most recent OUI conviction provided that he could be sentenced to as long as five years in prison for the operation of any vehicle before his license was restored. See 17-A M.R.S. ? 1252(2)(C); 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557(2)(B)(2) (2005).12. E. Confrontation Clause. ? 29 Gilman finally contends that his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him was violated when the Superior Court admitted, over his objection, a certified record from the Secretary of State stating that his privilege to operate had been revoked, that he had received proper notice of the revocation, and web mining, that he had three OUI convictions within the preceding ten years. As. with his equal protection challenge, Gilman acknowledges that he can prevail only if we overrule recent precedent, specifically State v. Tayman, 2008 ME 177, 960 A.2d 1151. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Undergoing! In Tayman, we held that a disputed Secretary of web mining State certification did not offend the cause, Confrontation Clause because “the certification served only to confirm the authenticity of the underlying records of the Violations Bureau, which themselves contain only routine, nontestimonial information.” 2008 ME 177, ? 24, 960 A.2d at 1158; see also State v. Web Mining! Knight, 2009 ME 32, ? 10, 967 A.2d 723, 725 (relying on Tayman).

? 30 Gilman contends that Tayman must be overruled on the authority of the Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, ___ U.S. Essay Evolution Of The And America! ___, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009). In Melendez-Diaz, the Court held that the admission of a chemist’s certificate stating that an analyzed substance was cocaine violated the Sixth Amendment, because although “documents kept in web mining the regular course of beggars opera business may ordinarily be admitted at trial despite their hearsay status. . Web Mining! . that is not the case if the regularly conducted business activity is the production of beggars opera evidence for use at trial.” Id. at 2538, 174 L.Ed.2d at 328 (citation omitted). ? 31 We recently analyzed the impact of Melendez-Diaz on Tayman and concluded that Tayman remains good law. State v. Murphy, 2010 ME 28, ? 26, 991 A.2d 35, 43. Tayman controls the result here and consequently Gilman’s argument fails.

Judgment of web mining conviction affirmed. Sentence vacated; remanded to the Superior Court for beggars opera resentencing. 1 The statute provided: D. Web Mining! A person is guilty of a Class C crime if the person commits the crime of operating after habitual offender revocation and: (2) The person has 3 or more convictions for importance of emotional violating section 2411 Criminal OUI or former Title 29, section 1312-B within the web mining, previous 10 years. The minimum fine for a Class C crime under this paragraph is Self-Perception after Interview $1,000 and the minimum term of web mining imprisonment is 2 years, neither of which may be suspended by the court. 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D) (2008). The statute has since been amended, though not in any way that affects this case. P.L.

2009, ch. 54, ? 5 (effective April 22, 2009) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(D)(2) (2009)). 2 Gilman does not specify whether his due process and equal protection claims are grounded in beggars opera the United States or Maine Constitutions. In any event, those protections are coextensive. See Conlogue v. Web Mining! Conlogue, 2006 ME 12, ? 6, 890 A.2d 691, 694 (citing cases). 3 The statute has since been amended, though not in any way that affects this case. Summarise! P.L. 2009, ch. Web Mining! 54, ? 5 (effective April 22, 2009) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557-A(2)(A) (2009)).

4 The Rule provides: “On motion of the . Theories Of Attachment! . . attorney for the state . . . made within one year after a sentence is imposed, the justice or judge who imposed sentence may correct an web mining illegal sentence or a sentence imposed in an illegal manner.” M.R.Crim. P. 35(a). 5 At oral argument, Gilman suggested that the minimum mandatory sentence for his offense must also be proportional in context, that is, it must be proportionate not only to his specific crime, but also to the sentences imposed by the Legislature for other crimes. We find no support for his contention that we must place crimes and penalties on a continuum before deciding whether a particular penalty is constitutional, and we do not address this argument further. 6 Although the Maine Constitution, unlike the United States Constitution, delineates the protections against disproportionate punishments and cruel or unusual punishments separately, both the Supreme Court and this Court have understood them to be related. See Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct.

2641, 171 L.Ed.2d 525, 538 (2008) (“The Eighth Amendment proscribes all excessive punishments, as well as cruel and unusual punishments that may or may not be excessive. Beggars Opera! . . . The Eighth Amendment’s protection . . . flows from the basic precept of justice that punishment for a crime should be graduated and web mining, proportioned to the offense.” (quotation marks omitted)); State v. Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d 375, 376 (“In analyzing whether a sentence is cruel and unusual as applied, we look to whether the sentence is beggars opera greatly disproportionate to the offense and whether it offends prevailing notions of decency.”); State v. Frye, 390 A.2d 520, 521 (Me. Web Mining! 1978) (“A mandatory sentence is not cruel and unusual punishment unless the sentence is greatly disproportionate to the offense or the punishment offends prevailing notions of decency”); Tinkle, The Maine State Constitution: A Reference Guide (1992) at importance intelligence, 43 (“The interpretation of `cruel or unusual punishment’ also is informed by the requirement of web mining proportionality.”). 7 See Worthley, 2003 ME 14, ? 6, 815 A.2d at 376-77 (holding minimum mandatory sentence for OUI not disproportionate or cruel and unusual); State v. Vanassche, 566 A.2d 1077, 1080-81 (Me.1989) (holding forty-eight hour mandatory sentence for multiple disorder cause OUI with blood-alcohol level of 0.15% or more not disproportionate to the crime); State v. Web Mining! Frye, 390 A.2d 520, 521 (Me. Multiple! 1978) (holding mandatory four-year sentence for web mining robbery with a firearm not disproportionate to the offense); State v. Briggs, 388 A.2d 507, 508 (Me. 1978) (holding mandatory $500 fine for night hunting not excessive); State v. King, 330 A.2d 124, 125, 127 (Me.1974) (holding minimum mandatory sentence for sale of amphetamine not disproportionate and thus not cruel and unusual); State v. Farmer, 324 A.2d 739, 745-46 (Me. 1974) (holding minimum mandatory two-year sentence for intelligence armed assault not cruel and web mining, unusual); State v. Lubee, 93 Me. 418, 45 A. 520 (1899) (holding fine for short lobsters not unconstitutionally excessive and value of lobsters in particular case irrelevant); c.f. Of Emotional Intelligence! State v. Web Mining! Alexander, 257 A.2d 778, 783 (Me.

1969) (holding five-day sentence imposed by court in its discretion for contemptuous “reprehensible conduct” not excessive or cruel or unusual). 8 See Kennedy, 554 U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 2641, 171 L.Ed.2d at 540 (holding death penalty for non-fatal rape of a child violates Eighth Amendment); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 568, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) (holding death penalty for juveniles under age eighteen violates Eighth Amendment); Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 17-18, 30-31, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (holding sentence of multiple personality twenty-five years to life for stealing three golf clubs under “three strikes” law not grossly disproportionate and therefore not cruel and unusual); Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S.

304, 321, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002) (holding death penalty for mentally retarded offenders violates Eighth Amendment); Harmelin v. Web Mining! Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 961, 995-96, 111 S.Ct. Theories Of Attachment! 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (holding mandatory sentence of web mining life without parole for possessing 672 grams of define social cocaine not cruel and unusual). 9 In felony cases where the applicable statute does not specify a mandatory sentence, the sentencing court first determines a basic sentence considering the nature and seriousness of the crime as committed, then considers aggravating and/or mitigating factors to arrive at web mining, a maximum sentence that may be higher or lower than the basic sentence, and finally determines whether any of the maximum sentence should be suspended in multiple personality cause arriving at a final sentence.

17-A M.R.S. Web Mining! ? 1252-C. 10 For defendants such as Gilman who assert that a mandatory sentence is too harsh as applied, the Maine Constitution gives the Governor the equitable power to “grant reprieves, commutations and of emotional intelligence, pardons” in web mining individual cases. Importance Of Emotional Intelligence! Me. Const. art. V, pt.

1, ? 11. 11 Discussing what would qualify as disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment, the Supreme Court used the hypothetical example of “a legislature making overtime parking a felony punishable by life imprisonment.” Ewing, 538 U.S. at web mining, 21, 123 S.Ct. 1179 (plurality opinion) (quotation marks omitted). 12 Title 29-A M.R.S. ? 2557 was repealed and replaced by P.L. Social! 2005, ch. 606, ?? A-10, A-11 (effective Aug. 23, 2006) (codified at 29-A M.R.S. Web Mining! ? 2557-A (2008)). The indictment against Gilman alleged that his most recent OUI conviction occurred on October 14, 2005.

Gautier’s conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) subjects him to the enhancement provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act. 590 F.Supp.2d 214. UNITED STATES of America, Eddie GAUTIER, Defendant. Criminal No.

06cr0036-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 23, 2008. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

Oscar Cruz, Jr., Timothy G. Watkins, Federal Defender’s Office District of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, for Eddie Gautier. William D. Weinreb, United States Attorney’s Office, John A. Cause! Wortmann, Jr., United States Attorney’s Office, Boston, MA, for web mining United States of America. GERTNER, District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Whether Gautier’s 2001 Crime of Resisting Arrest under Mass. Gen. 1. Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of § 32B Is a Violent. 2. Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of § 32B Is a Violent. B. Whether the 1998 Juvenile Offenses Were Committed on Different. 2. Whether the Inquiry Is Limited, to Shepard-approved Source. Three years ago, Boston police found a badly rusted gun and ammunition in the pocket of defendant Eddie Gautier (“Gautier”) one night in Roxbury.

The offense stemmed from a night of after Essay drunken carousing; the gun was completely inoperable.1 Though he was originally arrested by state officers, possession of an inoperable gun did not constitute a crime under state law. The federal government took up the case, charging Gautier with being a felon in possession of web mining a firearm, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), because of his prior record. His prior convictions include two armed robberies from 1998, when he was 16, and a resisting arrest charge from 2001, when he was 20. (He is presently 27.) The Guideline sentencing range for Gautier, assuming a guilty plea, was 57-71 months. But the government wanted more punishment for Gautier. It contended that these convictions compelled the application of a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). See § 924(e) (applying the beggars opera, penalty to web mining, defendants with at importance intelligence, least three previous convictions for violent felonies committed on separate occasions). I disagree.

In passing the ACCA, “Congress focused its efforts on career offenders— those who commit a large number of fairly serious crimes as their means of livelihood, and who, because they possess weapons, present at least a potential threat of web mining harm to multiple, persons.” Taylor v. Web Mining! United States, 495 U.S. 575, 587-88, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). Gautier’s criminal history consists of six episodes over define capitalism, ten years; two occurred when he was 16 and two others were marijuana offenses.2 The. predicate offenses for the ACCA enhancement are the two serious juvenile offenses, and resisting.

After two rounds of briefing and two sentencing hearings, I found that Gautier is not an armed career criminal under the terms of the statute. First, his resisting arrest conviction does not constitute a “violent felony” within the meaning of the ACCA. Second, and in the alternative, court records were ambiguous on the question of whether his 1998 offenses were “committed on occasions different from one another” as the statute requires. As a result, Gautier lacks the web mining, requisite three predicate offenses and the mandatory minimum does not apply. Accordingly, I sentenced Gautier to 57 months’ incarceration, in effect the Guideline felon in possession sentence, and three years’ supervised release, with a number of special requirements. This memorandum reflects the factual and importance intelligence, legal bases for that sentence. On the night of January 6, 2006, Eddie Gautier had come to web mining, the Archdale Housing Project to visit his mother. He decided to Self-Perception after Undergoing, meet four friends who were out celebrating two of their birthdays. About 10:30 p.m., two Boston police officers patrolling the web mining, Archdale Housing Project in an unmarked police car approached the group. One of Gautier’s friends, Salome Cabrera, peered into summarise the vehicle and made movements toward his waistband.

The officers exited the car, badges displayed, and web mining, walked to Cabrera. Cabrera then allegedly shouted “get the burner” (slang for gun), a comment Gautier claimed he did not hear, and the police responded by drawing their weapons on of attachment the group. They arrested and searched all five, finding a .38 caliber gun loaded with three rounds of ammunition in Gautier’s jacket pocket. An examination later revealed that the gun was completely inoperable.3. Gautier was transferred to federal custody on web mining February 8, 2006, and indicted on February 15, 2006, on one count of felon in possession of summarise of attachment a firearm and one count of web mining felon in possession of ammunition, both pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Subsequent to his arrest, he agreed to speak to federal agents and police investigators, admitted to possessing the gun, and divulged where it had come from. Indeed, according to his counsel, the defendant repeatedly offered to plead guilty to the charge, but was advised against it because of the cause, possibility of an ACCA minimum mandatory sentence of 15 years. Counsel for Gautier sought a pre-plea Pre Sentence Report (“PSR”). When the pre-plea PSR concluded that an ACCA enhancement was required, the defendant felt obliged to go to trial. At trial, he fully admitted that he possessed a firearm and that he had a prior felony conviction. His defense was that he had picked up the gun and held it momentarily, to keep it from a group of younger, intoxicated friends in a dangerous area of Boston.

The jury rejected his claim, convicting him of both counts on July 18, 2008. He has been incarcerated since his arrest on January 6, 2006. At the first sentencing hearing on web mining October 15, I asked the government to brief whether resisting arrest qualifies as an ACCA predicate, an issue raised in the defendant’s objections to summarise of attachment, the presentence report. On that date, I also raised sua sponte the web mining, issue of Essay about Evolution Gangster and America whether the juvenile. offenses Gautier committed in 1998 were clearly separate predicates. At the final sentencing hearing on December 15, 2008, after reviewing the parties’ submissions, I concluded that the ACCA enhancement was not warranted, principally because of the resisting arrest conviction but based on alternative findings concerning the web mining, two 1998 convictions, as well.

Gautier’s conviction for summarise of attachment being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) subjects him to the enhancement provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Web Mining! That statute provides: In the case of a person who violates section 922(g) of this title and has three previous convictions by importance intelligence, any court referred to in section 922(g)(1) of web mining this title for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both, committed on personality disorder occasions different from web mining one another, such person shall be fined under this title and Applicant’s Interview Essay, imprisoned not less than fifteen years…. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Web Mining! Gautier’s sentencing memorandum and recent Supreme Court decisions raise two potential obstacles to the applicability of the sentencing enhancement: First, Gautier’s conviction for importance of emotional resisting arrest may not be a “violent felony” under the ACCA. Second, the government may have difficulty establishing, on the basis of web mining source material deemed appropriate by the Supreme Court, that the define, 1998 offenses were “committed on web mining occasions different from capitalism one another.” A. Whether Gautier’s 2001 Crime of Resisting Arrest under Mass.

Gen. Web Mining! Laws Ch. 268, § 32B Is a Violent Felony. The ACCA defines “violent felony” as any crime punishable for a term exceeding one year that “(i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another; or (ii) is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). Courts are obliged to apply a categorical approach to determining whether a criminal offense is beggars opera a violent felony; that is, they look to the statutory definition of the web mining, prior offense and not to the facts underlying the define social capitalism, conviction. See Taylor, 495 U.S. at web mining, 600, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143.

Put simply, the issue is what the defendant was convicted of, or what he pled to, or what he admitted in the sentencing proceeding, not what he actually did. United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 16 (D.Mass.2002).4 Where such a substantial enhancement is involved. as with the social, ACCA, the case law expressly cautions courts against engaging in a post hoc archeological dig of prior convictions to determine what really happened. Problems of web mining interpretation arise when a state statute on which the predicate charge was based encompasses both violent felonies, which may qualify for ACCA treatment, and nonviolent felonies, which do not. In such a case, while the sentencing judge “may not hold a minitrial on personality cause the particular facts underlying the prior offense,” see United States v. Dueno, 171 F.3d 3, 5 (1st Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Damon, 127 F.3d 139, 144 (1st Cir.1997); United States v. Web Mining! Meader, 118 F.3d 876, 882 (1st Cir.1997)), he or she may “peek beneath the coverlet” of the multiple personality, formal language to ascertain whether the conviction was for a violent or a nonviolent crime, see United States v. Winter, 22 F.3d 15, 18 (1st Cir.1994). The question, now unequivocally answered by the Supreme Court in Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005), is web mining how far that “peek” can go. “Not very far, is the answer.” United States v. Shepard, 125 F.Supp.2d 562, 569 (D.Mass.2000) (citing Taylor, 495 U.S. at 600-02, 110 S.Ct. 2143; Damon, 127 F.3d at 142-46.) If the Applicant’s Undergoing Employment Interview, defendant was convicted after a trial, the court is permitted to consider what the jury instructions suggested about the verdict. When a defendant’s conviction resulted from web mining a guilty plea rather than trial, those sources include the charging document, the plea agreement, a transcript of the plea colloquy, any facts confirmed by the defendant at sentencing, and Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing, any comparable judicial record.

See Shepard, 544 U.S. at 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254. Finally, if the relevant facts contained in the PSR are uncontested, the web mining, court may consider these as further admissions by define social capitalism, the defendant. See Dueno, 171 F.3d at 7; United States v. Harris, 964 F.2d 1234,1236-37 (1st Cir.1992). Defendant claims that the Massachusetts resisting arrest statute embodies both violent and nonviolent offenses and, further, that nothing in the record of Gautier’s 2002 plea to the charge establishes that the web mining, plea was to the violent version of the Essay Evolution of the and America, felony. Web Mining! Under the about Evolution of the, Massachusetts statute, a person is guilty of the offense if he knowingly prevents or attempts to prevent an web mining officer from effecting an define capitalism arrest by “(1) using or threatening to use physical force or violence against the police officer or another; or (2) using any other means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to such police officer or another.” Mass. Gen. Laws ch.

268, § 32B(a). The government correctly points out that Prong (1) of this definition clearly defines an ACCA violent felony, as it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i); see Gov’t Sent. Web Mining! Mem. 3 (document # 62). Prong (2) of the resisting arrest statute, however, does not. Importantly, there exists no tape or transcript of Gautier’s colloquy, no plea agreement, and no other record indicating which type of resisting arrest Gautier admitted. Applicant’s Self-Perception After Employment Essay! While the web mining, PSR reviewed the police report of the offense, Gautier did not adopt the facts as true. Essay Evolution! Rather, he interposed a Shepard challenge to web mining, any “peek” at the underlying facts not comprised by the plea colloquy. Accordingly, as in Shepard, the criminal complaint to which Gautier pleaded is the only extant evidence I may consider, and it simply lists the offense and provides its full statutory definition.5 As there is no evidence that Gautier specifically pleaded guilty to the Prong (1) version of resisting arrest and as the. statute is multiple personality structured in web mining the disjunctive, the government must establish that Prong (2) defines a violent felony under the beggars opera, ACCA.

It cannot. 1. Web Mining! Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of § 32B Is a Violent Felony Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) By its own terms, the capitalism, Prong (2) definition of resisting arrest does not qualify as a violent felony under the first definition laid out in the ACCA. That is, the language “using any other means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to such police officer or another,” Mass Gen. Laws. ch. 268, § 32B(a), does not explicitly “ha[ve] as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i). Moreover, the fact that the Prong (1) definition of resisting arrest does contain such an element, coupled with Prong (2)’s specification of web mining resistance by define social, “other means,” suggests that Prong (2) does not involve such an web mining element by implication, either. 2. Whether the Crime Defined by Prong (2) of § 32B Is a Violent Felony Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)

If Prong (2) of the Massachusetts resisting arrest statute defines a violent felony for the armed career criminal mandatory minimum, it must do so under the second definition provided by the ACCA. Since resisting arrest is obviously not one of the capitalism, enumerated offenses—burglary, arson, extortion, or a crime that involves the use of web mining explosives—the inquiry focuses on what has been called the residual clause of the ACCA statute. See James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1591, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007). Beggars Opera! The issue is web mining whether resisting arrest “using any other means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury to such police officer or another,” in the language of the Massachusetts statute, Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 268, § 32B, “involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of Undergoing physical injury to another,” in web mining the language of the ACCA, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). At first pass, the question seems to answer itself, but the Supreme Court has required more than a textual comparison of the criminal statute and the ACCA under the residual clause.

In Begay v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008), in which the Supreme Court ruled that drunk driving was not a violent felony under the beggars opera, ACCA, Justice Breyer described a twostep process for determining whether a conviction is a “violent felony” under the web mining, residual provision of § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Where the offense in question is not one of those enumerated in the statute, a court must determine not only (1) whether that offense “involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another,” but also (2) whether the crime is “roughly similar, in kind as well as in degree of Essay about and America risk posed, to the” enumerated offenses. Id. at 1585. The latter step is critical here. It requires a court to decide whether the offense in web mining question typically involves “purposeful, violent, and aggressive behavior”—the defining feature of the enumerated offenses. The Court based the Begay test on the text of the summarise of attachment, ACCA, its legislative history, and its underlying purpose. As to text, the court noted that the presence of the enumerated offenses of web mining burglary, arson, extortion and crimes involving explosives “indicates that the statute covers only similar crimes, rather than every crime that `presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.’” Id. Of Emotional! Had Congress intended the statute to cover all crimes creating serious risk of injury, it would have omitted the examples. As to history, the Court noted that in 1986 “Congress rejected a broad proposal that would have covered every [such] offense.” Id. at 1586.

Finally, the Court noted that this interpretation served the ACCA’s purpose of web mining “punish[ing] only multiple cause a particular subset of offender, namely career criminals.” Id. at 1588: The listed crimes all typically involve purposeful, “violent,” and web mining, “aggressive” conduct…. That conduct is such that it makes [it] more likely that an offender, later possessing a gun, will use that gun deliberately to harm a victim…. Were we to read the statute without this distinction, its 15-year mandatory minimum sentence would apply to a host of crimes which, though dangerous, are not typically committed by those whom one normally labels “armed career criminals.” Id. at 1586-87 (citations omitted). In Begay, the define social, Court assumed without deciding that drunk driving involves conduct that “presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Id. at 1584. Even so, it held under the second step of the web mining, analysis that a conviction for driving under the multiple personality cause, influence (“DUI”) falls outside the scope of the residual clause because “[i]t is simply too unlike the provision’s listed examples for us to believe that Congress intended the provision to cover it.” Id. at 1584. Moreover, the Supreme Court has held that in conducting this analysis, courts need not analyze “every conceivable factual offense covered by a statute,” but rather should consider “the ordinary case” of the offense. James, 127 S.Ct. at web mining, 1597. In the Self-Perception Undergoing Interview, words of the First Circuit, I must evaluate the degree of risk posed by “the mine-run of conduct that falls within the heartland of the statute.” United States v. De Jesus, 984 F.2d 21, 24 (1st Cir.1993); see also United States v. Web Mining! Doe, 960 F.2d 221, 224-25 (1st Cir.1992) (holding that the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm is not a violent felony under the ACCA because risk of physical harm does not “often accompany[] the conduct that normally constitutes” the offense); United States v. Sacko, 178 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1999) (approving the district court’s understanding that it had to consider “what’s the typical, usual type of conduct” constituting statutory rape); Damon, 127 F.3d at 143 (holding that aggravated criminal mischief is a crime of violence “if and only if a serious potential risk of physical injury to another is a `normal, usual, or customary concomitant’ of the predicate offense”); Winter, 22 F.3d at 20 (“A categorical approach is not concerned with testing either the outer limits of statutory language or the myriad of possibilities girdled by that language; instead, a categorical approach is concerned with the usual type of conduct that the statute purports to proscribe.”). To determine the mine-run of conduct encompassed by Prong (2) of the resisting arrest statute, I examine its application in beggars opera the Massachusetts state courts.

There have been relatively few cases interpreting that part of the statute. Web Mining! In Commonwealth v. Theories Of Attachment! Grandison, 433 Mass. 135, 741 N.E.2d 25 (2001), the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the defendant’s stiffening his arms and pulling one away for a second to avoid being handcuffed constituted resisting arrest by web mining, a “means which creates a substantial risk of causing bodily injury” to the officers involved. Id. at 144-45, 741 N.E.2d 25. In Commonwealth v. Beggars Opera! Maylott, 65 Mass.App.Ct. 466, 841 N.E.2d 717 (2006), an web mining intermediate appellate court likewise held that a defendant resisted arrest under Prong (2) when he stiffened his arms and refused to put his hands behind his back.6 Id. at 468-69, 841 N.E.2d 717. In another case, a state court declined to. decide whether flight over fences without physical resistance constitutes resisting arrest under Prong (2) of the statutory definition. Beggars Opera! Commonwealth v. Grant, 71 Mass.

App.Ct. 205, 210 n. 2, 880 N.E.2d 820 (2008). These cases indicate that while Prong (1) of the web mining, resisting arrest statute covers the actual or threatened use of of emotional force, the mine-run of conduct criminalized by web mining, Prong (2) involves a lesser version of summarise theories of attachment “active, physical refusal to submit to the authority of the web mining, arresting officers”: paradigmatically, the multiple personality, stiffening of one’s arms to resist handcuffing. Maylott, 65 Mass.App. Ct. at 469, 841 N.E.2d 717.7. Under the first prong of the Begay analysis, I must determine whether the Prong (2) definition of resisting arrest “presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Stiffening one’s arms to prevent handcuffing, the usual conduct prosecuted under Prong (2), sometimes does and sometimes does not present a serious risk of web mining injury, and at least one court has suggested this inconsistency as a ground for finding that a criminal offense fails to satisfy this part of the test. See United States v. Urbano, No.

07-10160-01-MLB, 2008 WL 1995074, at multiple disorder, *2 (D.Kan. May 6, 2008) (holding on these grounds that fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer in a motor vehicle is not a “violent felony” for ACCA purposes) (“While an individual can, and often does, cause serious personal injury or death while attempting to flee from the police, the statute also charges behavior which would arguably not cause serious personal injury.”). In Grandison, however, the Supreme Judicial Court explained that resisting being handcuffed, and particularly pulling one’s arm free, is “[t]he type of resistance [that] could have caused one of the officers to be struck or otherwise injured, especially at the moment [the defendant] freed his arm.” 433 Mass. at web mining, 145, 741 N.E.2d 25. Even assuming arguendo that the conduct typically prosecuted under Prong (2) of the resisting arrest statute presents a serious potential risk of Self-Perception injury to another, that form of resisting arrest cannot fulfill the second part of the Begay test. The crime is not “roughly similar, in web mining kind as well as in degree of risk posed, to the” enumerated offenses. Summarise Theories Of Attachment! Begay, 128 S.Ct. at 1585. First, looking to the degree of risk: Even if the web mining, Grandison court is correct that stiffening one’s arms and Applicant’s Undergoing Employment, pulling away present a serious risk of harm to another, the degree of web mining that risk does not approach that posed by Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Employment, burglary, arson, extortion, or crime involving use of explosives. The Supreme Court has explained that burglary presents a high risk of web mining violence due to “the possibility of social capitalism a face-to-face confrontation between the burglar and web mining, a third party … who comes to investigate.” James, 127 S.Ct. at 1594; see also United States v. Winn, 364 F.3d 7, 11 (1st Cir.2004) (describing this as the cause, “powder keg” rationale). The element of surprise that spooks a burglar into personal violence is not present where police are already in web mining the process of arresting a suspect.8 It is. measurably less likely that injury will result from the stiffening of one’s arms than that it will result from a burglary, the disorder cause, setting of a structure on fire, unlawfully demanding property or services through threat of harm, or the detonation of explosive devices.9.

Second, looking to the “in kind” test, whether Prong (2) resistance is similar in kind to the enumerated offenses: This inquiry requires me to determine whether the offense involves “purposeful, violent, and aggressive behavior.” In Begay, the web mining, Court held that drunk driving does not fulfill the importance, test because the offender does not possess the purpose or intentional aggression that characterizes the enumerated offenses. 128 S.Ct. at 1586-87 (“[S]tatutes that forbid driving under the web mining, influence … criminaliz[e] conduct in beggars opera respect to web mining, which the offender need not have had any criminal intent at all.”); see also United States v. Gray, 535 F.3d 128, 131-32 (2d Cir.2008) (holding that reckless endangerment is not a crime of violence because it is summarise not intentional). But as the First Circuit recognized in United States v. Williams, 529 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2008), some crimes fall “neither within the safe harbor of offenses with limited scienter requirements and uncertain consequences (like DUI …), nor among those that have deliberate violence as a necessary element or even as an almost inevitable concomitant.” Id. at 7 (citation omitted). Web Mining! Prong (2) resistance is such a crime. The First Circuit recently explained that “all three types of conduct—i.e., purposeful, violent and aggressive—are necessary for importance of emotional intelligence a predicate crime to web mining, qualify as a `violent felony’ under ACCA.” United States v. Herrick, 545 F.3d 53, 58-59 (1st Cir.2008). Multiple Personality! The court also provided more precise meanings for those characteristics. It explained: The Supreme Court … use[d] “purposeful” interchangeably with “intentional.” [Begay, 128 S.Ct.] at 1587-88. Perhaps because it is web mining common sense that a DUI is of emotional not violent or aggressive in an ordinary sense, the Supreme Court did not define those terms or explain in other than conclusory terms why a DUI was not violent or aggressive. We note, therefore, that aggressive may be defined as “tending toward or exhibiting aggression,” which in web mining turn is defined as “a forceful action or procedure (as an unprovoked attack) esp. when intended to dominate or master.” Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 24 (11th ed. 2003).

Violence may be defined as “marked by extreme force or sudden intense activity.” Id. at 58. Applying these definitions, the court held that a conviction under a Wisconsin statute for theories homicide by negligent operation of web mining a motor vehicle was not a “crime of violence” under the career offender sentencing guidelines.10 Id. at 59. While the offense undoubtedly presented a serious potential risk of potential injury to. another, it was not purposeful or aggressive enough to be similar “in kind” to the enumerated offenses. Summarise! Id. A similar conclusion obtains here.

To be sure, the web mining, Prong (2) form of resisting arrest is purposeful in that a defendant who stiffens or pulls away his arm certainly intends to do so (though he may not intend to expose others to risk of injury). It is Self-Perception Undergoing Interview differently purposeful, however, from the interstate transport of web mining a minor for prostitution, which the First Circuit held in Williams constituted a “crime of violence” under the career offender provision of the beggars opera, sentencing guidelines. 529 F.3d at 7-8. A defendant who prostitutes minors “is aware of the risks that the prostituted minor will face” and the risk of harm is “easily foreseen by the defendant,” id. at 7; a defendant who stiffens his arm to avoid handcuffing exhibits no such intent or clairvoyance that harm will result to those around him. Moreover, Prong (2) resistance cannot be said to approach the web mining, aggression or violence of the enumerated offenses. See, e.g., Taylor, 495 U.S. at 581, 110 S.Ct. 2143 (noting that Congress considered burglary “one of the `most damaging crimes to society’ because it involves ‘invasion of [victims'] homes or workplaces, violation of their privacy, and importance of emotional intelligence, loss of web mining their most personal and valued possessions’” (quoting H.R.Rep. No.

98-1073, at 1, 3, 1984 U.S.Code Cong. #038; Admin.News 3661, 3663)). Arm-stiffening is summarise theories not characterized by the force or domination impulse that the web mining, First Circuit has held defines aggression, and theories, it lacks the web mining, extreme force and sudden intenseness required by the court’s definition of violence. Beggars Opera! See Herrick, 545 F.3d at 60. Nor does it resemble those offenses previously held by the First Circuit and web mining, the district courts in its jurisdiction to constitute violent felonies or crimes of violence under the residual clause. See United States v. Walter, 434 F.3d 30 (1st Cir.2006) (manslaughter); United States v. Sherwood, 156 F.3d 219 (1st Cir.1998) (child molestation); United States v. Importance! Fernandez, 121 F.3d 777 (1st Cir.1997) (assault and battery on a police officer); United States v. Web Mining! Schofield, 114 F.3d 350 (1st Cir.1997) (breaking and entering a commercial or public building); United States v. Of Attachment! De Jesus, 984 F.2d 21 (1st Cir.1993) (larceny from a person); United States v. Fiore, 983 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1992) (breaking and entering a commercial or public building); United States v. Patterson, 882 F.2d 595 (1st Cir.1989) (unauthorized entry of the premises of another); United States v. Cadieux, 350 F.Supp.2d 275 (D.Me.2004) (indecent assault and battery on web mining a child under 14); United States v. Sanford, 327 F.Supp.2d 54 (D.Me.2004) (assault and battery); Mooney v. United States, 2004 WL 1571643 (D.Me. Apr. 30, 2004) (breaking and importance of emotional intelligence, entering a commercial building); United States v. Lepore, 304 F.Supp.2d 183, 189 (D.Mass.2004) (indecent assault and battery on a person over web mining, 14 years old).

And those cases predated Begay, when the standard for finding an offense to be a “violent felony” was easier to satisfy. Disorder Cause! In light of the difference in aggression and violence between resisting arrest and the offenses previously held to be ACCA predicates, Prong (2) resistance does not resemble the enumerated offenses in the “`way or manner’ in which it produces” risk of injury. Begay, 128 S.Ct. at 1586. To be sure, some courts—including within this district—have found that resisting arrest is an ACCA predicate, but all of these cases predate Begay.11 Begay. “charted a new course in interpreting the critical violent felony definition of the Armed Career Criminal Act.” Williams, 529 F.3d at 6. Significantly, in a recent post-Begay case in this court, Judge Zobel rejected the government’s contention that a prior conviction under the Massachusetts resisting arrest statute constituted a “crime of violence” under the web mining, career offender guidelines. United States v. Kristopher Gray, No. 07-10337-RWZ, 2008 WL 2563378 (D.Mass. Jun. 24, 2008) (sentencing defendant without written opinion to twenty-four months imprisonment for conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)). In another post-Begay case on summarise theories resisting arrest, the U.S.

District Court for the District of Kansas held that the web mining, crime of fleeing and eluding an multiple personality officer is not a crime of web mining violence because “the statute also charges behavior which would arguably not cause serious personal injury” and because resisting arrest “is not similar to the listed crimes set forth” in § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Beggars Opera! Urbano, 2008 WL 1995074, at *2. Importantly, the web mining, district court so held despite the existence of a 2005 precedent concluding that the resisting arrest was a crime of violence. The court explained its about-face as required by Begay. Id. at *2. In light of the Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Begay, then, I find that the Prong (2) version of summarise theories resisting arrest is web mining not a “violent felony” under the ACCA.

The usual conduct underlying a conviction under that definition involves the stiffening of one’s arms, not the application of force to another. Even assuming that such conduct creates a serious potential risk of physical injury, it certainly does not resemble the enumerated offenses either in degree of risk or in kind. The state court criminal complaint charges Gautier with the full definition of resisting arrest. Because the government cannot establish that he pleaded to Prong (1) rather than to Self-Perception after Undergoing, Prong (2)—as it must— it cannot look to this conviction for a qualifying violent felony. Gautier has at web mining, most two statutory predicates—too few to trigger the define, fifteen-year mandatory minimum.

B. Whether the 1998 Juvenile Offenses Were Committed on Different Occasions. 1. Legal Standard. That Gautier’s resisting arrest conviction is not a violent felony is enough to preclude the web mining, application of the ACCA enhancement. In the alternative, I find the enhancement is also flawed for a second reason: his 1998 juvenile offenses were not “committed on multiple personality cause occasions different from one another” as required to constitute independent predicate offenses.12 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The First Circuit has held that “the `occasions’ inquiry requires a case-by-case examination of the totality of the circumstances.” United States v. Stearns, 387 F.3d 104, 108 (1st Cir.2004). Factors in that examination include the “identity of the victim; the type of web mining crime; the time interval between the Essay, crimes; the location of the crimes; the continuity vel non of the defendant’s conduct; and/or the apparent motive for the crimes.” Id. As one would expect from web mining Congress’ use of the word “occasion,” the First Circuit has focused on the element of Self-Perception after Employment Interview Essay time. The Stearns court summarized that the statute distinguishes between, on the one hand, “a time interval during which defendant successfully has completed his first crime, safely escaped, and which affords defendant a `breather,’ viz., a period (however brief) which is devoid of criminal activity and in which he may contemplate whether or not to commit the second crime,” and on the other, “a time lapse which does not mark the endpoint of the first crime, but merely the web mining, natural consequence of a continuous course of extended criminal conduct.”13 387 F.3d at 108 (defendant who burglarized the same warehouse on importance consecutive days had committed offenses on web mining different occasions); see also United States v. Ramirez, No.

CR-05-71-B-W, 2007 WL 4571143, at *6 (D.Me. Summarise Of Attachment! Dec. 21, 2007) (two robberies committed over five weeks apart against different victims in different locations occurred on different occasions); United States v. Mastera, 435 F.3d 56, 60 (1st Cir.2006) (stalking and breaking and entering occurred on different occasions because they were committed on consecutive days); United States v. Mollo, No. 97-1922, 1997 WL 781582, at *1 (1st Cir. Dec. 17, 1997) (per curiam) (defendant who robbed liquor store in Greenwich and web mining, thirty minutes later robbed variety store in Stamford had committed offenses on disorder cause different occasions); Harris, 964 F.2d at 1237 (two assault and battery offenses qualified as separate predicate offenses because they occurred two months apart, even though they involved the same victim and web mining, defendant was convicted and sentenced for both on the same day); United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 497 (1st Cir.1988) (armed robberies of different drugstores on consecutive days occurred on different occasions for the purposes of the ACCA, even though defendant received concurrent sentences).

2. Whether the Inquiry Is Limited to Shepard-approved Source Material. Again, in order to theories of attachment, apply the above legal standard to the facts of Gautier’s prior felony convictions, I must answer an antecedent question: from what sources may I glean those facts? As explained above, the Supreme Court has directed courts to apply a “categorical approach” to web mining, determining whether a prior conviction qualifies as a “violent felony” and thus predicate offense under the Essay Evolution of the and America, ACCA. Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 588, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). In the case of a guilty plea, the Court has limited district courts to “the terms of the charging document, the web mining, terms of Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Essay a plea agreement or transcript of colloquy between judge and web mining, defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant, or to some comparable judicial record of this information.” Shepard, 544 U.S. at 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254. The issue I confront here is whether this same source restriction applies to my consideration of whether two offenses were “committed on occasions different from Employment Essay one another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The First Circuit has never ruled on this issue. In a pre-Shepard case, the court “express[ed] no opinion” on the lower court’s citation of Taylor for the proposition “that district courts normally should not look beyond the indictment when determining whether a prior conviction is the type countable under the web mining, ACCA.” Stearns, 387 F.3d at 107.

In that case, the defendant sought an evidentiary hearing to develop his argument that two of his predicate offenses should be counted as occurring on one occasion. The district court interpreted Taylor to social capitalism, forbid such an involved inquiry and denied his motion, but because the defendant accepted the web mining, judge’s ruling without objection, the First Circuit held he could not raise the issue on appeal. Define Social Capitalism! In a post-Shepard case, United States v. Walter, 434 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2006), the First Circuit again declined to resolve the web mining, issue. The defendant argued it was error for the district court to use facts gleaned from police reports and described in the PSR to find that two drug offenses disposed of on the same day were in fact “committed on capitalism occasions different from one another.” Id. at 38. The court of appeals opted not to address his argument, finding that even counting the contested offenses as one the defendant had enough predicates to trigger the ACCA. Id. at 40.

At least three circuit courts have held that the source restriction applies to web mining, the occasions inquiry. The Fourth Circuit held in Undergoing Employment United States v. Thompson, 421 F.3d 278 (4th Cir.2005), that the web mining, “ACCA’s use of the term `occasion’ requires recourse only to data normally found in summarise of attachment conclusive judicial records, such as the date and location of an offense, upon which Taylor and Shepard say we may rely.” Id. at web mining, 286 (upholding trial judge’s reliance on the PSR to of emotional intelligence, find that three burglaries occurred on web mining separate occasions where that information was derived from Applicant’s after Employment Interview Shepard-approved sources such as indictments and where defendant never objected to the details in the PSR); see also United States v. Williams, 223 Fed.Appx. 280, 283 (4th Cir. 2007) (assuming that the occasions inquiry can be conducted by reference to Shepard-approved sources only). In United States v. Fuller, 453 F.3d 274 (5th Cir.2006), the Fifth Circuit vacated an ACCA enhancement where the court could not establish on the basis of Shepard-approved material that the web mining, predicate offenses were committed on different occasions. Id. at 279; see also United States v. Bookman, 197 Fed. Appx. 349, 350 (5th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (vacating defendant’s sentence where the sequence of beggars opera his predicate offenses was not established by Shepard-appropriate material). The Tenth Circuit has held that a criminal sentence enhanced by the ACCA should be vacated and remanded when it is unclear whether the sentencing court limited itself to Shepard sources in determining whether the defendant’s prior crimes were committed on different occasions. See United States v. Harris, 447 F.3d 1300, 1305 (10th Cir.2006); United States v. Web Mining! Taylor, 413 F.3d 1146, 1157-58 (10th Cir.

2005). Multiple Personality Disorder! Several district courts have come to the same conclusion. See, e.g., United States v. Web Mining! Carr, No. 2:06-CR-14-FL-1, 2008 WL 4641346, at *2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2008) (limiting the occasions inquiry to facts available in Shepard-approved material), including at least one court in a circuit that disavows this application of the Shepard source restriction, see Watts v. United States, Nos. 8:04-cr-314-24MAP, 8:07-cv-665-T-24MAP, 2007 WL 1839474, at *4 (M.D.Fla. Intelligence! June 26, 2007) (accepting the applicability of Shepard and holding that the trial court “properly reviewed the charging documents to determine that the web mining, offenses occurred on three separate occasions”). By contrast, three circuits have held that the source restriction applies only to of emotional, the violent felony inquiry and not to the occasions inquiry. The Sixth Circuit has been most emphatic: “All of our opinions on this issue have involved consideration of the specific facts underlying the prior convictions.

Indeed, we cannot imagine how such a determination could be made without reference to the underlying facts of the predicate offenses.” United States v. Web Mining! Thomas, 211 F.3d 316, 318 n. 3 (6th Cir. 2000). The Seventh Circuit has likewise allowed sentencing judges to venture beyond the decisional documents envisioned by Taylor, reasoning that these only rarely provide the details that reveal whether offenses were committed on separate occasions, see United States v. Hudspeth, 42 F.3d 1015, 1019 n. 3 (7th Cir.1994) (holding “[a]s a practical matter” that Taylor does not restrict the occasions inquiry), and the Eleventh Circuit has held on the same grounds that the question is “unsuited to a categorical approach,” United States v. Richardson, 230 F.3d 1297, 1300 (11th Cir. 2000). Importantly, however, these cases came down before the multiple personality cause, Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to the categorical approach in Shepard. But see United States v. Web Mining! Hendrix, 509 F.3d 362, 375-76 (7th Cir. Multiple Cause! 2007) (affirming the district court’s use of the PSR to web mining, determine that defendant had three predicates from different occasions for the ACCA).

I find that the former approach is more faithful to the Supreme Court’s rulings in Taylor and Shepard and makes sense in terms of the application of the very severe ACCA. As I explained in my remand opinion in Shepard, the Supreme Court’s categorical approach “caution[s] the define social, judge against becoming embroiled in a `daunting’ factual inquiry about what had actually happened at web mining, the time of the importance of emotional, state offense.” United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 21 (D.Mass.2002). The central question in identifying countable predicate offenses where the defendant did not go to trial is “what did the defendant plead to in the state court?” Id. at 17. Where a defendant has not been found guilty by web mining, a jury, it is only fair to of emotional, punish him for the prior conduct that he actually admits, either by pleading to the facts alleged or failing to object to them at sentencing.14. In light of the web mining, Supreme Court’s caution in this area and the judgment of the courts of appeals, I find that I am limited to “the statutory definition, charging document, written plea agreement, transcript of plea colloquy, and any explicit factual finding by the trial judge to which the defendant assented” in determining whether the defendants prior offenses were committed “on occasions different from one another.” Id. at importance intelligence, 16. 3. The 1998 Offenses. In the instant case, the only Shepard-approved sources available to me in deciding whether the 1998 offenses occurred on different occasions are the web mining, state court indictments and Gautier’s plea tenders. Beggars Opera! The statutory definitions contain no elements that bear on the sequence of the offenses.

The government can produce no plea colloquy transcripts from those cases. And no additional underlying facts were incorporated into the PSR and adopted by the defendant. PSR ¶¶ 35-36 (repeating the details provided in web mining the indictments and specifically stating that police reports were not received). While the plea tenders merely contain the defendant’s and prosecutor’s dispositional requests, several things are evident from the face of the indictments. In Suffolk Superior Court case no. 98-10175, the grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Gautier with armed robbery (knife) and assault and battery against a victim named “F.L.” In Suffolk Superior Court case no. 98-10177, the of attachment, grand jury returned a five-count indictment charging Gautier with assault with a dangerous weapon (knife and/or gun) with intent to steal a motor vehicle; armed robbery (knife and/or gun); kidnaping; assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shod foot); and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (water bottle) against web mining, one “E.M.” Both indictments alleged that he committed each offense on January 8, 1998.

The indictments indicate that on January 8, 1998, Gautier assaulted F.L. and that on the same day, he tried try to steal E.M.’s car, robbed him of $25.00, and Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview, confined or imprisoned him against web mining, his will. Clearly, the defendant committed these crimes against different individuals. But the type of crime at issue here (armed robbery) and the apparent motive (monetary gain) were identical as to both victims. Social Capitalism! Crucially, specific as they are, the charging documents do not reveal the location of the crimes, the web mining, time interval between the offenses, or the continuity of the conduct. Define Capitalism! It is web mining therefore not “possible to of emotional, discern the web mining, point at which the first offense is completed and the second offense begins.” United States v. Beggars Opera! Martin, 526 F.3d 926, 939 (6th Cir.2008). Indeed, as far as the indictments are concerned, these attacks could have been simultaneous.

Finally, I consider whether the mere fact that the offenses against F.L. and those against E.M. were grouped and charged in separate indictments suggests that Gautier committed them on different occasions. It is well settled that there is no one-to-one correspondence between indictments. and predicate offenses. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 181 Fed. Appx. 969, 971 (11th Cir.2006) (noting that while “the three qualifying offenses must be temporally distinct,” separate indictments are not required); United States v. Howard, 918 F.2d 1529, 1538 (11th Cir. 1990). As such, courts have found that the existence of separate indictments is not dispositive evidence that the crimes alleged therein were committed on different occasions. See, e.g., United States v. Alcantara, 43 Fed.Appx. 884, 886-87 (6th Cir.2002) (three separate indictments for web mining offenses all committed “on or before November 30? did not establish that the beggars opera, offenses occurred on “occasions different from one another” for the purpose of the ACCA); cf.

United States v. Goetchius, 369 F.Supp.2d 13, 16-17 #038; n. 6 (D.Me. 2005) (holding that Shepard’s source restriction governs determinations of whether prior crimes were “related” under the web mining, Sentencing Guidelines criminal history provisions, then ruling that the existence of Applicant’s Essay separate indictments did not mean they were unrelated). This conclusion applies with the same force to the instant case. Prosecutors have wide discretion as to the form of criminal charging. Under Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 9(a)(2), the Commonwealth “may” charge two or more related offenses in the same indictment, and it may not. The fact that the Suffolk County district attorney charged Gautier’s 1998 offenses in separate indictments, then, says nothing about how distinct they were. As no Shepard-approved material establishes that Gautier experienced “a period … devoid of criminal activity and in which he may contemplate whether or not to commit the second crime,” Stearns, 387 F.3d at 108, I cannot fairly conclude that he committed the armed robberies “on occasions different from one another.” By the web mining, terms of the ACCA itself, the 1998 offenses do not provide more than a single predicate. Self-Perception After! This result provides a secondary reason the mandatory minimum does not apply to Gautier.15.

IV. THE SENTENCE. A. The Guidelines Computation. I accept the presentence report computation of the Guidelines to this extent: the base offense level is web mining 24 under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2). While Gautier argues that he should get a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility under § # E1.1(a) and (b), I disagree at least as Guidelines interpretation is Applicant’s Self-Perception Undergoing Interview concerned.

I consider this issue in connection with the web mining, 3553(a) factors (see below). While the government argues that the defendant committed perjury during his trial testimony, I do not agree and will not enhance under § 3C1.1. I also agree that Gautier’s criminal history is category IV under § 4A1.1(d) and (e). The Guidelines range, then, is beggars opera 63-78 months. B. Web Mining! 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Factors. Gautier argues for a 48-month sentence because the gun was inoperable, because he took possession of it as a safety measure to avoid what he believed to be imminent harm to others, and because he has turned his life around while in multiple personality custody.

I can find no clear rationale for a variance on web mining these bases. Nevertheless, I find a 57-month sentence sufficient but not greater than necessary to achieve the purposes of 3553(a) for capitalism the following reasons: 1. Nature and Circumstances of the Offense. Gautier claims he took the gun from his friends because they were drunk and behaving recklessly. Even assuming that to be true, it plainly does not exonerate him, as the jury found. Given his record, he should not have put himself in a position where the offense was even possible: in the Archdale projects, with drunk and web mining, disorderly compatriots, so much as touching a firearm. Nevertheless, I believe this was a last minute and momentary possession, not something he sought out at the time, or did regularly. 2. Deterrence; Public Safety. Gautier cooperated with the authorities from the outset. Capitalism! He told them what he knew, offered to web mining, plead guilty, but was advised otherwise by his counsel. Multiple Personality Disorder Cause! He went to trial on the advice of his attorney to preserve his challenge to web mining, the ACCA.16 He plainly took responsibility for what he had done, though not in the narrow way in which this concept has been interpreted under the Sentencing Guidelines.

I found Gautier contrite at his lengthy allocution during sentencing, an affect fully consistent with his demeanor during his trial. He has faced substantial challenges in his life. Gautier did not know his father as he was murdered when Gautier was four years old. His mother remarried and the family then relocated from beggars opera Puerto Rico, his birthplace, to Providence, Rhode Island, and then to Boston after a fire damaged their home. This relationship did not last, according to Gautier’s mother, because her husband was abusive. When Gautier was 12, his mother sent him back to Puerto Rico to live with his paternal grandmother because of his discipline problems. He stayed there until age 16 when he returned to Massachusetts. Web Mining! DYS records reveal that at age 16 Gautier witnessed a good friend being stabbed in the chest and cradled his friend as he died.

After this incident another good friend. died of complications relating to social capitalism, pneumonia. Soon thereafter, he was committed to DYS for a number of offenses. He was released on parole at age 17, but was in and out of custody until age 21 due to the offenses described above. Notwithstanding these difficulties, Gautier secured a high school diploma while at DYS and received asbestos removal training upon web mining his release. And while he has never been married, he had a longtime relationship with Shariffa Edwards, resulting in the birth of their son Zion Edwards Gautier. Personality Disorder Cause! The couple parted company when Gautier was incarcerated. While in prison, Gautier has been intensely involved in ministry work, assisting fellow inmates and web mining, studying with the beggars opera, prison chaplain. Gautier spoke movingly of this work. He indicated to Probation that he hopes to attend a college where he can continue these studies.

Gautier thus presents a mixed picture: he has important strengths that might deter him from future offending, but also a track record of missteps that plainly require both punishment and assistance. Gautier has made efforts to web mining, give his life structure, but needs more. I have required Probation to devise a recommended plan for Essay Evolution Gangster and America him, both as a recommendation for the Bureau of Prisons during the period of his incarceration and as a template for his supervised release afterwards. Studies suggest the significance on web mining recidivism of a consistent plan, beginning in prison and Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview Essay, extending into reentry. Laurie Robinson #038; Jeremy Travis, 12 Fed. S.R. Web Mining! 258 (2000). In addition to that plan, as a condition of supervised release, Gautier is to Applicant’s Interview Essay, speak at web mining, high schools or to other young men identified by Probation as “at risk.” I believe that a sentence of 57 months is appropriate here for of attachment the following reasons. It marks the low end of the Guidelines range that he would have faced, 57-71 months, had he been charged with felon in possession, without the ACCA enhancement, and pled to that offense as he had wanted to do.17 That sentence combines the Guidelines’ values with those of § 3553(a). 1. The ballistics report observed that “a portion of the web mining, trigger guard is broken off, the ejector rod collar is out of Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment place, the web mining, ejector rod spring is defective, the ejector rod will not secure the cylinder in the closed position, the cylinder hand is not making contact with the cylinder, and neither the theories, trigger nor the web mining, hammer can be drawn back to the firing position.

There is rust on the cylinder, the ejector, the about Evolution Gangster, crane, and the trigger. Web Mining! This weapon cannot be fired in its present condition and in my opinion it would require extensive work and new parts to return this weapon to a state in which it can be discharged.” Boston Police Ballistic Unit Case Notes, Def.’s Sent. Mem., Ex. B (document # 60-2). 2. His prior convictions include offenses committed in the course of two armed robberies perpetrated on the same day in 1998; marijuana possession and distribution in 2001; resisting arrest and trespassing in 2001; possession with intent to define, distribute marijuana in 2005; and attempted breaking #038; entering and possession of web mining burglarious tools (screwdriver) in 2004. See Pre-sentence Report (“PSR”) ¶¶ 35-40. 3. Gautier made incriminating statements during the booking procedure, including “You got me with the burner, I’m gonna take a plea and do a year” and “That’s a separate charge? Of course it’s gonna have bullets in Evolution of the it, it’s a gun.” He waived his Miranda rights and web mining, made similar statements during a police interview. 4. In United States v. Shepard, 125 F.Supp.2d 562, 569-70 (D.Mass.2000), I held that a sentencing judge could not look to summarise, any underlying police reports or complaint applications that had not been adopted by the defendant when determining whether prior convictions were “burglaries” under the ACCA. The First Circuit reversed, holding that police reports could be considered if they “constituted sufficiently reliable evidence of the government and the defendant’s shared belief that the defendant was pleading guilty” to a generically violent crime.

United States v. Shepard, 231 F.3d 56, 70 (1st Cir.2000). I then concluded that the central question was, what did the web mining, defendant plead to in state court, and that the police reports did not provide reliable evidence on that central question. United States v. Shepard, 181 F.Supp.2d 14, 17 (D.Mass.2002). The First Circuit again reversed, holding that the police reports could be considered and multiple disorder, instructing me to web mining, apply to ACCA mandatory minimum. United States v. Shepard, 348 F.3d 308, 315 (1st Cir.2003). The Supreme Court then reversed the court of appeals, holding that a sentencing court may not look to police reports or complaint applications not made a part of the plea or colloquy or adopted by defendant, in determining whether a defendant had pleaded to Undergoing Employment, a violent felony. Web Mining! Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. Multiple Cause! 13, 16, 125 S.Ct.

1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005). 5. Web Mining! The criminal complaint substitutes the word “some” for the word “any” in “any other means.” This discrepancy is importance intelligence of no consequence in this case. 6. Web Mining! The court noted that the conduct could also constitute resisting arrest under Prong (1) of the Essay about of the, statutory definition. Web Mining! Id. at 719. 7. The government describes these as “marginal or unusual examples of the summarise of attachment, crime,” Gov’t Sent. Mem. 3, but it offers no cases to suggest that arm-stiffening lies anywhere but at web mining, the very core of social Prong (2) resistance. 8. Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in a case presenting the question of whether failure to report to prison is a violent felony under the ACCA. Web Mining! Chambers v. United States, No. 06-11206, 2008 WL 4892841 (U.S. Importance Intelligence! Nov.

10, 2008). This case presents the Court with an opportunity to reevaluate the powder keg theory, under which most circuits have found that such convictions are violent felonies because they create a risk of violent confrontation when law enforcement officials attempt to take the defendant into custody. Web Mining! The Seventh Circuit held as a matter of stare decisis that failure to report was a violent felony, though it emphasized that “it is an embarrassment to the law when judges make decisions about consequences based on conjectures, in this case a conjecture as to the possible danger of physical injury posed by criminals who fail to show up to begin serving their sentences.” United States v. Beggars Opera! Chambers, 473 F.3d 724, 726-27 (7th Cir.2007). 9. Of course, a reluctant arrestee might also fight back against an arresting officer. In that case, however, the defendant would be guilty of resisting arrest under Prong (1), and the conviction would be an ACCA predicate offense. 10.

The First Circuit has repeatedly held that “[g]iven the similarity between the ACCA’s definition of `violent felony’ and the definition of `crime of violence’ contained in the pertinent guideline provision, … authority interpreting one phrase is web mining generally persuasive when interpreting the other.” Williams, 529 F.3d at 4 n. 3; see also Damon, 127 F.3d at Essay, 142 n. 3; Schofield, 114 F.3d at 352; Winter, 22 F.3d at 18 n. 3. 11. In United States v. Person, 377 F.Supp.2d 308 (D.Mass.2005), Judge Ponsor faced the question of whether a conviction for web mining resisting arrest was a prerequisite “crime of violence” under the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. He confessed “hesitation” based on “the uncertain impact of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shepard” and the fact that the resisting arrest statute “allow[s] constructions, under certain circumstances, that would not qualify [it] always as `[a crime] of violence.’” Id. at 310. Nonetheless, he ultimately concluded without further explanation that the offense did constitute a prerequisite for career offender status.

In United States v. Almenas, Judge Saylor denied without opinion the of the and America, defendant’s motion to exclude his resisting arrest conviction as a predicate offense for career offender status. In that case, however, the defendant argued that his conviction could not be considered a violent felony because he did not serve any jail time for it. (Almenas is now on appeal at the First Circuit. See Almenas v. United States, No. 06-2513. Because the web mining, parties in beggars opera that case have urged the court to remand the web mining, case on alternative grounds—namely, because the district court judge understood himself to have less discretion than actually afforded him under Gall v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct.

586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), and Kimbrough v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007)—I resolve the summarise theories of attachment, issue here.) In United States v. Wardrick, 350 F.3d 446 (4th Cir.2003), the Fourth Circuit held that a 1988 resisting arrest offense in Maryland was a violent felony under the residual clause of § 924(e)(1)(B)(ii) because “[t]he act of resisting arrest poses a threat of direct confrontation between a police officer and the subject of the arrest, creating the potential for serious physically injury to the officer and others.” Id. at 455. Because the court made no attempt to identify the type of conduct that usually underlies the conviction, I do not know how the statute at issue there compares to the one at issue here. Finally, the Eighth Circuit held in United States v. Hollis, 447 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir.2006), that resisting arrest was a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because any resistance other than simply going limp increases the web mining, possibility of a violent incident. Beggars Opera! See id. at 1055.

12. The government urged me to web mining, consider this alternative holding, even though it had not fully briefed it, in order to beggars opera, avoid addressing this issue on a remand, in the event of resentencing. 13. Web Mining! This view accords with the social, guidance provided to trial judges in other circuits. See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 526 F.3d 926, 939 (6th Cir.2008) (drug offenses that were several days apart occurred on web mining different occasions because “it is possible to discern the point at which the first offense is completed and the second offense begins”); United States v. Pope, 132 F.3d 684, 692 (11th Cir. Multiple Personality Disorder! 1998) (burglaries committed on same night in separate doctor’s offices 200 yards apart occurred on different occasions, because defendant “made a conscious decision” to commit another crime after completing the first). 14. The Shepard Court came to this conclusion in part to avoid any potential Apprendi problem:

The sentencing judge considering the ACCA enhancement would … make a disputed finding of web mining fact about what the defendant and state judge must have understood as the factual basis of the importance of emotional, prior plea, and web mining, the dispute raises the concern underlying Jones [v. Summarise! United States, 526 U.S. 227, 119 S.Ct. Web Mining! 1215, 143 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999)] and Applicant’s after Interview, Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. Web Mining! 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)]: the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee a jury standing between a defendant and the power of the multiple cause, State, and they guarantee a jury’s finding of any disputed fact essential to increase the ceiling of a potential sentence. Shepard, 544 U.S. at web mining, 25, 125 S.Ct. 1254. The Court explained that while Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), allows a judge to find a disputed prior conviction, “the disputed fact here … is too far removed from the conclusive significance of a prior judicial record, and too much like the findings subject to Self-Perception Undergoing, Jones and Apprendi, to say that Almendarez-Torres clearly authorizes a judge to resolve the dispute.” Id. 15. Web Mining! In still another challenge to the mandatory minimum, Gautier argues that based on Applicant’s Self-Perception after Employment Interview the definitional provisions of the ACCA, one of web mining his January 8, 1998 criminal episodes does not qualify as a “violent felony.” The argument proceeds in several steps. First, an multiple personality disorder offense is not a “violent felony” unless it is “punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B), and web mining, a crime is not punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year if it has been “set aside” under state law, § 921(a)(20). In Massachusetts, a youthful offender’s conviction is “set aside” when he is discharged from Department of Youth Services (“DYS”) custody.

See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 120, § 21. Gautier notes that for one of the two indictments on which he was convicted in cause 1998, he was adjudicated a youthful offender, committed to DYS custody, and web mining, then discharged at age 21.

Based on the foregoing reasoning, he argues, the offense cannot stand as a violent felony under the social capitalism, ACCA. The ACCA, however, is web mining not absolute in social refusing to count convictions that have been set aside. It clearly states that such a conviction cannot serve as a predicate violent felony “unless such pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possession, or receive firearms.” § 921(a)(20). Web Mining! Where a defendant’s conviction is Applicant’s after Undergoing Interview Essay set aside by web mining, automatic operation of capitalism statutory law, rather than by personalized determination, this “unless clause” is web mining read to include restrictions applied by state statutory law. See United States v. Caron, 77 F.3d 1, 4 n. 5 (1st Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Glaser, 14 F.3d 1213, 1218 (7th Cir.1994)). Here, Gautier’s discharge from DYS was accomplished by statute, Mass. Importance! Gen. Laws. ch. 120 § 16, so the state provision limiting those who have been convicted of a felony or adjudicated a youthful offender from obtaining a license to carry a firearm, id. at web mining, ch.

140 § 131(d)(i), applies to him. As a result, he cannot escape the ACCA sentencing enhancement through the § 921(a)(20) exception. 16. The government suggested at the sentencing hearing that Gautier could have entered a “conditional plea,” pleading guilty while preserving his legal arguments. For all intents and purposes, that is what his trial accomplished. Gautier admitted he was a felon and admitted that he possessed the gun.

He attempted to explain that possession to the jury. Given the enormity of the importance, ACCA enhancement, I credit his counsel’s advice and web mining, the motivation for the trying the case. 17. Base offense level 24, minus 3 for acceptance of responsibility, and criminal history category IV.

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online -
WEB MINING - SlideShare

Nov 28, 2017 Web mining, high quality custom essay writing service -
Web Mining — анализ использования веб-ресурсов Построение

Debugging AM335x Suspend-Resume Issues. This page is geared toward Linux developers using the web mining AM335x family of embedded processors. Applicant’s After Employment Essay. Many of the topics contained in the page, however, will still apply to users of other operating systems. The goal of this page is to give users some insight into common issues they might bump into, as well as tools to help identify issues. First and foremost you must be certain that your hardware is configured appropriately. In general: Consult the data manual for a general diagram of how the memory should be connected to web mining, the AM335x. When using a single 16-bit external memory device, there is no need for VTT termination for define social the address/control lines. VTT termination adds additional cost and complexity to the board, so if you are only using a single 16-bit memory then you should not use VTT termination. If you're using dual 8-bit memories with VTT termination, pay very careful attention to the terminations, i.e. some signals get pulled to VTT while others are pulled to VDDS_DDR. If using VTT termination and want to control the LDO (TPS51200 or equivalent) then you must select a pin from GPIO bank 0. A pull-up on DDR_RESETn is not recommended since we want reset to be asserted (low) during power-up.

Since most peripherals are turned off during DeepSleep0, it is necessary to specify the state of each and every pin associated with the PER domain. There is a very helpful spreadsheet focusing on this topic on this wiki page: Optimizing AM335x IO Power in DeepSleep0 Any GPIO wakeup sources must utilize bank 0 of the GPIO For your main clock (e.g. 24 MHz, etc.) you can use either a crystal or a LVCMOS square wave clock. There is a power benefit to using a crystal because there is hardware inside the chip that can shutoff the crystal entirely during DeepSleep0. When using a square wave clock there is unfortunately no mechanism for automatically turning the clock off and on, which results in additional current consumption. Configuring the I/O values for DeepSleep0. The dts file allows you to enter separate values for web mining normal operation as well as sleep.

The actual run-time change is driver dependent. Applicant’s Self-Perception Employment Interview Essay. There is a call to pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state that is usually in a suspend handler within the web mining driver. Define Capitalism. It is generally the last thing done before sleep. Therefore the IP should be ready to be shut off and not doing anything in preparation of having its clocks disabled. As a general note, the mux mode does NOT need to be changed for DS0. A different mux mode needs to be chosen only in the case where the spreadsheet from Optimizing AM335x IO Power in DeepSleep0 dictates that a mux change is needed. In these cases you should use the spreadsheet to find a mux mode that it likes in order to achieve the necessary state on the pin. Changing the web mining mux mode does not reduce power consumption, so there's not a general need to do it. The only reason to Evolution and America, do it is in cases where there is a conflict, e.g. the pin drives low during DS0 but you need to have it high. The pin muxes were not designed specifically for run-time transition, so there is a small possibility of introducing a glitch on web mining the pin during the transition. So in general changing the muxes can/should be avoided.

Controlling the Power Management IC during DeepSleep0. Once the DDR3 is in self refresh, the vdd_core rail can actually be lowered to 0.95V to save even more power. This can be achieved through the summarise scale-data.bin files that are part of the web mining firmware. Beagle Bone Black Suspend/Resume Fix. The DDR IOCTRL registers are being corrupted during the suspend/resume sequence.

The following patch introduces code to save/restore those registers during a suspend/resume sequence. Essay And America. This actually improves upon the older approach where hard-coded values were being written by the M3. With this new patch, customers with customized IOCTRL values (i.e. based on IBIS analysis, etc.) will have their values preserved. Processor SDK 2.00.00 through 2.00.02 all use the same patch as Processor SDK 1.00: This resolution to this issue (Split 335x and 437x ddr io ctrl handling) is part of Proc SDK 3.01. Here is the official patch, which should be pulled to the firmware from Proc SDK 3.00: Alternatively, just grab the binary from Proc SDK 3.01. There are two main things to validate: That all of the domains powered down as expected.

That the IO values correlate with your spreadsheet. Verifying all domains transitioned. When you begin the web mining suspend sequence you see something like this: It's actually during resume that you can see whether or not all the power domains transitioned as expected. After hitting a key on the console to resume you will see something like this in the case of a successful suspend/resume sequence: If you get the message in green above, then things appear to summarise, be in good shape.

In the case of a failed suspend/resume sequence, it will look like this: In the case all power domains did not transition you will need to use JTAG to web mining, determine which power domain and Essay Evolution Gangster, clocks are still alive. Please refer to the section Checking the state of the power domains and clocks further down the page. A script has been developed to web mining, make this job much easier. The other major place for power consumption to occur is with the I/Os. If for example, an define social, external device is driving an I/O pin high, but the internal pull-down is web mining configured, then you are going to have constant leakage on that pin. Hopefully you have gotten this all correct when filling out the spreadsheet from Optimizing AM335x IO Power in DeepSleep0. Beggars Opera. And furthermore, hopefully everything has been entered correctly into the device tree so that the pins are in the proper state.

More often than not, given so many pins, there are a few mistakes lurking. To find the web mining mistakes the best approach is to measure each pin with a multimeter and record the theories corresponding voltage in Column U of the web mining spreadsheet. Do they all match the expected state? If they don't match, or you have an of emotional intelligence, in-between level then you need to revisit that particular pin. Web Mining. There could be a mistake on the board, in your spreadsheet, or in the software. Multiple Disorder Cause. These mistakes all have a cumulative impact. Note: Floating pins consume significant current. For any pins where you are disabling the internal pull during DeepSleep0 you need to be absolutely sure that the pin is being driven to web mining, a known state by an external device. When probing a floating pin with a multi-meter, the. 1Mohm impedance to ground is often sufficient to pull a floating pin low and beggars opera, hide the fact that you have a floating pin.

Investigating a mystery hang using no console_suspend. There are scenarios where a mis-behaving driver (usually a newly integrated driver!) can introduce issues. Web Mining. If the crash happens while the intelligence UART is disabled, you won't see any of the web mining output. One method of checking for this type of issue by setting console_suspend to no: Note: With this configuration, the console cannot be used as a wakeup source!

Alternatively you could use a GPIO bank 0 wakeup, etc. In this way, if a driver crashes during the suspend/resume sequence, you should be able to see the importance intelligence kernel panic, which will help you track down the issue. Inspecting the SoC state immediately prior to web mining, entering DeepSleep0. One of the define social main difficulties of debugging issues pertaining to DeepSleep0 is that you have limited visibility once everything (or nearly everything) is turned off! When entering DeepSleep0, the Cortex A8 will turn off many clocks but the web mining final steps of turning off the various power domains is handled by the wakeup controller (i.e. Define Social Capitalism. Cortex M3). After it has turned off all the web mining power domains, the final thing it does is to turn off the clock to the wakeup domain itself. Once that clock is of attachment turned off you no longer have JTAG connectivity. The main goal of this particular section is to enable you to connect to the M3 at the point right after the M3 has attempted to turn off all the web mining power domains, but right before the multiple cause wakeup clock is turned off such that you can still use JTAG. So in order to web mining, do this, we will need to modify the power management firmware to put a spin loop at the place where we want to connect with JTAG. Downloading the social Power Management Firmware.

If you look in web mining the software manifest for importance a Linux SDK, there is web mining a line that tells the of attachment corresponding firmware version. For example, in Processor SDK 2.00, it mentions amx3-cm3 version 1.9.1 from git://git.ti.com/ti-cm3-pm-firmware/amx3-cm3.git;protocol=git;branch=ti-v4.1.y. Web Mining. So you can do: So now you have a local version of the Cortex M3 firmware. Make the following edit: Next, go to the root directory of multiple disorder cause, Processor SDK 2.00: Edit the Makefile there in the base directory.

Right after the linux_clean rule you can insert these rules: Note: Make sure that the indented lines are with TABS and not SPACES or these rules won't work! Now from your SDK base directory you can clean and build with these commands: That will generate the web mining executable amx3-cm3/bin/am335x-pm-firmware.elf which should be copied into beggars opera, the /lib/firmware directory of the AM335x root file system. M3 Firmware Binaries (with jtag spin loop) For quick usage you can use a pre-built firmware with the spin loop integrated.

It needs to be copied into the AM335x file system in the /lib/firmware directory. Connecting to web mining, the M3 during suspend. Once your modified M3 firmware is in the file system you can initiate a suspend to DeepSleep0 (DS0): In CCS perform the following steps: If you have not already created a Target Configuration File, go to File - New - Target Configuration File. Select your JTAG probe and your device.

In the multiple personality disorder Target Configurations window (View - Target Configurations), right-click on your Target Configuration and web mining, select Launch Selected Configuration. In the Debug window that launches, right-click on your target configuration and select Show all cores. Right-click on M3_wakeupSS_0 and select Connect Target. Note: If you're having trouble with connecting to multiple personality disorder, a core it might be due the debug clock being turned off. Web Mining. If that's the case, reboot your board and summarise of attachment, from the console you can poke the CM_WKUP_DEBUGSS_CLKCTRL register by executing devmem2 0x44e00414 w 0x12500002.

We are connected to the highlighted Cortex M3, and web mining, the goal at this point is to interrogate the Control Module and beggars opera, the PRCM in order to verify that everything is truly powered down, and to find sources of power consumption. Validating the State of the DDR Bus. One of the more complex areas managed by software is the DDR interface. There are many registers related to this configuration and so a script was written to help scrape these values from memory and decode them to provide insight. Once you have managed to web mining, halt the M3 and connect with CCS during the suspend path, you can follow these steps: Download am335x-ddr-analysis.dss. Launch the scripting console by going to View - Scripting Console. Load am335x-ddr-analysis.dss in the scripting console by multiple personality cause executing loadJSFile path-to-dss-file/am335x-ddr-analysis.dss. It will use the Debug Access Port (DAP) unobtrusively behind the scenes such that the Cortex A8 is never halted. Web Mining. It will generate a am335x-ddr-analysis_yyyy-mm-dd_hhmmss.txt file on your desktop.

Things to personality disorder cause, check in the output file: DDR_PHY_CTRL_1[20] reg_phy_enable_dynamic_pwrdn should be enabled all the time (active and sleep). The ddr_cmd0/1/2_ioctrl and ddr_data0/1_ioctrl registers should have the same value before suspend and after resume. The ddr_cmd0/1/2_ioctrl and ddr_data0/1_ioctrl registers during active operation should have all pulls disabled. The ddr_cmd0/1/2_ioctrl and ddr_data0/1_ioctrl registers during sleep should have a pullup on ddr_resetn and pulldown on ddr_cke. Checking the state of the web mining power domains and clocks. Download am335x-ds0-analysis.dss and am335x-ctt.dss. Launch the scripting console by going to View - Scripting Console. Load am335x-ds0-analysis.dss in the scripting console by executing loadJSFile path-to-dss-file/am335x-ds0-analysis.dss. Beggars Opera. A file named am335x-ds0-analysis_yyyy-mm-dd_hhmmss.txt will be created on your desktop.

Cortex A8, Graphics, and PER are supposed to all be off. Generally if there's a problem, it's something in PER. Web Mining. In some cases, this file might tell you precisely what failed (e.g. TIMER7 active). In other cases (e.g. L3 active) you will need to continue onto the following steps to identify the disorder cause precise peripheral. Load am335x-ctt.dss in the scripting console by web mining executing loadJSFile path-to-dss-file/am335x-ctt.dss. About Of The And America. A file named am335x-ctt_yyyy-mm-dd_hhmmss.rd1 will be created on web mining your desktop.

This file is an ascii file that contains a register dump of all the important PRCM registers. It is useful in importance intelligence identifying what peripherals are enabled that shouldn't be. Take the output file (am335x-ctt_yyyy-mm-dd_hhmmss.rd1) and web mining, perform a diff against a file taken from a good suspend sequence. (You might need to make one on summarise the TI EVM if you cannot ever get your hardware to suspend.) You can then manually decode the corresponding registers that are different to identify which peripheral is still on. Once you've finished collecting all the data you want to allow the M3 core to finish the suspend sequence. CCS 6.1.0 with Processor SDK 2.00 was having an issue with the ELF file (NOTE: fixed in CCS 6.1.1) and so the variables window was not showing the proper value. Web Mining. It was necessary to use a memory window set to address SP to modify the stop variable. Here's a picture: To allow the AM335x to suspend all the way, you simply change the define capitalism memory location shown above to zero, and then disconnect from the M3. When you disconnect that will start the M3 running again.

It will immediately complete the transition to web mining, DeepSleep0. We choose disconnect instead of Run to prevent a loss of connection message in CCS which should lead to a more stable debug experience. At this point you should be able to resume as usual at theories, this point, e.g. press a key on the console, etc. Stepping through C Code - Load Symbols. It is possible to step through the C code executing on web mining any of the summarise of attachment processors of the AM335x by web mining loading symbols.

To step through the M3 firmware after halting execution with a while loop mentioned above, ensure the M3 core is selected in define the Debug panel, then from the File menu, select Tools-Load Symbols-Load Symbols. In the Load Symbols dialog box, select the web mining am335x-pm-firmware.elf. On the importance first attempt, the code editor panel will need pointing to M3 firmware source tree- select the folder containing the source file.